One Thousand Music Files example essay topic

Author's Note: This was originally an informative speech and was some portions were edited for time purposes, so some modifications may be required. If you? re using this as a speech, it will be around eight minutes long. Word Count: 1,054 Introduction Most people have an idea of what file sharing is, but they? re not exactly sure why it's such a big deal. Some of them may even be aware of the fact that file sharing is punishable by law and carries a fine of up to and including $20,000.

Since the introduction of Napster in 1999, copyrighted music has been illegally duplicated more than eight trillion times. In recent weeks, the Recording Industry Association of America has filed more than three hundred lawsuits against American consumers who illegally downloaded copyrighted music. File sharing has long been a problem for the recording industry, which has only begun an uphill battle to alleviate illegal file sharing. In addition to the lawsuits, the RIAA has employed the use of specialized computer applications in its quest to seek out and hold accountable file sharing users. Naturally, millions of file sharing people are not happy with the RIAA's recent proceedings and have made the resolve to retain their right to? free? music. The biggest file-sharing networks have vowed to continue to keep music? free? while protecting their users from the RIAA's retribution.

Body The origins of file sharing Prior to file sharing, music lovers were forced to pay nearly twenty dollars for an album. Some of them simply accepted the prices and went on to enjoy their favorite music while others chose to purchase recordable audio cassettes in addition to albums and copy an entire album onto one cassette. This copying was just as illegal then as file sharing is now. The only difference between file sharing and copying an album onto a cassette is file sharers run a greater risk of being caught.

Federal officers weren? t going to burst through someone's home because they were copying an album. The crime was nearly impossible for record companies to prove because the RIAA had no way of detecting when and where an album was being copied. That is, until Napster arrived in January of 1999. Napster was originally comprised of a massive network and three hundred servers, which gained instant popularity. By the end of July of 1999, approximately twenty million people had registered with Napster's services, and an estimated half million were signing up daily. Consequently, album sales dropped by nearly thirty percent that summer, and sales continued to plummet well into the holiday season.

By the end of the year, sales of records, CDs and mini discs had dropped an additional thirty-five percent. Sales of walkman's, stereo CD players and personal CD players decreased by three percent that year as well. On the other hand, sales of recordable CDs and MP 3 players increased by a staggering one hundred sixty-nine percent in 1999, and the demand for these devices soon overwhelmed the supply. Why it's a problem It may or may not be obvious why illegal file sharing is a problem. Millions of people see nothing wrong with downloading a song or two without paying for the download.

It's a problem because it causes the price of albums to increase considerably for non-file sharing consumers. The average music-loving American pays approximately from twenty-two dollars to thirty dollars for each album he or she purchases. This wasn? t the case in the years prior to Napster's debut. The average American paid from eighteen to twenty dollars for each album, with the exceptions of anthologies and double-album sets.

It creates a problem for the file sharing user. Most people have morals, or appear to, and constant stealing might compromise those morals, which ultimately leads to other forms of theft in some cases. It causes a problem for the music industry because 1) the record companies lose money behind slumping album sales 2) the? people behind the scenes? at the record companies lose their jobs because the record companies cannot turn a decent profit, and 3) the quality of artists? music is affected. Record companies that are facing grave financial circumstances force their artists to compromise their artistry and produce the most popular forms of music, which may irritate a large portion of some artists? fan bases and cause the record companies to lose even more money. What action has been taken to thwart file sharing?

Ironically, the RIAA has been slow to take action. In fact, the RIAA really didn? t begin it's retaliation until late 2002, when it accused four college students of downloading more than one thousand music files. One of the students ended up getting expelled from his respective university while the other three were required to pay heavy legal fines. Recently, the RIAA pursued litigation against an elderly woman who downloaded a few Nat King Cole and Bing Crosby music files, and most notably a twelve year old girl who downloaded Britney Spears? entire catalog. The RIAA said it felt justified in exemplifying these individuals because doing so appeared to be the most effective deterrent for file sharers. Indeed, recent surveys indicate that at least two percent of the American population no longer participates in the practice.

What networks are doing to protect their users? Naturally, the file sharing networks are not happy with the action that has been taken to combat file sharing. Sharman Networks, the company that owns Kazaa said in a statement that it would be upgrading its anti-virus applications to prevent the RIAA from planting infected music files in its system. Also, Sharman Networks and other companies are suing the RIAA, saying that its recent lawsuits are unlawful and violate the right to freedom of expression.

There's not much a file sharing users can do to protect themselves, other than to put their faith in the action that the networks are taking. Others continue to download songs in blatant protest. Conclusion In summation, most people have come into contact with file sharing of some sort, and whether or not they didn? t intend to harm anyone, they did. File sharing, as much as people may like it, is illegal. It's a crime to download a song or several without charge. Aside from being illegal, file sharing affects the livelihood of people who do not earn the seven or eight figure salaries and depend upon the success of the record companies and their artists.

Bibliography

Vaidhyanathan, Siva. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York University Press, 2003.
Cavazos, Edward A. Cyberspace and the law: your rights and duties in the on-line world / Edward A. Cavazos, Gavino Morin. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c 1994.
Fishman, Stephen. The copyright handbook: how to protect and use written works. Berkeley, Calif. : Nolo Press, 1992.
Rowland, Judith. The ultimate violation. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday, 1985.
Barnes, James J. Authors, publishers, and politicians: the quest for an Anglo-American copyright agreement. Columbus, Ohio. : State University Press 1974.
Howard, Rish. File Sharing News & Reviews. 8 Feb. 2003.
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. Fishman, Stephen. Rowland, Judith. The ultimate violation. Howard, Rish. 8 Feb. 2003.