Mr Robert Henry example essay topic

PERSUASIVE SPEECH: Outline Student: Eke ze EnubuzorInstructor: Comm 110, Fundamentals of Public Speaking Date: Title: Specific Purpose: I. Introduction A. Attention Getter 1. Story about Mr. Robert Henry a. Mr. Robert Henry is a 45-year-old corporate executive who, while preparing to go to work, complains of a severe headache and collapses in front of his wife. As he is brought into the emergency room, he is seizing. He is quickly given intravenous meds to stop this.

A computerized tomography scan reveals a devastating sub arachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery is consulted, but in their opinion the patient will never regain consciousness and neither an angiogram nor an operating room will be of benefit. Mr. Henry has a living will stipulating that he is not to be kept alive on life support in the event of severe brain injury. After extensive discussions with the neurosurgeon, his wife and family agree to withdraw him from life support. At this time, Mr. Henry is not brain dead.

Ms. Henry is then approached by organ procurement organization or OPO. The wife consents to non-heart beating donation or NHBD after further discussions with the OPO. Mr. Henry is taken to the operating room with his family in attendance, and literally put to death. His family leaves and his organs are harvested. B. Background In this speech I will allow you to realize that non-heart beating donations are barbaric and should not be part of our American modern day medicine. I will also allow you to hear the other side of this heated debate.

II. Body A. Pros NHBD, non-heart beating donation can result in a 25% increase in the number of organs available for transplant. This is a considerable increase at the present time, where the need for organs far surpasses availability and many people die while on the waiting lists. NHBD is not forced upon anyone, In the USA, people have the right to refuse any and all treatment, and they do not forfeit that right if they become incapacitated. In Mr. Henry's case, NHBD would not have been part of his death agenda if his wife did not issue it. NHBD also has many rules and regulation, for example, the dead donor rule, which prevents organ recovery for 5-mind after death.

This eliminates the chance NHBD, when in fact the patient would have auto resuscitated. This rules and many others prevent any mistakes and brings forth the best care possible. B. Cons But not only are there rules to prevent mistakes, there are rules for manipulation. This is my main problem on non-heart beating donation, NHBD. The organ procurement organization, or OPO actually rush patients off life support, not giving them a chance at life. Investigations have shown that patient on whom NHBD is performed is not really dead or that the patient has been prematurely withdrawn from ventilators so that organs can be extracted. Which bring up the topic, what is really dead?

In our Western society, although advanced, have people with many different faiths. How can the NHBD declare that there is 5 minuets between life and death. Japanese believe that there is a liminal, a dangerous time of transition, between the time when biological death occurs and the time when the transformation necessary to become an ancestor occurs. This means that a temple, body that has been "harvested" has no chance of becoming and ancestor.. Conclusion A. Summary 1. Yes, NHBD increases the number of organs available by 25%2.

Yes, there are tons of rules and regulations that guide NHBD 3. Yes, you " re saving lives 4. But, is it worth killing someone in the process

Bibliography

1. Institute of Medicine Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Procurement. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1997.
2. De Vita MA, Snyder JV, Gren vik A: History of organ donation by patients with cardiac death. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1993, 3: 113-129.
3. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal, and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office 1981.
4. Lock M: Death in technological time: locating the end of meaningful life. Med Anthropol Q 1996, 10: 575-600.