Particular Benefits And Actions Of The Organization example essay topic
On a monthly basis, networks take on urgent action appeal cases that have been researched by Amnesty International. National network is the third form of membership introduced by this association. This branch was founded or developed for people for people that are interested in taking action on a specific country or geographic area as part of a Regional Action Network (Central America or China) and for those wanting to respond to appeals by email (Asia Pacific Rapid Response Network) (Rabb en L., p., 90). The members have thoroughly researched, well coordinated and sustained work on most countries around the world.
National team is the fourth establishment of such kind. Its member activist teams coordinate campaigns in various countries of the world in conjunction with relevant staff. This is a great option for people able to give energy in a sustained way on a specific area. National Teams are spread across numerous regions and have to coordinate their activities using email and the telephone. There are national teams working on specific countries, for example, Myanmar (Burma), and also teams working on specific issues, for example, refugees. There is a broad range of other options which may interest one including involvement in special appeals, special events, pro bono work, office volunteering and also in the policy and decision-making side the individuals organization.
All new contributors are sent an Action Pack, which gives a person a brief introduction on how Amnesty International operates as well as outlining how you can be part of the action. One can contact the local information center in order to find out more relevant information about the topic of human rights and Amnesty International as such. Finally, The basic benefits provided to AI members is the great possibility to feel oneself useful as well as helpful to many individuals in the world who need aid or assistance. More recent work in the field of political structure has developed and tested models of unconventional behavior based on rational choice theory, and here the use of cross-sectional data is more problematic.
Such models, adapted from the framework set forth by Olson in the well-known Logic of Collective Action, posit that individuals calculate the expected costs and benefits associated with various alternatives before deciding whether to participate in or abstain from collective activities (Olson M., p., 67). Numerous studies drawing on the Olson ian Logic have appeared in the literature. Some identify the private payoffs, usually of a social or psychological nature, that allegedly motivate unconventional action. Others show that individual preferences for public goods, coupled with estimates of the likelihood of group success in providing the goods through collective behavior and perceptions of the importance of personal participation, are the critical explanatory variables.
Moreover, individuals who have participated in protest may change their attitudes as a result of their past participation, either by absorbing new information about a given situation and their own capabilities or by rationalizing to themselves or the survey interviewer that their actions must have been changed due to their high levels of alienation, their strong belief that the protest group could be successful, and the like. Amnesty International official report in 1991 concluded that one solution to this problem is to alter the dependent variable to represent the individuals future willingness or intention to participate in protest activities. Much research in the field does make use of behavioral intentions as the dependent variable, sometimes weighting these intentions with reports of past behavior in order to make the intentions variable more realistic. Although these models help overcome the temporal ordering problem, they are unsatisfactory to the extent that, as is often the case, the relationship between behavioral intentions and actual behavior is weak. Neo-Pluralists argue that it is important to overcome the barriers to collective action in the early stage of the organizations history. In other words, people are to become aware of the institutional goals and aims from the very beginning in order to contribute to the successful growth and development of the entity later (Lich bach, R., p., 89).
Amnesty International applied the mentioned above logic introduced by Neo-Pluralists because such approach presented the only reasonable path for the normal and quick expansion of the association as the socially responsible unit. To continue, AI directors inform its members about the particular improvements and achievements of the organization in order to ensure the group practical viability as well as desire to continue working in the set direction. Such means of influence enable members to see the real results of their work, thus contributing to their level of consciousness and self worth (Olson M., p., 90). Using the Neo-Pluralist Argument, it is clear that people who are part of AI receive the psychological benefits form the membership in this organization. Although there are some expressive aspects presented in the general perception of belonging to AI advantage, people feel great psychological satisfaction as well as personal approval of their thoughts and actions. To continue, it is obvious that AI concentrates on providing its members with a particular mood or emotion of belonging to a well-known group that concentrates on making the world a better place.
Such humane ideas present the greatest appeal to everybody who is willing to join the organization as well as work for the sake of participating in various non-profit projects. To continue, Neo-Pluralist approach helps one to derive the proper understanding of the benefits that can be potentially derived from joining the organization. One needs to carefully consider the cost that will be encountered in the case of becoming a member of the group. The issues that belong to this notion are the personal time, expenses, and an opportunity to do something else. An individual who wants to join the AI must carefully consider all alternatives and options that are available on hand.