Mr President Bush example essay topic

Joshua Sanchez May 7 2004 English 100 M-W Professor Hu Not so free after all Big Brothers eyes are over watching us everyday. The privacy we once had has dissipated. His focal point is in the sky like an eagle stocking its prey. The camera lenses of Big Brother dwell everywhere. Big Brother is always awake and has an eye on us. As of today, Big Brother has risen taller and mightier.

He has gained the power to control what we can have knowledge about and has infiltrated into our private lives. George Orwell's novel 1984, prophesied coming of our democracy of a negative utopia has been proven by current events. Today, the United States democracy is looking much like the totalitarian state of 1984. Tactics of persuasions to make citizens believe their economy is improving occurred in 1984 and now in ours. Big Brother regulated the media in Oceania just as America does now. Reporters fired from speaking to foreigners, lies Administrators from the party tell their citizens, imperialism to gain territory for natural resources, and the reprisal from the government from individuals who seem unorthodox.

Over the years in presidential elections, much bribery has been conducted to assure another presidential term. Citizens expect and would take pleasure in a president who would improve the economy so they could live in a place that accommodates there budget. A current event that is taking place of such an issue is with Mr. President Bush. "In an interview that aired Sunday on CBS, Woodward, a Washington Post editor, said that Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, had promised President Bush that the Saudis would cut oil prices before November to ensure the U.S. economy was strong on Election Day". (Schoen) With this on hand, many citizens with be lulled to believe Mr. Bush is doing a fantastic job with our economy, escalating to a re-election from the voters who were persuaded by Bush's plan. Of course, not everybody has heard of this prophesied event, because it never was made a real major issue that was broadcast ed worldwide through the media.

It was introduced once, then vanished so not to make a major scene. Probably when Mr. Bush seen somebody made a degrading report that may effect his re-election, he told his friend Collin Powell, chairman of the FCC, to make it disappear or a least hide it. Just as the Party did in 1984. Citizens of the U.S. have obtained the information around the world by the media. Either by the radio, television set, newspaper, or internet sources. Each one of them is censored by the government department of the FCC, which stands for the Federal Communications Commission.

Much like the ministry of truth, it regulates U.S. broadcast media and communications markets. Everything a news reporter reports a story on is looked at beforehand for censorship before it hits the television screen. If for instance he or she is doing a story on something the Party / Government wishes not to reveal to our eyes and ears, then the story never hits the screen or air. They only want you to hear what they want in other words. Since they own the press, they can do this. They follow a concept called the Authoritarian.

The Authoritarian concept is viewed as the oldest of media concepts, tracing its roots from the as far back as Gutenberg's invention of the printing press in the mid-fifteenth century. With this invention came government limitations and restrictions on something they saw could challenge their authority. "The basic principle of authoritarianism is the press is always subject to the direct of implied control of the state or sovereign. Diversity of views is seen as wasteful and irresponsible, harmful to the country's development. Under this system, the press are allowed to gather and publish news, but the news must be for 'the good of the state', and should not criticize authority or challenge the leadership in any way". (McCormick) Everything we see or hear from the press is intended to come into our conscious as a positive influence of the government.

But not everything is true. For the most part, it is falsified. For example, after the 9/11 tragedy, the news depicted a live crowd of people from the Mid East cheering in the streets. Automatically, we suddenly had a rage of hatred of any person from the Mid East. But the truth being, was what was actually being portrayed on the screen was an event that took place beforehand". The Palestinians celebrating the bombing, out on the streets, eating some cake and making funny faces for the camera.

Well, those images were shot back in 1991! Those are images of Palestinians celebrating the invasion of Kuwait!" (Carvalho) The rage that fulfilled our minds was a figment. We then started to stereotype people from the Middle East. Every one that resembled somebody from the Middles East was discriminated against and was marked by society. It was unfair and unjust, but we got the wrong perspective of them by the wrong portrayal from the media. Watching the 9/11 event on television resembles and is similar to the Two Minute Hate from the novel 1984.

Ever since that tragedy, every U.S. citizen became more patriotic. Citizens started to purchase American flags and hang them from their houses or from their cars. We started to show our passion for our country. We showed we loved our country. We were tricked to believe and forced to love America. We Loved Big Brother.

What we thought was live news that was broadcast ed was false news. Even when reports go for themselves to reveal the truth, they were denied on arrival and were fired. "It is absolutely necessary to their structure that there should be no contact with foreigners except, to a limited extent, with war prisoners and colored slaves. If he were allowed contact with foreigners he would discover that they are creatures similar to himself". (Orwell 162) In 1984, they restricted citizens to talk to foreigners for they might have gained knowledge of each others country and realize it was lies the party told them about one another prevailing fear the citizens may engage in a revolution to overthrow the government.

"Peter Arnett was fired by NBC for an interview he gave to Iraqi state television". (Jensen) Fox News' Geraldo Rivera was another reporter that was under Pentagon scrutiny in which he was shown drawing troop positions in the sand. "CNN, MSNBC and several wire services reported all day that Arnett had been asked to leave Iraq, citing Pentagon and military officials. But Fox reported that evening Rivera was still in the country. Rivera would be the second reporter to be kicked out by the Pentagon for reporting too many details". (Jensen) Individuals reporting anything that might damage the reputation of the country will be regulated.

Mr. Rivera was simply curious and wanted to reveal the truth and was regulated upon. Even if citizens hear it is the truth, they could never know, because most of what they hear is false and because they don't have a hand in the media. If citizens owned their own broadcasting system, they probably would shut us down, for we might be seen as a possible threat to the government's reputation if we reported everybody else's opinion that differs from the government view. For instances, the rumor that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction was false. "Vice President Dick Cheney told the Veterans of Foreign Wars, "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies and against us".

