Planning Process In A Major Way example essay topic

682 words
Fillion, P. (2002) Postmodern Planning. pg. 265-285 Quote: "Planning discourse is becoming increasingly disconnected from implementation". This quote is from the first paragraph of the article by Pierre Fillion. As a matter of fact, it is the first sentence he uses. It is a very strong sentence that sets up his article beautifully. While after reading his article, I do not agree with all of his statements or points, but this one, his main one, I do agree with strongly. Pierre lays out why he believes that planning discourse is becoming increasingly disconnected from implementation.

He states that the public is becoming more involved in the planning aspect, many different ways, including advocacy groups, community based groups, and public general meetings. He also states that it is becoming harder to implement the plans that they do come up with. I believe that this is happening for a multitude of reasons. First and foremost, the main reason that the implementation aspect is lacking is because almost all areas of the western world have become obsessed with financial stability as well as have become quite fiscally conscious. Therefore getting the financing for these plans has become increasingly difficult over the past so many years. Cities, individuals, businesses, provinces, states and governments cannot freely spend on items just because someone or a group wants something planned.

People are becoming more conservative, and therefore less is being accomplished now, than once was. Another reason, that I believe that things are not always accomplished is because of the planning that goes into them. I feel that people have become more conscientious of the advocacy groups and public groups that want things planning and accomplished a certain way. With the rise in public input, it is possible that the planned projects lose some credibility, and therefore when it gets to the implementation stage, those involved are less open to proceeding with the project. These two things, the publics' opinion and the financial timidness, have led to a gap to be created between the two, and with each passing year, that gap seems to be widening. Qadeer, M.A. (1997) Pluralistic planning for multicultural cities.

Pg. 481-494 Quote: "The cultural and racial diversity of citizens bears on the planning process in three ways". Following this quote the article goes on to explain in three ways how these three things affect the planning process. Without reading those three paragraphs, I am going to give my opinion on how I believe that in three ways the topic affects the planning process. And then I am going to see how my opinions are similar or different that the articles. First I believe that culture and race affect the planning process in a major way because, today, we in Canada live in a very accepting society.

We are very PC (politically correct) in the way we do everything. Therefore, decisions that are made, are not always the best ones, but are the ones that do not step on as many people's toes. It may not be the best choice financially or logically, but if it offends the least amount of people, then it wins. I do not mean this in a bad way though, as Canadians we just try and do the best for all culture and races, no matter what. Secondly, cities can use the diversity of their cities to their advantage. Take Toronto for example, they use the fact that they are a multicultural city and work with that.

It is a clear fact that Toronto is culturally and racially diverse. It is for this reason that they plan for this. My third point, actually has become my tie in with what is in the reading. In a way, Mr. Qadeer covers both of my points in the article. The only one I did not much on was his third point about the expanse in the scope and procedure.