Napster Software User Agreement example essay topic
The music companies want the courts to shut the server permanently. The law stated that whether online or offline, it is illegal to copy and distribute someone elses work in a way that deprives them of on income. That means anyone getting or distributing music over the Internet is considered breaking the law. There are also people who are pro-Napster who want the search engine to be shut down too. A statistic was compiled using Sounds can, an objective reporting process that measures actual retail and online prices. According to that statistics, it was revealed that sales were off 4 percent in areas near colleges and universities.
Napster is very well known among college students. More than 100 universities had banned its students from downloading MP 3 songs. During an interview with a record company, the question Why shouldnt music be free was asked. The response was, If recording artists didnt have to pay $50 to $200 an hour for studio costs, $1,000 or more for mastering, $5,000 to $50,000 in radio promotion, and thousands more in related costs, they could arguably give stuff away.
Nevertheless, someone who spent 10 years struggling financially, invested thousands in equipment, thousands mor in lessons and demos, and pursued countless hours of creative work just might want to be compensated for that effort (Stopnapster pg. 1). As one of Napsters fan, I feel that Napster. com should not be closed down. The search engine is used to download songs and saved for my personal use. I personally wouldnt want to purchase a CD if there were just one or two songs that are good. Besides, Napster gives me the chance to meet other music lovers like myself, who share the same interest. Fans, like Napster because it combines the existing elements of the online music experience into a single application that allows people to talk about what music they like and trade files.
Napster software user agreement says, Copying or distributing unauthorized files may violate United States and foreign copyright laws. Compliance with the copyright law remains your responsibility (Sullivan pg. 2). Since its clearly stated in the agreement, I think that Napster should not be responsible. Despite the lawsuits, Napster. com should not be banned for copyright infringement. I think that Napsters motives and intentions are truly beneficial to upcoming new artists and noncommercial users around the globe. Grover, Roland.
LOOK WHO'S AFTER NAPSTER Business Week. October 1 2000: 92 Ebso Host. October 5 2000. Kahn, Jeremy.
Proving Napster Legal Is a Tough Job for Boxes Fortune October 2 2000: 50 Ebso Host. October 5, 2000. Stop Napster. Frequently Asked Questions. StopNapster. com. August 3, 2000 October 5, 2000.