Only Bad Point Of The Book example essay topic
She also researches her facts and notes extensively, so her books are very, if not completely accurate. Miracle at Philadelphia is, plainly, an in-depth look at the forming of the Constitution of the United States from an "onlooker" point-of-view. It chronicles the beginning of the Congress, where the delegates decided to completely rewrite the Articles of Confederation instead of amend them, to the end, where the Bill of Rights was added to persuade opponents of the Constitution to ratify it. It also has the speeches, arguments, and fiery debates of the Congress in a first-person view, and describes the oratories, such as Patrick Henry, with an excellent tenacity. Mrs. Bowen wrote Miracle at Philadelphia to show the common person that even though the Constitution may seem to be perfect at the present day, the process in which it was created was not. This book differs from all others like it because it has the first-person views that Catherine Bowen includes, instead of a "research stereotype" like all others are.
She has the oratories of the Constitution in full-blaze, instead of a doctor or a researcher explaining what it was or what they were trying to say. She also wrote the book to show the humanism of the founding fathers and how they were just people like everyone else, who wanted things to be satisfactory for everyone, and the struggles they put up for their own personal home state. Mrs. Bowen has absolutely blown the competition out of the water with this book. It's an accurate, although sometimes not spellbinding, presentation of a subject that can be interesting at points for everyone. The book was very clearly written, with an excellent thesis. Bowen paced herself well, and provided a very balanced, two-sided look at the building of our highest law-governing document.
The information in the book is very clearly presented, and is of a very high caliber in its accuracy. The index was very helpful, and allowed for the finding of certain pieces of information quite easy. She has provided an accurate bibliography, and it is well documented and sourced. The book was of a very high caliber; there are only several things that can be said to be flaws. One of these things is the overall curiosity of the book, in that in some parts of the book, one may have found it to be, bluntly, a cure for insomnia. The detail of the book can get so intimate, that the book itself slows almost to a stop.
The time spent reading this book was partially worth it, only because the book was so slow that in some points, one would find oneself wanting to suddenly turn the page out of a pure struggle to keep moving. The only way to make this book better would be to make the book move along a little faster. In conclusion, the book was an excellent portrayal of this historical event of the Constitutional Congress. The good points of the book heavily outweighed the bad, because the only bad point of the book is that it was slow, as stated in the last paragraph. Mrs. Catherine Drinker Bowen absolutely succeeds in her book, showing the first-person view as in all of her books, that brings this event to life like never bef.