Plato Vs Aristotle Plato And Aristotle example essay topic
Aristotle preached balance. In balance, a stable government can be observed and obtained. Plato's concept of what politics and government should be is a direct result of his belief in the theory of forms. The theory of forms basically states that there is a higher 'form' for everything that exists in the world. Each material thing is a representation of the real thing which is the form.
According to Plato, most people cannot see the forms; they only see their representation or their shadows. Love for Plato had to be accomplished through mind and soul. For him, and his idea the mind and soul could not be separated, either through mortality or immortality. Someone could not love without body or a soul. To Aristotle we are of substance. One cannot see a soul, nor detect a mind, or where it lies, therefore to Aristotle, it does not exist.
One cannot see love, it does not have fire, flesh or a head... all aspects of matter that are defined of what everything living is. In conclusion, my idea of what the ideal politics is, which I know cannot be obtained is where the people are respected. No irresponsibility of what the people want carried through, to get dropped, or forgotten or even just not even considered. We live in a society where we have lost touch with what matters, what the democracy is set for, what it stands for as Americans. My view on love is that it exists. In small forms, and in peoples perceptions those feelings, yes, can be found, and made.
Although it is a changing feeling, not a truth, therefore in some aspects nonexistent, but what if there were exceptions to reality, in human emotions and chemical imbalances that there are some ways of unexplainable connections and perceptions identified by the human mind. Creation in the eyes of a Presbyterian raised girl is that God does have a high power, and uses it. He created the Earth, the sky, everything. The creator is a God, who created man, and woman.