Play About Hamlet example essay topic

2,045 words
Hamlet What is a tragedy? A tragedy can be defined as a form of drama that depicts the suffering of a heroic individual who is often overcome by the very obstacles he is struggling to remove (Tragedy 1). Shakespeare's play, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, is considered a tragedy in literature and the character of Hamlet in the play is considered to be a tragic hero. In addition, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark is considered to be a type of tragedy called revenge tragedy. Basically, this type of play consists of a murder that has to be avenged by a relative of the victim (DiYanni 1394). Ultimately, the play is about a son that is called upon by the ghost of his father to avenge his death.

On the surface, the play about Hamlet may appear to be a typical revenge tragedy. However, crime, madness, ghostly anguish, poison, overheard conversations, conspiracies, and a final scene littered with corpses: Hamlet subscribes to the basic ingredients of the formula, but it also transcends the conventions of revenge tragedy because Hamlet contemplates not merely revenge but suicide and the meaning of life itself (DiYanni 1394). There are three crucial points in the plot in which Hamlet expresses his particular thoughts and positions. In each of these scenes, Hamlet displays his character in and through the manner in which he chooses to act in the situations in which he finds himself, and provides information about his stance on life as a whole. In addition, in each of the scenes there are reoccurring themes of revenge and appearance versus reality. As mentioned before, the major theme of the novel is revenge and this can be seen because Hamlet must avenge his father's murder by killing Claudius.

The second major theme of the play is the theme of appearance versus reality. The play makes several references to how things appear versus the truth (Hamlet 6). For example, King Hamlet's death appears to be a snakebite in the beginning of the play, but it turns out to be a calculated murder (Hamlet 6). The first crucial point in the plot where Hamlet's thought and character are displayed takes place during the first scene during Act, Scene 1. In this act, some of the most famous and most important lines in the play are spoken. In Hamlet's soliloquy during Act, Scene 1, Hamlet asks a question concerning the nature of being.

When Hamlet says, "To be, or not to be: that is the question" he is questioning whether it is better for him to live or die (1438). It becomes even more apparent that Hamlet is contemplating suicide during his soliloquy when he says, "Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them" (1438-1439). When Hamlet speaks these lines the thoughts and positions held by Hamlet at this point in the play become very apparent. At this point in the play, Hamlet is wondering whether it would not be better to end his life than to face the trials and tribulations ahead (Hamlet 19). Hamlet is perplexed between life and death at this point because Hamlet knows that he must seek revenge, yet he is still uncertain of murdering Claudius.

Hamlet contemplates suicide because he is miserable over heisting the murder of Claudius. In this scene, the two main themes of the story become apparent. In his heart, Hamlet wants to seek revenge on Claudius, but on the outside, Hamlet wants to make sure that he is not being misled or tricked into thinking that Claudius is his father's murderer. Hamlet believes his own hesitation comes from a fear of the consequences; yet he is miserable and filled with guilt and shame over his failure to act in killing either Claudius or himself (Hamlet 20). Also, it is apparent that Hamlet is debating over whether to seek revenge or not when he says, "Thus conscience does make cowards of us all" (1439). When Hamlet speaks this line, he is providing insight into his character.

As much as Hamlet wants to avenge the death of his father, his conscience still has a strong hold on him, and his conscience is preventing him from seeking revenge. This statement also shows that the task of revenge is something that is foreign to Hamlet's nature (Hamlet 36). Furthermore, he finds that he has been thrown into an emotional situation that demands a decision against which his morals revolt and he believes in forgiveness rather than in revenge (Hamlet 36). Therefore, from this soliloquy the thoughts and positions held by Hamlet at this point in the play are apparent. The second scene that provides insight into the thought and character of Hamlet takes place during Act V, Scene 1. This scene, also called the graveyard scene, takes place after the death of Ophelia.

During this scene, Hamlet again questions mortality. Hamlet contemplates the mortality of man as he watches the human skulls being tossed from their sleepy graves by the gravediggers (Hamlet 33). In addition, it is during this scene that Hamlet has made a breakthrough in understanding his question of "To be or not to be". However, it is not the death of Ophelia that helps Hamlet make this breakthrough. Surprisingly, the skull of Yorick, the king's old jester, helps Hamlet to make his breakthrough. When Hamlet sees the skull of Yorick, he takes the skull into his hands and says, "Alas, poor Yorick!

I knew him, Horatio: a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy: he hath borne me on his back a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is" (1483). Once Hamlet comes into contact with the skull of Yorick, Hamlet becomes a new man. First of all, we see that Hamlet now understands and accepts the conditions of being a human (World 1). Secondly, the theme of appearance versus reality can be seen during this scene. When Hamlet admires the skull, he realizes that in the end all of mankind ends up the same way. This realization on Hamlet's part shows that Hamlet understands that there are no false appearances after death.

