Need For The Death Penalty example essay topic
It goes against the Constitution which states that there will be no cruel and unusual punishment. There is nothing crueler than killing a person. A perfect example of the death penalty going awry is the state of Illinois. Former governor George Ryan has put a stay on all executions. This came as a result of finding thirteen death row inmates not guilty of their convicted crimes. Also, by staying executions, Illinois is not spending the three hundred million dollars to almost three hundred men and women to death row in the past twenty two years (Ryan 14).
That is a ridiculous amount of money to send only three hundred to death row, making it approximately one million dollars a person. Those people make up only two percent of all convicted murders in Illinois (Ryan 14). This leaves ninety eight percent of killers in jail. Why are only three hundred people acceptable to kill when the other ninety eight percent are not? In New York as well, prosecutors have only sought capital punishment in twelve out of one hundred ninety eight possible cases. They have found that the penalty of life without the chance of parole works well, and have come to prefer it (Shipp).
Without the philosophy of life without parole, inmates who are tried for the death penalty are tried unfairly. In the year 2000 in Illinois, eight out of ten inmates sentenced to capital punishment were minorities (Mendieta). "Minority inmates constitute 83% of those who have thus far been shown to be wrongfully convicted". One study has shown that people who murdered white people were found more likely to be sentenced to death than people who have murdered African Americans (The Death Penalty is Wrong. Dead Wrong)". Between 1930 and 1990, 4,016 persons were executed in the United States.
Of these, 2,129 (or 53 percent) were black" (Bedau). But race is still not the only discrimination. "During the 1980's and aerially 1990's, only about 1 percent of all those on death row were women, even though women commit about 15 percent of all criminal homicides" (Bedau). Discrimination is increasingly less if money is a factor.
Chances are that one will not get convicted for the death penalty. .".. Associate justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said: "I have yet to see a death case... in which the defendant was well-represented at trial" (Shipp). The same if they have money goes if the prisoner has information for the government, or is a member of the mob. If the murderer was smart enough to travel to a country that opposes capital punishment, the government would most likely reduce that person's sentence to life without the possibility of parole to bring them back to the United States (Shipp). Many people who are supporters of the death penalty say that it's a successful deterrent.
But this isn't true because the death penalty is administered very inconsistently and arbitrarily. "Only a small proportion of first-degree murders is sentenced to death, and even fewer are executed" (Bedau). There are also several states that have a lower criminal rate without using capital punishment. For example Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan all get along just fine without the use of the death penalty. Also. ".. all other Western industrial countries get along quite well without killing their citizens" (Ryan). There are many judges that are against the use of capital punishment as well.
"A federal judge in Vermont has become the second magistrate in two months to say the current national death penalty law is unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge William Sessions ruled in Vermont that the federal Death Penalty Act does too little to ensure that the fights of defendants in death-penalty cases are safeguarded" (Second Judge Rules Against Death Penalty). Richard Dieter, who is the director of the Death Penalty Information Center, has said that there is still a great amount of unsettlement, especially after September 11th, about our death penalty (Willing). Another popular argument about capital punishment is that it offers closure for the victim's family. For many families this just simply isn't true.
Katie Lowenstein, the daughter of a murder victim, agrees. "The idea that the execution of the murderer will heal the crimes is false. Nothing is going to bring my father back" (Mendieta). There are also many more examples. One would be Marietta Jaeger who, after the murder of her seven year old daughter Susie, had this to say", In my case, my own daughter was such a gift of joy and sweetness and beauty, that to kill someone in her name would have been to violate and profane the goodness of her life; the idea is offensive and repulses me" (The Death Penalty is Wrong. Dead Wrong).
There are countless more examples that show how even heart broken, devastated families of the murdered person that it is inconceivable to murder the murderer. How anyone could think there is justice in killing anyone is astounding. The murderer is wrong, but the government is even more wrong to kill those people instead of forcing them to live day after day in a tiny cell to think about, and hopefully, feel remorseful about killing. Ending the lives of these criminals is letting them have the easy way out, which is certainly not what they deserve at all. The government needs to imprison these criminals because there is always a possibility that the person convicted is not guilty and if they were killed the government could do nothing at all to console those poor families of the wrong victim.
Bibliography
Bedau, Hugo Adam. "The Case Against the Death Penalty". July 1992.
ACLU Free Reading Room. 14 May 2003.
Mendieta, Ana. "Death Penalty Still Unfair, Report Says". Chicago Tribune. 31 Jan 2001.
Ryan, Bill. 'Abolish the Death Penalty. ' Chicago Tribune. 05 Jan 2001: 14.
s second Judge Rules Against Death Penalty. ' Christian Century. 09 Oct 2002: 15.
Shipp, E.R. 'Justice's Doubts Bolster Case Against Death Penalty. ' Daily News. 10 July 2001.
Willing, Richard. 'Fight Against Death Penalty Gains Ground. ' USA Today. 11 Feb 2002: 3 a.
The Death Penalty is Wrong. Dead Wrong. 01 Aug 1999.
14 May 2003.