Oct 10 example essay topic
Numerous descriptions of how they died, not so much who killed them or why. - No interview sources, just statistics on how many Americans died. No statistics on other troops. Very biased. - In the back, pg. 14 5 - "Roadside Bombs Kill 3 Soldiers and a Translator in Iraq" - Oct. 8, pg. 18 (f. p. = Californian recall) - Story tells very little about the actually killings, only one paragraph really - Links together otherwise differing pieces of information - protests where they chant "God is Great" along with "You Americans are afraid of him", implying that the differences are due to religion more than anything else - Along with the anti-Americanism are paragraphs stating what achievements America has had for the day, implying ideas about religion before explaining they were quelled.
- Uses only one quote, but completely disagrees with it a sentence later, stating "conditions had improved since Hussein was ousted". 6 - "Car Bomb Kills 8 at police station in Baghdad slum" - Oct. 10, f. p. - brief mentions of anti-American behaviour - uses language to imply that assassination of Spanish diplomat was not because of their support to America, but "suspicion immediately fell" when one American soldier is killed. Also uses a quote from one Iraqi officer to support Americans. 7 - "Iraqi shiite anger raises new fears for U.S. soldiers" - Oct. 11, f. p. - uses words like "seething throng" in describing the anti-Americans - tries to calm down the idea of anti-American feelings but quoting the group as "thugs" and quoting an American official as calling them a tiny group. - states that 'accounts differ'. First tells the Colonel's side of the story (4 paragraphs), goes on to say that the Americans might " ve fired first (1 paragraph), but goes back to say that it was an ambush, refuting the fact that it might " ve been the American's fault. - brings in ideas of religion - concern for "establishing an Islamic state" 8 - "Car bomb kills 6 at Baghdad Hotel, At least 35 hurt" - Oct. 13, f. p. - very unreliable - quotes General Krivo again, and disputes his claims with witnesses, but doesn't focus on these alternate stories - only uses army sources, and quotes them as saying everything is "back to normal" - keeps Iraqi side of the story to a minimum: "There was suddenly a great explosion" - keeps information on treating the wounded to a minimum, discusses very little the consequences - includes an extra couple paragraphs on shiite pilgrimage as a form of propaganda, mentionining it was 'forbidden' and 'banned' by hussein numerous times 10 - "Attacks North of Baghdad Kill 3 G.I.'s and Barely Miss Governor of Iraqi Province" - Oct 14, pg. 10 - Krivo 17 - "Anti-US Cleric Harangues, But Iraq's Shiites Heed Four Ayatollahs" - Oct 22, pg. 6 - overuse of ideas of religion - in the Religion section - tries to restate ideas that America has already done wonders for their religion - pilgrimage to Najaf - links religion with the ayatollahs, plays down ideas of sadr - portrays sadr as another tyrant, and tries to show that he is too young to influence - smoking a cigarette.