Mode Of Self Reflexive Cinema example essay topic
(Prince 290) The more familiar of the two modes of self-reflexive cinema make use of a comedic style, and what's more, many contemporary comedies embody comedic self-reflexivity (Prince 291). These comedies do so because it facilitates a more personal rapport between the characters and the audience, thus amplifying the humor that can be seen in the narrative. However, there are certain limitations to comic self reflexivity. By presupposing the audience's familiarity with the humor or references in the narrative, the mode risks reaching an audience that does not relate to the material presented.
Some films are unable to meet a large audience because their narratives are constructed from "inside" jokes that can not be understood by all who will see it. (Prince 290) The other mode of self-reflexive cinema that addresses an issue of importance is commonly known as didactic self-reflexivity. Beginning in the 1920's with Bert olt Brecht, a playwright who wanted to craft plays that were reflective of society and that made sure the audience was aware of this. He wished that his work inform the public and impact social change, to share his perception without a screen. Seeing realism as an impediment that kept the audience from perceiving the message of the art, Brecht sought to devise theater that was uncompromisingly revolutionary and candid. This new style was characterized by the employment of titles to reveal the next action, in the way that the characters of the play sometimes spoke to the audience, and was all together anti-naturalist.
The techniques of didactic self-reflexivity were "anti-illusionist in that they sought to dispel the illusion of a self-contained fictional world created by conventional drama and stagecraft". The basic purpose being to rupture the obstruction between the viewer and the characters. Jean-Luc Godard's Weekend, released in 1967, was completed just prior to the student uprising and general strike in France during May 1968. It is a film in which Godard unequivocally proclaims his adherence to the Marxist critique of capitalism as well as an affinity for Third World rebukes of the West and imperialism. Throughout the narrative Godard contrasts the wealth and decadence of France with its consequential atomization, violence, and barbarism. He also infuses the narrative with extensive discourses on the failure of Western military democracy and the need for revolution.
The 1960's were a decade of great upheaval within France: the repercussions of the Second World War were still being felt; there were colonial wars in Indochina and Algeria; furthermore, a general malaise and discontent was sweeping through society, effecting the young especially, under the onslaught of materialism and modernity. Weekend, at its core, is a direct reflection and expression of this decade in French history, which can be said to be symptomatic of all the great Western military democracies. The film is a direct and unapologetic attack upon the decadence and atomization that have resulted from this process. Weekend represents the culture of political violence and social experimentation, artistic and sexual, which was the latter half of the 1960's. This somewhat comic but depressing film of Godard's is a satirical poem and construct of the contempt with which he obviously holds bourgeoisie society. Much of the film expresses this through the use of symbolism and metaphor.
In order to better facilitate the process whereby the audience becomes aware of Godard's intentions and his message he introduces us to a young Parisian married couple. Godard sets the clich " ed couple, alienated and bourgeois, on a journey for Corinne's parents' country house, hoping to find them either dead or willing to sign the will. As they persist in their journey we are given various opportunities to appreciate the absolute complacency and ignorance of the couple (meant to be emblematic of all bourgeois). Godard tries to peel off the hypocrisy of bourgeois society through the weekend trip of this Parisian middle class couple.
Weekend is a clear continuation of the style, and even ideology, which originated with Brecht's work in the theater. Jean Luc Godard weaves didactic self-reflexive techniques throughout the film, in order to "break the illusion that the spectator is watching a real, authentic world on screen rather than a movie". In doing so, Godard finds the ability to share his discourse directly with the audience instead of employing characters to do the job for him. Much of the film is thus transformed into an essay in the sense that there are moments in which the dialogue is aimed at the audience. Weekend makes use of three kinds of didactic, self-reflexive techniques: nontraditional camera techniques, the inclusion of imaginary characters, moments of performance self-disclosure, and the manipulation of titles. One key element of didactic self-reflexivity is the frequency of nontraditional camera techniques, which is also one of the most distinguishing features of Weekend.
