Paragon Learning Style Indicator Assessment example essay topic
But, it does, provide the necessary steps in helping me examine myself in determining me compatibility with career and self-development choices and options. It also provides the power to formulate strategies, which can market my group or myself effectively and help me make the best of my opportunities. It is said that the first step to any self-assessment is to analyze our career and planning processes. A Self-assessment is also known to take many forms from writing in journals to weekly self- evaluations".
There are any number of well-documented personality and stylistic qualities that will, in combination with the attributes of other people, likely create certain kinds of team dynamics. Some of these qualities could include introversion / extroversion, need for control, need for affiliation, need for power, need for achievement, dogmatism, self-esteem, emotional intelligence, learning style, and cognitive style and complexity". (2002) To begin my first assessment I used the Myers Briggs Assessment, which helped me gather data about my inner emotional, mental and psychological behaviors. Myers Briggs Type Indicator Instrument "was developed by Isabel Briggs Myers and her mother, Katharine Cook Briggs.
Their aim was to create a tool to indicate, validate, and put to practical use C.G. Jung's work on psychological types. Jung (1875-1961) was a Swiss psychiatrist whose book Psychological Types was an outgrowth of his efforts to understand individual differences among people... understanding psychological type and appreciating differences". (2003) The Myers Briggs Indicator can be used for: "Self-understanding and developments, Career development and exploration, Organization development, Team building, Management and leadership training, Problem solving, Relationship counseling, Education and curriculum development, Academic counseling, Diversity and multicultural training. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument is a self-report questionnaire designed to make Jung's theory of psychological types understandable and useful in everyday life. MBTI Instrument results identify valuable differences between normal, healthy people, differences that can be the source of much misunderstanding and miscommunication".
(2003) I took a Qualitative analysis test by Myers Briggs and Jung Type Indicator Instrument, which consisted of a 72-line personality test. This test was based on the Jung-Myers Briggs typological approach to personality. After taking the test my personality was defined as a, "distinctively expressed extrovert, very expressed intuitive personality, moderately expressed feeling personality, moderately expressed judging personality". (1998) I also took a Risk Attitude Profiler by Jung-Myers Briggs, which divided my risk style into two risk types: primary and secondary. My primary type stated that I was ponderous, which means, "You are self-confident, firmly convinced of the rightness of your beliefs. People who do not share your opinions irritate you and you do not mask your annoyance with their views, which appear wrong to you.
You are inclined to give advice to others to keep them from making mistakes but you yourself do not like being given unsolicited advice". (1998) My second risk attitude said, "You are a steady and rational person. You can define goals precisely, distinguishing between what you really need and what you can easily do without. You are able to learn from previous experience. You feel and value the present and think seriously about the future. You take your projects seriously, evaluating carefully their importance to you as well as the feasibility of their implementation.
You are capable and disposed to evaluate soberly your possibilities within the context of various circumstances. You consider the consequences of your actions. You have the courage to make a decision but also, when necessary, to reject it. Having made a decision you don't hesitate, but carry it out energetically". (1998) The second assessment tool where I successfully gather learning data was the Paragon Learning Style indicator assessment given to me by a class member. "The Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI) is a 48 item self-administered survey that provides a very reliable indication of learning style and cognitive preference.
It uses the four Jungian dimensions (i. e, introversion / extroversion, intuition / sensation, thinking / feeling, and judging / perceiving ) that are also used by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Murphy Meisgeir Type Indicator, and the Kersey-Bates Temperament Sorter. But this is the only instrument that can be self-scored and works with ages 9-adult". (Shindler, 2000) After successfully assessing my personal learning styles using both the Myers Briggs and the Paragon Learning style survey, I realized that both surveys were very similar. The only difference was that the Myers Briggs assessment allowed me to conduct a Risk Attitude provider on myself. I was able to relate a part of my personal behavior to the risk assessment. After finishing the risk provider I realized it analyzed me right, when it stated how I interact with people.
It helped me notice that I do tend to ignore others who I feel aren't listening to my opinions and views. The assessment also stated I sometimes second-guess my decisions, and I must say, I do think before I proceed with anything, good or bad! Now, for the Paragon Learning style survey I had two, four letter learning style types. I was an ESFJ and an ENFJ: ESFJ is an Extrovert, Sensate, Feller and Judge, and an ENFJ, which are an Extrovert, Intuitive, Feller and Judger. My ESFJ style is described as a "Warm-hearted, talkative, popular, conscientious, born cooperators, active committee members. Need harmony and may be good at creating it.
Always doing something nice for someone. Work best with encouragement and praise. Main interest is in things that directly and practically help people's lives", and my ENFJ style is described as a "Responsive and responsible. Generally feel real concern for what others think or want, and try to handle things with due regard for the other person's feelings. Can present a proposal or lead a group discussion with ease and tact.
Sociable, popular, sympathetic. Responsive to praise and criticism". (Shindler) Both the ESFJ and ENFJ represent me, I find that I always go out of my way to make people like me, sometimes this has work for me and sometimes it has worked against me. I have quite a few instances where I felt I wasn't appreciated after going out of my way to help someone and what bothered me the most was that I worried about what that person thought of me when I had, had enough. I don't feel like I am popular enough, I love to make new friends and I love to make a lasting impression on others. Sometimes I am too critical and judgmental of myself.
I hate. I do consider myself a hard worker who but in extra hours to get things done. Mostly, I know I love praise; as a kid I was very competitive, sometimes just a little too much. I would also like to improve the way I respond to criticism, sometimes I look at as a tool to help me improve myself and then sometimes, I look beyond that scope and take comments too personal. The strengths from being a Extrovert, Sensate, Intuitive, Feller and Judger, is that I have the ability to be thoughtful, caring and I definitely am a hard worker, some opportunities I would like to improve are to be more Sociable, networking is the key to success and I sometimes loss contact with my associates and feel uncomfortable about re-gathering with them to ask for a favor and I wear my feeling on my shoulder. Lastly, the PLSI assessment has allowed me to look at the way I gather data and helped me manipulate my thoughts and feeling line by line.
I have started a journal and have been picking apart all elements of my individuality to help me achieve great success. There are many effective tools to conquer your self-assessing learning style. As a result from performing these assessment reflections and understanding Type Indicators, I was able to analyze my critical thinking abilities, my life skills and myself by using two popular self-assessing learning tools the Myers Briggs and Paragon Learning Style indicators. I incorporated these two learning theories into my Self-Assessment and Reflection of my life, they both are helping me connect with my inner abilities and inner strengths. I hope that by performing the following learning assessments, I will reach full understanding of my identity and how to better interact with others. More and more companies are now turning towards building effective working teams and interaction and direction from and with others will rely heavily on how you assess your attitudes and information.
Like Kraus nick notes, "Paying attention to individual learning styles is a way to understand others and recognize the talent and skills each person brings to the table. All employees have to be sensitive to differences among their compatriots. A team cannot have an effective process if it has only a single perspective, she added. To enhance that understanding and to create balance, training teams chart where their learning styles are dominant and where they " re not". (2000) I feel all Self-Assessments have one thing in common and that is to bring out the best in your individuality and show you how well you handle society.