Most importantly, after the graveyard scene and what it indicates, we know that Hamlet is ready for the final contest of mighty opposites (World 1). Finally by the third scene, Hamlet answers his question about how one should be. In this last scene, Hamlet's character and thoughts have made a complete 360 from the first scene. There are many reasons for this change in character. The first evidence of this change in character can be seen when Hamlet tells Horatio how he sent Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to their deaths. The very act of plotting the deaths of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern show that Hamlet has been transformed.

When Horatio questions if Guildenstern and Rosencrantz were really sent to their deaths by Hamlet, Hamlet responds by saying, "Why, man, they did make love to this employment; they are not near my conscience; their defeat does by their own insinuation grow: 'tis dangerous when the baser nature comes between the pass and fell incensed points of might opposites" (1488). This statement in itself is one excellent example of Hamlet's change. In the first scenes of the play, Hamlet was always blaming himself and contemplating suicide. In addition, at the beginning of the play Hamlet was the type of man that had a difficult time seeking revenge. However, when Hamlet plots the deaths of Guildenstern and Rosencrantz, he actively participates in cold blooded murder, and he takes responsibility for the revenge that he set out to seek.

Another aspect of Hamlet's character that has transformed by the third scene is new found understanding of providence. In the earlier scenes of the play, Hamlet maneuvered around the world of "seems" and "acts" and "plays" as long as he could, and tried to beat this world by using its own tactics (Gulvin 22). He feigned madness and betrayed the woman he ostensibly loves, her father, and his school chums (Gulvin 22). However, by the end of the play, Hamlet finally realizes that his fate is inevitable. On the same note, Hamlet has finally "learned, and accepted, the boundaries in which human action, human judgment, are enclosed (Gulvin 22). This new understanding of fate reshapes Hamlet's understanding of the relationship between conscience and failure to act.

One of the main reasons why Hamlet did not seek revenge earlier in the play was because he was listening to his conscience. By the finally scene however, Hamlet realizes that even though he may feel a particular way inside, that providence still has a predetermined life for him. Therefore, with this new knowledge, Hamlet realizes that he must take action and follow the read that he is suppose to in life. Likewise, Hamlet's new found motivation is a major reason why he willingly enters Claudius's trap at the end of the play. This willingness is a sign of courage and resignation.

When Hamlet aggress to take part in the dual, Horatio warns Hamlet to make sure that he is thinking through the situation properly, Hamlet once again responds to Horatio with a new attitude and a new understanding of providence when he says, "Not a whit, we defy augury: there's a special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, 'tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come: the readiness is all: since no man of aught he leaves knows, what is't to leave betimes? Let be" (1491). This statement strongly supports Hamlet's new belief in fate, and it shows how Hamlet now feels that it is never too soon to take action. This statement also shows that Hamlet is now aware of his journey in life, and how he realizes that it is time to complete that journey. Also, Hamlet's willingness to enter Claudius's trap is courage and resignation because Hamlet is fully aware when he enters the dual that he will die.

Once Hamlet has been wounded and is aware that he has been stabbed by a poison sword, he realizes that it is finally time to make up for lost time. At this point in the play, Hamlet takes life into his own hands and follows his destiny by finally murdering Claudius. All in all, even though Hamlet, Prince of Denmark is considered a tragic play, it is not completely tragic. There a re numerous reasons for this. First of all, Hamlet's goal was to avenge his father's murder, and by the end of the story Hamlet succeeds in his task. In addition, even though Hamlet himself is too killed at the end of the play, it is not completely tragic because he has become aware of fate.

If Hamlet had died not committing his goal in life, and not learning anything of providence, the play would be a complete tragedy. However, this is not the case, and the play is not as tragic as it could be. Lastly, by observing Hamlet's character and thoughts throughout these three specific points in the play, the themes of revenge and appearance versus reality can clearly be seen. At the beginning of the play, Hamlet is unsure if he should seek revenge because he is not able to differentiate between appearance and reality. However, by the end of the play, Hamlet has realized that it is his fate to kill Claudius and seek revenge for the murder of his father. Also, Hamlet has found a deeper understanding of providence and realizes that the reality of his life is to avenge the death of his father.

Bibliography

DiYanni, Robert, Literature: Reading Fiction, Poetry and Drama. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
Hamlet. 2001-2002.
Book wolf. 14 Dec. 2004.
Hamlet. 1997.
Pink Monkey. com. 14 Dec. 2004.
The World of Hamlet. 5 Mar. 1992.
Dr, Gerald Lucas. 14 Dec, 2004 web All Refer.
com. 14 Dec, 2004 web.