Number Of American Troops In Iraq example essay topic
' The 2003 Person of the Year package, which hits newsstands Monday, focuses on a 12-person artillery survey unit stationed in Iraq to tell the story of the American soldier. Two Time journalists embedded with the platoon were injured in a grenade attack this month. Three soldiers with the unit -- Marquette Whiteside, Billie Grimes and Ronald Buxton -- are shown on the cover. The magazine glorifies soldiers but not the Bush administration for putting them in Iraq, calling troops 'the bright sharp instrument of a blunt policy,' and leaving it to scholars to debate 'whether the Bush doctrine is the most muscular expression of national interest in a half-century. ' The justification for a U.S. military presence in Iraq has been widely questioned, as coalition forces have found no weapons of mass destruction, which President Bush had argued Saddam was stockpiling. Guerrilla attacks against U.S. and allied forces stationed there have escalated over the months since May 1 when the president declared an end to major combat.
More coalition troops died in November than in any other month: 104, including 79 Americans. 'A force intensively trained for its mission finds itself improvising at every turn, required to exercise exquisite judgment in extreme circumstances,' the magazine said. 'They complain less about the danger than the uncertainty -- they are told they " re going home in two weeks, and then two months later they have not moved. ' The Pentagon has said it expects to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq to just over 100,000 by May.
Time magazine knows the risks first hand. On the evening of December 10, Time writer Michael Weisskopf's right hand was blown off and photographer James Nachtway was hit with shrapnel when a grenade landed on their humvee as the platoon was stuck in Baghdad traffic. Weisskopf is recovering at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., and Nachtway is in New York. In 2001, when then-New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was picked as Time's Person of the Year for leading the city's response to the September 11 terror attacks, critics suggested Osama bin Laden should have been featured as the top news maker. Kelly said Saddam was not considered this year because 'he was on the losing side of this conflict,' and it was unclear how much he was leading the insurgency.