Philosophy Of Mohandas Gandhi example essay topic

Civil disobedience and passive resistance was morally superior to all other types of resistance to unjust laws. The philosophy of Mohandas Gandhi did not incite violence and was the safest and best way to resolve and abolish unjust laws. An example of this can be found in the incident at the Dharassana Salt Works, a British factory. The aspects of his philosophy were all peaceful and did not incite violence.

The aspects were civil disobedience, live simply and serve others. The most important of the aspects is civil disobedience. One would think that this is a way to incite violence, but the fact is that civil disobedience means to break an unjust law, and then serve the consequence to show respect for the need of law and rules. Civil disobedience does not incite violence. Indians asked for two things basically, freedom and their basic rights. Gandhi was one of the main influences in Indias independence.

The only other way to try to change unjust laws and get independence is to fight wars. Gandhi never thought about that. Mohandas Gandhi did not celebrate Indias victory for independence because he was disappointed that there was so much violence and fighting between the Indians and British. Violence was something that Gandhi never wanted nor incited. Civil disobedience proved not to incite violence which was the morally right thing to do. The Salt March and the Dharassana Salt Works incident were two of the most important civil disobedience acts.

For a long time, Britain had a monopoly of salt in India. Indians producing salt was strictly outlawed. Gandhi and a large group of people marched from his house all the way to the ocean and made salt. Even though it was outlawed he and his men did not struggle when being arrested. Eventually when all the jails were ful of men, the British started beating Indians on the head with sticks, literally. This was a huge victory for Gandhi because the press followed every move he made and attention was being spread around the world which is what Gandhi wanted because the other parts of the world could see how immoral the British were.

That was exactly what Gandhi wanted to do. He did not incite violence, but even if violence did not occur, he would still get his point out by breaking the law and making salt and getting arrested without resisting. The press and media were everywhere Gandhi was which was just what he wanted. With the media covering what was going on, other leaders around the world could see what awful things the British were doing to the Indians. The most important event that Gandhi led was the Dharassana Salt Works incident. The Indians wanted to take over the factory to continue making their own salt.

When Gandhi was in jail, a Muslim leader asked the British guards if they could enter and when the soldiers said no, the people lined up in rows of five and walked up to the gate. Instead of arresting them which was moral thing to do, the British soldiers beat them with sticks. This went on for hours and the press were there to tell all about it. They said, what ever little morality the British had is now lost. 1 That quote was just what Gandhi needed to show the rest of the world how the Indians were treated. He did not incite violence.

The soldiers at the gate could have just arrested them instead of beating them mercilessly. This proves that civil disobedience was the morally best thing to do and Gandhi did not incite violence. To conclude, Mohandas Gandhi philosophy was morally the best thing to do to fight for Indias independence because it did not incite violence. The Salt incidents and his philosophy proved that civil disobedience did not incite violence. Passive resistance was the morally right thing to do than all other types of resistance to unjust laws..