Practice Of Female Genital Mutilation example essay topic
The practice of female genital mutilation has been going on for centuries. For people to understand the tradition of this practice without living through with in that culture is very hard. The tribal way of thinking may seem primitive, but it is a tradition that is seen as religious and ceremonial. The practice to them is normal and brings intrinsic value to them. The story shows a very horrible side o this practice. An opposing story could have been about a wife enjoying her life because of her traditional practice.
There is an argument to the attack of ethical relativism. These tribes are usually male run tribes. The procedure is done for male gratification. Knowing that his wife will be a virgin, and will stay faithful, because sex will not be pleasurable. Could it also be an egocentric religion that says women are loose and unclean if female genital mutilation is not performed? By a religion saying this, it is sure that if you do not perform this practice you will be an outcast.
Therefore you are put in a place as a lady in this society to have no choice but to perform these acts of female genital mutilation. Over periods of time, the women in the region are excepting with this tradition because it is all they know. Giving a choice and correctly educating them on the pros and cons, they may choose not to perform this surgery. The theme of female genital mutilation, ethical relativism is a problematic moral theory. I believe there are so many negative components of female genital mutilation that are negative, that this practice should not be performed.
I firmly do not believe these girls are giving an option to do this procedure, but are obligated under their ethical code to perform these rituals. Some of the negative components of genital mutilation are, Health problems, unnecessary pain and suffering, and it are an unhygienic procedure. I also understand traditions are very hard to stop. We can understand why Tashi went back to perform this operation. She felt obligated by tradition to have this performed.
She believed it was a sentimental gesture to her people to do this. This is a realistic idea; it is very conclusive that she wanted to feel close to the people she grew up with by doing this. To gain their respect and to feel as though she is still part of there culture. In my opinion, I believe Alice Walker is doing the correct thing by exposing the practice of genital mutilation.
I believe it to e very barbaric and grotesque. There are tons of rituals and practices I believe are truly ethically relative and great. This is not one of them. I do not believe these girls are giving a choice to have this procedure.
They are at an age were they can weigh out pros and cons of a decision. But they are giving no decision. The fact of the matter is they are not giving a choice at all. They feel just as obligated to there society as Tashi did.
I would believe this to be a great procedure, if it caused no pain, or health problems, no child barring problems as well as no sexual loss for the ladies. I believe as creatures of the human race, we are born with certain parts that shall not be altered. I am not talking about a tumor or a cancer, but a body part every woman is born with. The sexual functions of the clitoris and vigina are tens of thousands of years of evolution.
To me no cultural relativism can change that. I believe female genital mutilation is wrong. The issue of female genital mutilation is very controversial. Being in the society (tribe) that adopts the idea of female genital mutilation, it may seem normal. I believe though the man leaders made it up centuries ago. I believe there is just one reason for doing this.
It is for the sexual gratification of the men in these tribes. For this tradition to change I bet no man in that area is going to complain about female genital mutilation, but it is the women who have to take charge. M'lissa is an evil figure in this story. She does not inform any of her patients about the pleasure or pains of the procedure. She just does as they ask, and perform the procedure. Tashi says to M'lissa, "It is what you told me.
Remember? The uncircumcised women is loose, you said, like a shoe that all, no matter what their size might wear. This is unseemly, you said. Unclean. A proper women must be cut and sewn to fit only her husband, whose pleasure depends on an opening it might take months, even years to enlarge.
Men love and enjoy the struggle you said. For the women... But you never said anything about the women did you, M'lissa? About the pleasure she might have. Or the suffering". (Walker, 150) Tashi was correct in blaming M'lissa for what happened.
It was M'lissas fault. Not only was it her fault, but also the male dominated society in which brought about the idea of female genital mutilation. M'lissa felt it was an obligation to her society by being the medicine women to do this. I do not believe Tashi should have murdered her for this. But she could of tried to change the ways of her old tried. Ethical Relativism is terrific.
I am for it Eighty Five percent. The Fifteen percent I am against it is for issues like female genital mutilation. I believe if the ethical relativism of the issue harms, risks, or gives no way out for the persons doing the issue, then it is wrong. If does no harm to the individuals or others then Ethical relativism is ok. In this particular case I do not agree with female genital mutilation.
I believe it is morally awful. With the pain and health problems that are directly inflicted by the practice, there is a reason why I believe it is unethical to practice female genital mutilation.