Media Article example essay topic

Many tragedies, deaths and other popular actions take place everyday around the world, and we the people, count on media to cover these accounts in full detail. News articles and the media are two topics that go hand-in-hand with each other when discussing the perception of a world topic. Giving the media this power to describe the account also gives them the power to one-side any particular story. Often false accusations are made and wrong people are blamed, for no other reason than the media pointing fingers in wrong directions.

The media also has the power to confuse, for as one media program might cover an account to be the blame of one man and another media program to be blame of another. The media has been given too much power with influencing the thoughts of people across the world. Take in The war with Iraq has sparked many different views and perspectives in the media world. Such popular topics of discussion with broadcasters and reports have been: Is Busch to blame?

Is the War really necessary? Is the US sticking its nose where it shouldn't be? And so the list goes on forever and ever. With such a popular international topic such as this, the media has the power to break it down to every little aspect as long as the viewer is interested. Who is the decision maker, who is the one that chooses who is truly at fault?

How do we know the media doesn't change views based on which country its news is broadcasting in? With America at war with Iraq, do American televisions say Iraq kills 10 U.S. soldiers, while an Iraqi one states that U.S. invades country to take over? The heart of any media article or report is in the tone, perspective, and content. Although both of these articles are one two different specific sub-topics, they are both on the same topic; and with sharing the same topic they also both share the same tone.

They both share the same perspective of a guilty Iraq. As for the content; they are mostly similar except that the second article, "Pentagon: 110 U.S. Troops Killed in Iraq", is a little more enlightened towards the U.S. taking some blame. The two pieces of media material I have reviewed share many similarities yet many differences in tone, perspective and content. Both of these pieces cover basically the same topic of the war in Iraq. Although each one gets into different detail about the event, both keep the same perspective. The perspective is that being of a guilty or blameful Iraq.

Both of these articles have been retrieved from man. com / ms nbc. com, thus being a U.S. related media source. Each of the articles are titled "Deadliest month since Iraq invasion" and "Pentagon: 110 U.S. Troops Killed in Iraq". When these titles are first heard, read, or viewed by Americans the first thought that comes to find is not one of a blameful U.S. but that of a rotten Iraq nation. As the article goes on, it continues to speak of how rebellious Iraq soldiers in coalition with the citizens open daily attacks on innocent U.S. soldiers. The tone of these articles share many characteristics when being reviewed. Each one shared a grim, gloomy, tone of death and destruction.

Neither article had a positive nor enlightened side that would show hope or progress. The points of these articles were to appeal the sympathetic and emotional sides of the reader; making he or she feel an upset or sadness when reading about the death of our soldiers. As for the content of these two pieces, the Titles say it all; for both titles refer to the deaths of American soldiers as well as the articles do. Although the second article, "Pentagon: 110 U.S. Troops Killed in Iraq", discusses more into detail about how the U.S. should not continue to stay in Iraq, it still focuses on the deaths being of an Iraq blame. Even though these articles share many similarities they also share many differences. Besides the obvious differences of titles, authors, and Media Company, the articles still posses other differences.

A major difference between the two is that one of the articles, "Pentagon... ". , talks of a possible guilty America. This is a major issue with media companies, because this single idea could spark major changes in not only the morale but overall economy of a country. The other difference between the two articles is the second one also presents the fact that they are still other countries that might pose a threat to the American people. By mentioning the possibility that other countries continue to pose a threat, the author thus shifted all the attention from Iraq to the other countries mentioned. Of the differences presented in the two articles there was little to make of them. Due to the articles similarity and close relationship it was difficult to analyze the articles minuscule differences.

Of my close examination I found that neither article spoke of any real news but rather a hot topic of popularity. For many Americans know that there are American deaths over in Iraq, and the media is less concerned with real news and more concerned with what sells. With reading these articles came full coverage about the accounts of the event, while also many commonalities between the two pieces. Through absorbing the information from these two pieces I was able to understand and take-in the theme, and / or point, of the article. The commonality of the two articles helped give me a better view as to what information was really credible.

Both of the articles spoke of American deaths in Iraq and both gave a solid number to about how many. Neither of the two articles agreed on a specific number, which was confusing. After reading both pieces I was able to find that there were many Americans deaths over in Iraq, between about 75 and 100. Each article spoke of guilty Iraq soldiers and citizens. With this other commonality I was also able to infer that the majority of the deaths were of an Iraqi blame. One of the articles was a little more open-minded towards America being at fault.

It's obvious that the deaths of American soldiers are due to the Iraqis, because we are at war with Iraq, but who is to say we are doing the right thing by being in Iraq? As I have stated before, the second article mentions word that America made the wrong choice. The article goes on saying how Iraqi soldiers and civilians are killing U.S. troops, but at the end of the article drops a line about America being at fault. By doing this the readers view is totally changed for they understand the part about the "evil" Iraq, but now the author has implanted a new thought, or idea, in the readers head. Now, the blame is thus shifted from not only Iraq, but to the President as well. And so the reader is left with a hatred towards Iraq but also a sense of doubtfulness towards the leadership of the President.

Who is to blame, who is to say what is right and what is not? There is no one that can truly decide who is right and who is wrong, besides God himself, but there is some one that can have a major effect in the influence of others. This person I speak of is, none other than, the media. For only the people truly have the power to decide how they feel, but only the media has the power to influence the thoughts of millions. And with these millions of Americans, and others, absorbing what the media tells us, it is no wonder why they are such a powerful source..