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told the House Armed Services Committee, "We do know that the Iraqi regime has chemical and bio logical weapons. His regime has amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons-including VX, sar in, and mustard gas". Bush stated in his weekly radio address: "We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons-the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have". (Board) "More than two months after the US occupation of Baghdad, and three months after the onset of the American invasion, the Bush administration has been unable to produce any evidence that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction".

(Board) It is obvious that the entire basis on which the White House and the American media "sold" the war was a lie. If they would " ve asked the citizens instead of congress if we should go to war, the majority would " ve disapproved with the war. Just as in the society of Oceania, the exposes nothing but lies to the citizens about the war with the other super states. I believe along with many others, that the reason why we went to war with Iraq was for its territory. American imperialism in other words. But were doing it in a subliminal way to put ourselves in a better position to gain an advantage of war grounds".

For the record, about 2% of world oil reserves lie within U.S. territory yet we consume 26% of the world's annual oil production. Even though global oil production may begin to decline within the next couple decades, the Bush energy plan projects substantial increases in U.S. oil consumption and imports in the years ahead. Where are we going to get all that oil? 65% of world oil reserves are in the Middle East. Iraq's known oil reserves number 112 billion barrels, the second largest in the world". (Simpson) By gaining Iraq territory, we gain revenue from the oil it already possessed.

While we were at war with Iraq, Iraq military personnel started to burn oil fields. They already knew from the beginning of the war that the U.S.'s presence was for the oil, and not for the inspection of weapons of mass destruction, but for American Imperialism. By coincidence, Iraq's neighbor Saudi Arabia possesses and accounts for generally most of all the oil in the world. Oil meaning the most precious natural resource, and is a necessity, for our energy. "The largest known oil reserves are in Saudi Arabia, a country whose commitment to U.S. interests is now in doubt. Yet, they keep the oil flowing but they also are channeling oil dollars to Islamic extremists and terrorists".

(Simpson) America is no doubt greedy. We want a piece of the cake as well, and we intend to do so. In a secretive way though "The plan is, by a combination of fighting, bargaining, and well-timed strokes of treachery, to acquire a ring of bases completely encircling one or other of the states, and then to sign a pact of friendship with that rival and remain on peaceful terms for so many years as to lull suspicion to sleep" (Orwell 161) Now that the U.S. has territory around Saudi Arabia, I wouldn't doubt to say, that the U.S. government will claim Saudi Arabia to posses weapons of mass destruction. Inevitability calculating to a war with Saudi Arabia.

Since we gained the advantage of the territory beside the world's largest Oil reserves, we have the advantage to gain a victory. Anybody who will disagree with the Administrators perspective that Saudi Arabia possess these weapons, will be questioned; "Why, are you a terrorist?" Just as many were questioned after the 9/11 event, the government wanted to make clear of anyone who opposed there view. Ever since the 9/11 event, the United States government has become insecure. Every thing is some how related to terrorism in one way or the other. It has gotten to the point where the government has allowed itself to make it legally capable of evading citizen's private life. After the 9/11 event, congress was introduced a bill to be past called the "Patriot Act".

It was stated for use of "To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes". (Trandahl) It was an enhanced surveillance procedure with a main focus on "Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to terrorism". (Trandahl) With this on hand, it eliminated private life of the citizens of the U.S. much like the citizens in 1984. The bill is simply to keep on check who's saying what about what.

Any degrading response from an individual about the government will be seen as a threat. Many will be persecuted and arrested as officials will tie them up with relevancy to terrorism. Anyone who contest's with the Party is seen as terrorists, unpatriotic, or unorthodox. Peter Buckley, of Oregon, a former Democratic candidate for Congress, attended a presidential appearance.

After being herded into a fenced-in free speech area, he wrote in an opinion piece for the Oregonian: 'We were not allowed anywhere near any kind of position where the president, or the media which follows him, would see or hear us. This is not America. This in not the land of the free and the home of the brave. This is some other country. I'm a patriotic American.

I want the country I was raised to believe in, a country strong enough for political discourse and debate, with leaders courageous and decent enough to have the willingness to listen to all citizens, not just those who parrot their own views... The effort being made to hide political opposition in this country is more than cowardly, it's un-American. ' (Levendosky) Mr. President Bush and his Administrators view anybody that disagrees with their view and has a dissimilar perspective of theirs, view it as terrorism. I think it's just a way to repel us away so that our voices and opinions are not to be heard.

When anti-Bush protesters marched around in front of the White House, they were moved three miles from there into a free speech zone. "When Bush travels around the United States, the Secret Service visits the location ahead of time and orders local police to set up "free speech zones" or "protest zones" where people opposed to Bush policies (and sometimes sign-carrying supporters) are quarantined. These zones routinely succeed in keeping protesters out of presidential sight and outside the view of media covering the event". (Board) Why would the president want these people out of sight and unheard? Why out of the sight of the camera of the media? Isn't this after all a democracy?

Isn't democracy defined as a government by the people? Well, Mr. President Bush seems to abolish this definition, and so does Big Brother. The only voice heard is Big Brothers. It seems like Mr. President Bush is an exact clone of Big Brother.

He regulates the media on what to let us know and what not to know. Constant lies continuously being thrown at us, and for the most part, we believe them, because the party is in possession of absolute truth. We live in such a time where it is an exact simile of a prison. Where talking to one another is prohibited, freedom of speech is restricted, and forced to believe two plus two equal five. The is every where in our society, and a thought police exist. America is not viewed as it once was.

We no longer can say America is the land of the free, because it isn't. Lady Liberty no longer stands for land of the free. America is a steal train driven by thieves that high jacked it, and we are the ones in a remote destination fueling it. Clueless on where we are going, and helpless in gaining control. The tracks are not laid out by us, but by the thieves that drive this monstrous machine..