National Minimum Drinking Age Act example essay topic

Can I See Your ID? The introduction of young people to beverage alcohol varies considerably in different cultural settings. In many societies, the age at which the purchase and public consumption of beverage alcohol becomes legal is also the age at which other 'adult' rights and responsibilities are bestowed. What is neither clear nor consistent is the age at which this should occur.

Communities recognize the capacity for alcohol to be abused, particularly by young and inexperienced college students. The imposition of a legal drinking age limit is one aspect of a society's desire to reduce the potential for harms associated with inappropriate drinking patterns. Believe it or not, students who are under 21 do drink. Every weekend, students armed with fake IDs go out to intoxicate their worries away while at the same time attempting to avoid the dreaded Minor In Possession tickets and the Department of Public Safety.

Tougher punishments and regulations seem to have little effect on the number of people who are willing to risk legal ramifications for a drink. The government can help ease the fruitless struggle between students and University officials by lowering the lawful drinking age to 18. At the ripe age of 18, you must enlist to Selective Service. This, meaning that you must tell the government that you are a man now and that you can fight for the country you live in if needed. Seeing how I can go die for my country at the green age of 18; I feel that I should be able to have a drink when I want to.

It may seem unfair to many observers to allow 18-20 year olds to marry, to have children, to own cars, homes and firearms and to be financially and socially independent, and yet to be legally prohibited from drinking a glass of wine in a restaurant, or even a glass of champagne at their own wedding. Current laws regarding underage drinking do not make sense. In 1984, Congress enacted the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, which required states to enforce a drinking age of 21 or risk losing some federal highway funds (Engs). The act was originally established to prevent inexperienced drivers from crossing state lines to drink legally and driving back drunk to their home states (Engs). However, the genius behind the minimum age act does not apply to the University.

Most students do not have cars on campus and those that do are often over 21. Moreover, drunken driving laws that did not exist in 1984 proved to be successful deterrents. Normally one does not reach the legal drinking age during college until about their junior or senior year. Yet, through personal experience and research have shown that more drinking is done in the first years of college. A lot of excess baggage comes with the first year in college, and many students are overwhelmed by and under prepared for the excitement and risks that they will encounter during their first year at a university. From classes to sex, from relationships to drinking, from religion to social clubs, students decide the order in which to try them.

Many will notice that there are only laws governing one of these activities, thus drinking becomes the first social pastime in which students engage. The thrill of entering a college bar where mom and dad cannot bear witness to the illegal activity of underage drinking can excite somebody, but it can also be responsible for his ride in the ambulance later that night. The solution that lawmakers and people in power find when those who are underage get sick or die from the effects of alcohol is to tighten the reigns on the sovereignty of bars by restricting the customers whom they can honor to a specific age group -- a hypocritical act of discrimination. Their solution is wrong, as laws will still be broken and people 20 years, 364 days and younger will continue to consume alcohol. The answer to the problem of underage drinking is not to add more restrictions. Rather, it is simple: get rid of the 'underage' part.

A study printed in the Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education has found that the lower drinking age has not really posed a problem for underage drinkers (96). This study also found that only 1.5% of their sample (6 students) agreed that the availability of alcohol was presenting a problem for them and their drinking habits (College Health Survey 96). 'Raising the drinking age has had little positive impact on the university population in regard to alcohol consumption level' (College Health Survey 96). The increased drinking age now forces colleges and universities to spend money, which is drawn from grants, government funding, tuition money, and taxes, on an issue that they never paid much attention to before. The Combating Underage Drinking program is just one of the many programs set aside for this cause (United States Justice). This program gives each state $360,000 to put to programs for the prevention of underage drinking (United States Justice).

With the thrill of breaking the law gone and the access to the bar granted, people, especially college students, in the 18 to 20 age group would be treated like the adults that the U.S. Constitution says they are. A wave of moderate drinkers would emerge because it would become a societal norm for adults to enter a bar and have a drink at their own discretion. All of the assumptions that college students and their contemporaries are not responsible enough to drink legally are fabricated by those who are worried that a lowered drinking age will lead to a greater number of alcoholics. Not only has that not been proven, but it is also intended to scare the general public. The fear that a person of voting age cannot responsibly drink has become more widespread among the baby boomer and older generations, but for no apparent reason other than to impose a twisted sense of 'morality' on a younger generation to which they were not subjected.

They will tell you that times have changed and that is why one cannot legally drink at 18 anymore. Nevertheless, college freshmen are college freshmen, whether they entered school in 1968 or 2002. They will engage in the same activities, do the same amusing things, study as much (or as little) and party as hard. True, times are more complicated, but when certain rights are the norm, then tragedies such as fatalities from drinking and driving can be avoided. Our society must not look to punish and restrict, but to promote and accept. Treating legal adults like actual adults is the first step.

Furthermore, lowering the drinking age would be economical. If the present illogical law were updated, DPS would no longer have to nag University students across campus about underage drinking. Also, local retailers would have less pressure to spot underage buyers using false identification. Instead, the University and the city could re-invest these currently wasted resources into more productive efforts.

University authorities seem to have forgotten that students will illegally drink no matter how many cops are running after them with tickets in their hands. Yet the same pointless cycle repeats itself every weekend, every year on into infinity. Work CitedEngs, Ruth C., Professor, Applied Health Sciences, Why the Drinking age should be lowered: An Opinion based upon Research, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, 1998 Ruth Engs, along with other that she referrers to, have studied underage drinking for almost to decades. She has performed numerous studies pen pointing the pros and cons of underage drinking in a college atmosphere. Being a professor at a major university has given her the perfect environment to study such subjects. Wechsler, Henry, Ph. D., Barbara A. Moeykens, William De Jong, Ph. D., Enforcing the Minimum Drinking Age Law: A Survey of College Administrators and Security Chiefs, November 2000, Harvard School of Public Health, web Wechsler and his colleagues have conducted survives and studies.

Everyone from the U.S. government to the Mothers Against Drunk Driving have back their research. After reading a few of their articles, I feel that their outcomes are very well ground and based on immense research. De Jong, William, Ph. D., Linda M. Langford, Sc. D., Journal of Studies on Alcohol A Typology for Campus-Based Alcohol Prevention: Moving toward Environmental Management Strategies, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118 Dejong and Langford's journals are read all over the country by top personnel in almost every field imaginable. Many other universities have used their studies to try to solve the underage drinking problem that has become a number one concern of college nation wide. 'Declaration 6.1 and 6.2. ,' Americans for a Society Free from Age Restrictions., , (7 November 1998).

'Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey. ' Journal of American College Health V. 46 N. 2 (1997): 55-66. United States Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Press Release: 'Justice Department to Help States Combat Underage Drinking,' Washington, April 1998.