Most Powerful Men In Iraq example essay topic
To make my case more authentic and trust-worthy I will support my essay by relating parts to an already powerful man in power resulting in the use of corruption and illegal activities. Corruption has been an almost common tool that people (s) have used for tens of thousands of years for personal gains. Most individuals start by doing very deceiving secret things but once their power gradually becomes bigger and once at the top of their game (e.g. : King of England) you then have the situation where no one has the power to stop you where by before you would of just been thrown away. Cheating your way through things and doing things in a non-ligament way can almost be an addiction. This has proven to be the case through-out history.
Look at Saddam Hussein for an example he had kept control on Iraq via corruption. He was the most powerful man in Iraq, if not, the most feared which a lot would argue is the same thing to an extent and differently had a bigger impact in countries like Iraq than what it would in places like here in Australia. Being one of the most powerful men in Iraq, Saddam Hussein had no limitations or anything stopping him. He had gotten to the top with corruption; why not continue to do the barbaric acts he had committed to keep his reign of power? That he did. If Saddam Hussein was ever questioned by someone or a party, he would simply have them killed.
If there was anyone to challenge his position, what would happen, he'd have them tortured and killed. His armies, his government, his family, himself is what makes the Hussein family so feared, not because of government positions, but what they are willing to do, far past the boarder line of barbaric, and the fact of the matter is, there's nothing no one can do about it. Besides blowing up the country, but that's another matter. People like Saddam Hussein do every single definition of corruption every day, almost as if it was the normal thing to do.
There are different levels of corruption, the lowest being the less harmful ones bribery etc. Then you go to the other side of the scale and if you look at moral principle and wickedness, these are the kinds of corruption that are far more barbaric and tend to happen once an individual is in a certain state of power where by they can not be stop, such as Saddam Hussein. These 2 kinds of corruption lead to a lethal combination, taking a persons life in order for your own personal benefits, is this right, do you have the right? These answers are of course no. But a part of being corrupt is committing acts that aren't right in the first place. The reason that absolute power does make people act in a different way to the point where by what they are doing is corruption and is wrong, is because they can.
There's not a damn thing anyone can do about it, and some of these individuals do have so much power that if anyone does speak out about something like this, they " ll be put to rest. Another very large contributing factor is greed or putting yourself in a position where by you " re the most beneficial person in an situation. So yes, having absolute power does make select individuals expand the limitations of what is and what isn't morally correct to do. But it also does depend on the person, but the need for power and control gets the best of most people.