Physical Action Of The Braievokes Awareness example essay topic
If it is eve achieved, everyday activities such as vacuuming, or laundry would become automated. The leader in the field of AI i actually not a business, but MIT's Artificial IntelligencLaboratory. It does more ground breaking research in the al fields of AI, including robotics and neural networks, than another facility in the world. First I will describe the differen techniques and fields that fall under AI. The first techniquthat is used to create intelligent systems is the top-dow approach.
That is when the computer is given a written set o directions such as "IF that is red, THEN go forward' and it wil go from there according to the program. This technique wa widely used back in the 1950's when AI was still a mysteriousubject, but it has major flaws. To write complex program that take in all their surroundings would take hundreds o thousands of lines of code, which no one has the time t write. The newest technique that is being used is bottom-up That is the arrangement of data into a complex system wher all information is connected, like a brain, which is why it also referred to as a neural network. It is extremely comple and confusing at some points, so I won't describe it here, bu you don't need to understand it to answer the question ah and. There are also many different fields of study that fal under AI.
The first field that I'll talk about is robotics. This fiel has been prospering in the '90's. It is not so much th engineering for the robots that is causing the standstill i functionality of these machines, but the computers that contro what they do, which is the problem with all forms of AI righ now. There is also database processing, which works with th way that a computer sorts and retrieves information. An intelligent software agents that can tell you when to buy ansell stock among many other things. But, what this speecmainly focuses on is the theory behind all this, which has i town field.
There are four categories of viewpoints that on may have on this topic. "A. All thinking is computation; i particular, feelings of conscious awareness are evoke merely by the carrying out of appropriate computations. Awareness is a feature of the brain's physical action; an whereas any physical action can be simulate computationally, computational simulation cannot by itselevoke awareness. C. Appropriate physical action of the braievokes awareness, but that physical action cannot even b properly simulated computationally. D. Awareness cannot b explained by physical, computational, or any other scientifiterms. ' Penrose 12 All that says is that it all depends if thbrain functions computationally or physically (chemicareactions) and whether or not you believe that either of thos can be simulated by a machine or biological creation of som kind. We will be dealing with viewpoint A and D. If you believing viewpoint A than you believe that computers can become " aware' of their surroundings. The word "aware' means that ican take in its whole surroundings and make judgments an actions for itself, which a giant leap from where AI is at now. I really depends on how you view how the brain functions Research is being done by neuro biologists to unlock thsecret of how the brain works.
It could function b computation or chemical reactions, no one is really sure. You think that it is all done computationally, and that human can simulate it in a machine of some sort than you believe iA. "A is an implication of a highly operational attitude t science, where, also, the physical world is taken to operat entirely computational. ' Penrose 13.
There has been n evidence that supports or denies this viewpoint because thsecret of how the brain works has not been solved, yet. Th viewpoint D, on the other hand totally rejects the whole ide that computers, or any machine can achieve any form intelligence that may be mistaken for human action. The mai reason for believers in this category is from the work o German mathematician named Kurt Go edel. He was a goo friend of Albert Einstein and helped him with his theory o relativity. He was more into the question of logic. His "LogiTheorem' is highly complex and impossible to explain in thi speech.
It pretty much says that logic is only a biologicaprocess and cannot be simulated using any form of device o algorithms. Some how he proved this using mathematics. Hi work is highly debatable and still only a theory and that is wh the viewpoint A is still a possibility. We will not get into than C viewpoints because they are extremely hazy, and no very precise. They pretty much say that you believe that thbrain functions computationally and physically, but cannot simulated by any machine. Whereas in D you believe the keto creating "awareness' in a machine will never be reached.
I myself, believe that A, can and will be achieved. The boom o technological advances in both the area of AI an Neurobiology force me to believe in that viewpoint. M prediction is that it will be achieved by the year 2050. I'm no sure yet if it is going to be a good thing. Many jobs will be los due to automation. Hundreds of thousands of people wil replaced with machines that perform flawless and error free And it would be cheaper to buy a machine for $5,000 that ca work for 10 years, than to pay someone $40,000 a year for 1 years, that is just simple math.
AI is a very interesting field thais still in the early stages. There have only been majoadvances in that field in the last 10 years and I believe that iwill keep on going like that. Hopefully, when I am old and can " function for myself I will have a computer that can do it all some.