Parliaments Power example essay topic

Section I, Question 2 In the early 17th century "absolutism" was not only thought of in the theological sense it was also a political catch word all through out Europe. England had a few rulers attempt to create an absolute monarchy. James I and Charles I both tried to have complete rule over the country without consulting Parliament. Parliament, which had a large portion of control, prevented these two rulers from successfully hindering their power. The citizens of England were very use to the combined rule of the king and Parliament.

So they were not very eager or willing to release all the power to a single person. In Parliament an official could be changed if need be, and no one person could in charge of decision making. This is one of the main benefits to having a Parliamentary type of government. Toward the middle of the 17th century troubles between Charles I and Parliament sparked England's civil war. This in turn created problems for future rulers with aspirations about ruling without Parliament. England's civil war was basically the death of royal absolutism; eventually Parliaments power grew to the point that it became the head body of government in England.

Royal absolutism failed horribly in England, this however was not the case in France. France did not have a power similar to Parliament to try and compete against the monarch for control. The citizens of France were also more willing to accept a single head of government. Most felt that having this strong leader would help protect them and keep the peace within their country.

So in conclusion it is clear to see that both systems of government have benefits and drawbacks. Parliament can help a country make better well rounded decisions and also keep a corrupt ruler in check. Absolutism, with the right leader, can help citizens feel more secure give the country a strong image. So in the end it comes down to what the people want and feel comfortable with. Section II, Question 3 The Industrial Revolution in its simplest form was the creation and use of power driven machinery in manufacturing.

It began very subtly. There was a growing demand for agriculture and textiles and the current machinery was unable to keep up. One of the first advances in machinery was the use of water power. Mill owners created machines that could use the power of a flowing stream to enhance the speed of their textile machines. So know that they could weave faster they need to be able to process and harvest more cotton. This urgency helped in the creation of several tools that aided in the cultivation of cotton.

Now they could get the cotton fast and weave it fast, but transporting the cotton from the fields to the mills was tedious. They needed to get the mills closer to the plantations. How could they do this? Turns out that at this same time coal miners were trying to figure out a way to pump the water out of coal mines which lead to the creation of the steam engine. Not only could it help coal miners but it also created a portable source of energy that could help out the textile industry immensely. It is very feasible that the Industrial Revolution could have taken place somewhere else.

England just happened to be in the right place at the right time. European society thrived during the industrial revolution. There was an increase in population and urbanization. One of the biggest changes of the Industrial Revolution was creation of the "working class".

This was a new class of industrial workers that labored for low wages. The Industrial Revolution came to pass by a mere desire for increased production rates, and it blossomed into a economic master piece.