Most Successful Third Party Presidential Candidate example essay topic
Also, third parties tend to do exactly the opposite when their agenda concerns social issues. Then there is the "spoiler factor" a Third Party Candidate can collect enough votes to change the outcome of a Presidential Election. In the United States political scientist and other scholars have placed third parties into four specific categories with various political functions. First, third parties are sometimes created to address sectional issues. Meaning a geographical area has a political or social issue or issues that are not being satisfied by the two major parties.
Sectional Parties are often created and used to express the rights of particular states in America. One of the best examples of a sectional party was the Dixiecrat party of the south. The party was formed in southern states over the issue of Civil Rights and integration in the Unites States. Secondly, historically third parties have been formed to address single issues. In the United States these issues have included things such as slavery, prohibition, agricultural concerns, and other social issues. The Republican Party was originally a single issue third party.
The issue the Republican Party was formed around was the expansion of slavery into newly created states and territories. The Free Soil Party is a strong example of a single-issue party formed with the goal of abolishing slavery in the United States. Thirdly, factions sometimes occur within the main parties themselves. These factions are often called party splits and are extremely effective and dangerous to the outcome of elections in the two party systems. The most successful party that resulted from a party split was the Progressive or "Bull Moose" party led by former Republican President Theodore Roosevelt. The split in the party caused a three-way horse race for the White House in the Election of 1912.
Involving Progressive Roosevelt, Republican William Taft, and Democrat Woodrow Wilson. The split doomed the Republican Party and made Wilson the victor. Lastly, ideological parties have existed for many years in the Third Party System. Parties like the Communist Party, Socialist Party, Constitution Party, Libertarian Party, etc. These parties seek to change the system as a whole. Most of the ideological parties mentioned have been on the ballot for many years, but they are ineffective in the actual race.
These are the four types of Third Parties that have existed in the political realm of the United States. In the political system of the United States many barriers and obstacles exist for Third Parties. In the current style of United States politics the Media plays a crucial role in the system, and also posses numerous obstacles for Third Parties. The media often tends to focus on the "Two Party Horse Race" and neglects the third parties involved in the race. A Third Party Presidential Candidate can not enter into a televised debate unless he has at least fifteen percent of the popular vote in five major polls. Then there is the process of getting on the ballot in each individual state.
Each state sets it own quota or guidelines for the number of signatures needed to place a candidate on the ballot. Sometimes the number of signatures are numerous and unattainable for some third parties with limited resources. From a financial aspect it is extremely difficult for a third party to compete in a major election. Campaigns cost money and most of the time that money comes from private donations and matching federal funds. A Presidential Candidate must receive five percent of the popular vote in order to receive Federal Funds for the next election. Historically corporations and interest groups support the two major parties with campaign contributions and do not support third parties.
Then there are the historical and cultural factors. The United States has had a strong current Two Party System Since the election of President Abraham Lincoln and voters tend to identify with their parties. The Electoral College and its "winner take all system" makes it mentally difficult for voters to vote for third parties. People believe realistically and do not want to waste the vote they cast every four years.
Also, it is difficult to convince voters to cross party lines on Election Day. Barriers and obstacle exist that hinder the chance for third parties to be a success in a dominant Two Party System. Although the election of Lincoln in 1860 is considered the only third party presidential victory other third party bids for the White House were popular in the United States. In 1968, Alabama Governor George Wallace ran a strong campaign as an Independent Candidate. Wallace split from the Democratic Party and ran as an Independent. Wallace appealed to more Conservative Democrats and southerners that favored segregation.
Wallace took many votes away from Democratic Candidate Hubert Humphrey. Republican Richard Nixon won the Presidential Race of 1968. The election of 1980 was also a strong performance for a Third Party Candidate in Illinois Congressman John Anderson's Campaign. Anderson's political policies captured votes from unsatisfied Democrats and Republicans. John Anderson ran a moderate campaign and adopted social issues and economic issues from both parties' agendas. Later Two-term Republican President Ronald Reagan won the 1980 election.
Incumbent Jimmy Carter viewed Anderson as a threat and tried to appeal to Anderson voters. More recently the most successful Third Party Presidential Candidate has been Ross Perot. Perot mounted a very successful Third Party Campaign in 1992 were he received around twenty-percent of the popular vote in the General Election. Perot's success hurt the campaign of the Republican Incumbent Nominee George Bush. Arkansas Governor and later two term President Bill Clinton won the 1992 Presidential Race as a Democrat. In the 1996 Election Perot ran again as the Reform Party Candidate.
He received a substantial portion of the popular vote. Perot was a successful Third Party Candidate, but obstacles that third parties face became real. Such as in 1992 when he won around twenty-percent of the popular vote and failed to gather one electoral vote. A more multi-party system is necessary in a democracy as opposed to a two-party system. The multi-party system is more democratic than limiting a voter to just two alternatives. Although it is not probable in this current political situation someday a third party might become the dominant party.
The two-party system will eventually be reconstructed in the United States. The Republican Party or Democratic Party will lose popularity and a third party will take over. Before recently the Reform Party in the United States was making some substantial gains in American Politics. The Governor of Minnesota Jesse Ventura was a Reform Party Candidate when he was elected. The 1996 Reform Party Candidate Ross Perot gained enough popular vote to be the only third party to receive Federal Campaign Funds in the 2000 Election. A third party whom has the right political agenda, a charismatic candidate, and economic conditions weaken the two-party system will be successful.
Third parties that are formed with ideological views are the strongest and most appealing. They have a solid well-established Political Agenda and their views on economic and social issues are solid. These Parties are more permanent of the political spectrum, they do not place their views as moderate or in the middle. The third parties formed on ideological principles fallow their agendas.
My Political Views are most consistent with the Libertarian Party. Libertarian party fights for the personal freedoms of every American. The Libertarian Agenda includes restoring Constitutional Government, legalizing narcotics, no gun control at all, eliminating the Federal Income Tax, cut defense and spending, and running campaigns on privately donated money. The Libertarian Party believes in absolute economic and social freedom. The party believes the only role of government should be protecting people and property against injury. The party believes that government should not regulate the economy at all.
Government should only protect a business owner's property and resources. Compared with the two parties in power currently, the Libertarian Party would not be consistent with either party's agenda and is unique in its own political aspects.