The unique nature of his style of camera movement is exemplified in four key scenes. The first, and most original, is the tracking shot of the traffic jam at the beginning of the film. Altogether it is near ten minutes long and is one of the clearest representations Godard has constructed to illustrate the predicament that modern Western society is faced with. Godard preempts this scene with the title, Une Sc " ene de la Vie Parisienne. Here in Paris, no one communicates with one another nor do they exhibit patience, yet they sit restlessly in their automobiles, honking incessantly. The nontraditional nature of this seemingly bizarre shot is uncomfortable to watch and confusing.
The horns grow louder and more prolonged as the couple attempt to squeeze through what seems to be miles of back-up. Finally, upon reaching the cause of the delay, we are shown one of the nearly twenty fatal automobile accidents that litter the narrative. The very purpose of this is to relay the discomfort and restlessness that the characters feel, that sets up the later political discourse. The scene in which Corinne recounts her sexual fantasy before her lover is another excellent example of the innovative way in which Godard has shot this film. Throughout the recounting of her apparent sexual encounter with another woman and her husband, the camera tracks in and out from the characters as the music gets louder and then fades out, only to repeat this over and over. The music becomes so obtrusive at certain points that one cannot understand the dialogue (without the subtitles) and it adds a very uneasy tension to the scene that is uncharacteristic of a film.
Another very particular shot that exemplifies the nontraditional camera techniques employed by Godard is a double 360-degree pan around the piano player seated at a grand piano in the middle of a courtyard. While he explains and plays Mozart to the workers and our young couple, the camera turns, as if on an axis, capturing everything taking place around the musician. He informs us that in fact all "modern serious music" is the kind of music that you don't really listen to, and that Mozart's genius and innovation can be found within all of it, and furthermore it is Mozart that you should be listening to. A fourth and very important shot in the film is the scene with the two garbage men, one, an African and his 'brother' an Arab. During this shot of the African and Arab the camera is stationary and fixed upon the faces of each.
What is more unique, each character is spoken for by the other. As we are forced to stare deep into the eyes of the Arab, it is the African, off-screen, who is giving us the dialogue. Then again, the camera settles very close on the face of the African, while the dialogue, his dialogue, is being read by the Arab off-screen. This technique draws our attention to the speech and the viewer is captivated by the language and force of the Third World discourse that Godard presents. These superficially independent interruptions to the narrative come together to give the film its significant revolutionary implication. Other key examples of self-reflexive technique within Weekend are the inclusion of imaginary characters within the narrative, which actually interrupts the narrative as it is unfolding, and performance self disclosure.
The couple, without hope and lost, confronts Emily Bronte and her companion on the road and demand directions to the next town. After losing their patience with the characters, the husband sets Emily Bronte on fire, reminding his wife that she is fake and cannot suffer, or more so that she should not feel guilty. Her companion later reads from his book as she is burning. He denounces the greed and ignorance of humanity, because they only buy knowledge in order to sell it, and they seek cheap knowledge in order to turn a profit. In the middle of this scene, Roland becomes very frustrated with the situation, and curses the film that they are in for being terrible.
This is known as performance self-disclosure and is characteristic of self-reflexive cinema, including the comedic variety. Godard's film is also immediately recognizable in its use of titles to prepare the audience for the next scene and even sometimes to tell the viewer what should be understood or taken from a scene. For instance, a title passes on screen reading 'World / 3', just before the African and Arab workers explain their optimism and their reasons for accepting the necessity for violence. As seen throughout the film, Godard uses these titles as a device to: Introduce and set off a given scene from the surrounding context of the narrative, tell viewers what it is they are about to see, remind viewers of the filmmakers intrusion on the narrative, and emphasize the way the filmmaker has chosen to shape and organize the structure of the film. Filmmakers like Jean Luc Godard employ the devices of the self-reflexive mode of screen reality because they do not value the mode of realism or expressionism to adequately convey some social truth or ideal.
In choosing a didactic style of representational reality, he sought to guide and direct the viewer through the key representations and dialogues within the film. Godard believes that it is necessary for the audience to read the film as it must be without misinterpretation and as such has employed didactic self-reflexive devices which facilitate a clear reading of the film. The film is the message for Godard..