Mind Of The Miller's Wife example essay topic
Another, even more provocative question has never been asked: did the Miller actually hang himself? Beebe suggests a close examination of the text suggests that both deaths may be imaginative constructs that exist only in the mind of the miller's wife. The critics, and most casual readers, have neglected to remember that nothing is a given in Robinson's work. The exegetical evidence in this case rests largely upon Robinson's subtle handling of verb tenses, sentence structure, and punctuation. Beebe implies that the first line of the poem, 'The miller's wife had waited long,' is in past perfect, a tense that implies action previous to the simple past, and a rather more complicated, problematical placement in time than simple past alone suggests. This enclosing effect continues after the semicolon, which itself heralds dependency, and is indeed followed by a convoluted conditional clause that comprises the last six lines of the eight-line stanza.
"The colon after 'said' implies an appositive clause equal in value to what went before, here the thoughts of the miller's wife as she waited by the dead fire". 'There are no millers anymore,' / Was all that she had heard him say' closes the parenthesis of past perfect tense that the first line opens, containing within it the miller's actual words, which Beebe and the reader can take to be the objective fulcrum upon which the rest of this intensely subjective poem balances. It is even clearer that the past perfect is this stanza's essential condition of being when we come to the second past perfect verb, 'had lingered,' found in a clause subordinate to the one before. Thus, Lucius Beebe points out that Robinson sets up the stanza as a sort of verbal chandelier, with one clause hanging upon the meaning and mode of that before, and with the framework of past perfect verbs giving definition and tone to the whole. Robinson achieves much the same effect in the second stanza, which opens with the miller's wife 'sick with a fear that had no form,' which implies that the fear has a continuation in the past. Beebe implies that "a certain poetic inertia militates against supposing change, and much more is needed to indicate or certify such change than exists".
This hypothesis is reinforced by the rest of the stanza, a single sentence formed by a pair of past conditional clauses. 'What he had meant,' as direct object, parallels 'What else there was,' as subject, forming a nice balance of speculation within the triple-layered clause. This is continued within the second clause by 'what was hanging from a beam,' forming a seesaw of supposition that is given another push by the predicate 'Would not have heeded,' another past conditional verb. Beebe suggests that this back and forth structure intensifies the pervasive aura of speculation that surrounds all we know of the miller's wife so far. This ongoing verbal balancing act also underscores the connotative probability of the miller's wife's never having left her cold hearth and colder ruminations. The overall structure of the stanza bears this out as well, with two equally balanced sentences of two clauses each, with each part carrying equal weight.
A formless fear cannot be equated with the actuality of a husband dead by his own hand. The third stanza makes an even stronger case for the power of the imagination. The first two words -- 'And if' -- cast the entire stanza into the speculative mode. The second clause is appositive to the first, as in the first stanza, and both clauses express conditionality stemming directly from 'And if. ' This interpretation is further supported by the sensuousness of the central image of the stanza, the 'starry velvet' of the 'Black water, smooth above the weir,' that may be 'ruffled. ' These couturier images emanate from the sensibility of a woman's mind ranging through imaginative possibilities, and we must know that we are indeed inside her mind, not directly the mind of the poet.
The true subject is the enormous power of the creative imagination, which seizes the miller's wife in its fearful grasp, and many a reader along with her. Even the woman herself is called only the miller's wife, with no name or identity separate from his. Robinson's subtle use of form seduces the reader into following the miller's wife into a depth of imaginative fear that has no grounding except the miller's one sad statement. The miller's statement is the interpretive balance point of the poem.