Muslim People In Many Countries example essay topic
Employed by United Press International in 1978, he soon transferred to the New York Times and covered the Syrian destruction of that country's own town of Hama, the Israeli Lebanese invasion, the massacre of Palestinians in refugee camps, the evacuation of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, etc. In 1995, he became the foreign affairs columnist for the New York Times with carte blanche -- unlimited travel budget and no supervision as to content. He has written two books and collected three Pulitzer Prizes. In his current job, Friedman writes a 740-word column twice a week. It appears in many of the world's newspapers and on the Web. This latest book, Longitudes and Attitudes, is a compendium of his more recent columns and a diary of supporting incidents.
The text relates to the theme that has consumed him in his career: the failure of the Arab nation to develop, democratize, and compete properly with the West. This theme is given point by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the attack of 9/11. Friedman's ideas are presented primarily through many columns that he had written for he New York Times. Their datelines stretch from December 15, 2000 to April 20, 2003 and from Jerusalem, Israel to Peshawar, Pakistan. In this book, Friedman presents a coherent picture of forces in the Middle East that have led to the Israeli- Palestinian confrontation and to bin Laden and his group of terrorists. Friedman's articles describe meetings, discussions, and arguments he had with people at all levels of society through out the Middle East.
From his extensive travels and through dynamic interactions with the people he derived intense insights into how 9/11 came about, why, and what should be done about it. His arguments and conclusions are well thought through, so much that they draw opponents to reason with him. Of Jewish religion, he still wears the American Flag on his sleeve and criticizes Israel for the West Bank Settlements. Wherever he goes in Muslim lands, he appears before editorial boards and argues his conclusions. When he turns to the conflict in the Holy Land, Friedman is partially right.
As he see the Palestinians have learned some things in Zionism, but they have still yet to learn the lesson that the best is the enemy f the good and that all wise negotiations mean settling for what you can get now rather than what you want one day. While Friedman is dismayed when Arabs tell him "that the Jews control the US government", he also admits that although Israeli settlement policy is "insane", President Bush can do nothing about it, because that "would inevitably force a clash that with US Jews, whose cotes and donations he needs to protect his GOP majority in the house". Friedman was extremely right in saying September 11th was an atrocious crime that had no plausible explanation or even justification or even any real origin in oppression and injustice. As he saw, Osama bin Laden was a bloodthirsty religious maniac, and his followers were deluded fanatics for whom murder was some obscure compensation for failure. He believes America is a great country and one of the things that makes America great is we accept and embrace diversity.
He talks about the many different ethnic groups represented at a concert at his daughter's school. He celebrates the ethnic diversity in a group of American Special Forces. He believes that the problem we are up against is many Muslim nations are not being trained to hate. In Saudi Arabia, women are not allowed to drive. Meanwhile, unemployment is at thirty percent. Thomas Friedman's talked to Muslim people in many countries.
He sees fewer problems in countries where democracy is being encouraged (e.g. Turkey, India). Part of the reason this is everyone's problem is satellite television, the internet, and other modern technology have made it possible for few individuals to created big problems. The situation between Israel and Palestine is also a big theme in his writings. He sees that region as the key to the future of the rest of the world.
He blames Arafat for walking away from a genuine chance at peace and thus causing Sharon to be elected. He blames Sharon for insisting on having Israeli settlements in Palestinian Territory. He expresses horror at Arafat's legitimizing of suicide bombers. He talked to people on the street, along with some world leaders / in most Muslim country people genuinely believe that four thousand Jews were warned not to work in the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11th. One Pakistani father explained to his children why logistically it couldn't possibly be true.
He later got a message from their school that his kids needed to stop challenging that story or they would be ostracized by their classmates. He pointed out that although the Internet makes the world a smaller place, it also spreads anger and hate because you can be selective and only listen to the people who agree with your own viewpoint. He expresses hope that we will rise to the challenges of the new Century without destroying ourselves. This is an important book, giving some interesting insights and perspectives on the new world facing us after September 11th. For all Friedman's enthusiasm this book has a bleak flavor. He may be wrong by saying September 11th was the beginning of World War, but he is all too right in saying the task of our nation building in Afghanistan is likely to defeat the Americans.