More Social Talkative Environment example essay topic

Nature V. Nurture The debate over what shapes the way a child behaves and conducts themselves has been going on for what seems like forever. Do our genes, or our environment mold our personalities? I believe a person's environment they grew up in, and their current environment affects their personality more than heredity. There are a variety of environments that will affect the personality.

These environments are; family, physical, cultural, and social. These factors do a great deal to shape a child's way of life, and I will attempt to validate my opinion via this paper. In accordance with the notes we took in class, the physical environment entails the conditions a child would grow up around. If you took a child, of good stock and heritage, and tossed them into a de lapidated situation... that child will grow up much differently than if they had the pampered lifestyle of their parents. They will grow up knowing poverty, and become hardened, having to fight day in and day out for survival. Children in these situations often turn to a life of crime to live.

In a ghetto situation, there is no room for the weak hearted individual, who expects everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Children who grow up in more posh surroundings, like the suburbs, tend to have many more opportunities for sucess than their counterparts in the urban environment. They often have a better education, and more inspiration to excel. They, typically, also have nicer homes, with more luxuries.

Children in the suburbs are less prone to violence as well, they have very little to fight for. In the video we watched about the babies who could perform amazing educational feats, any child with a normal IQ could learn to do those things. The place these babies went was called the Better Baby institute, created by a man named Glen Domain. No matter what their Family environment, at that young, extremely impressionable age, the child could be taught very advanced things. However, I do not mean to put down the importance of the family environment. The family is perhaps the most important influence on a child's development.

It is also the parents of the babies at the institute's duty to reinforce what they learn there, and help teach their children on subjects like simple chemistry, and foreign languages. It is our parents that teach us right from wrong as well, and it is them who bestow moral value in us. Orphan children lacking this strong family influence at an early age will have a difficult time adjusting to some of the common rules of acceptable conduct in todays world. There are many films depicting kids taken into foster care during early adolescence constantly getting into trouble and mischief until they are taught the "right way" to behave by the parental figures. Everything from athletics, to art may be taught any child by their parents. Even if a child does not have a pre disposition for being an amazing artist, they can still become one if their parents enrol e them in an art school at an early enough age, and make sure that they motivate them along the way.

The same goes for athletics, if a child has a family history of paper shuffling office dwellers, that doesn'y mean they will be that way. Given the proper nurturing in the early stages of life, they could become the next Heisman Trophy winner. The social environment serves as yet another huge influence on human behavior. It is defined as everyone around with whom you share no relation. How you see yourself, and how you think others see you is very important, and it is especially important when you are talking about somebody's personality. Chapels Cooley pioneered this subject by coming up with the theories about the "self" and the "looking-glass-self".

It is the principle that a person bases how they see themselves on how they think others see them. The self is how you think others perceive you, and the looking-glass self is how you see you. I recently underwent an experiment in class to see if the way I saw myself was the same as my fellow classmates. I sat in front of the class and prepared to be criticized and asked questions of. At first it was somewhat nerve racking, but then I discovered that most everybody saw me as someone they could talk to and relate well with. This certainly made me think more highly about myself.

It also made me more confident that the way I am is good, and that I should never try and change myself to suit anybody else. It really made me appreciate me. Another social factor that makes peoples' personalities change is something called the Hawthorne effect. It is the theory that one will act differently and change their normal behavior when they are being watched. For example, when the principal sits in during one of your classes. Usually that class might be very talkative, and much more boisterous, and that could just be their normal acceptable daily behavior.

However, when the principal is there, it changes that classes behavior dramatically. What once was a more social talkative environment becomes a more sterile and quiet place. One final thing to note about the Social Environment comes from an internet article called "The Whole Boy". The article does not limit itself to siding with one side of the Nature vs. Nurture debate, however, this means it provides good information for whichever side you choose. Environmental Learning Theory: Environment is more important than biology. In this view nurture is stronger than nature.

Development is considered to be environmentally determined, and behavioral, where development can be engineered. Social Learning, Conditioning, and Learning Theory are associated with this camp. For instance, a boys's ex-drive is determined according to how much emphasis is put on it by his peers and how openly the issue is discussed in the home.