Proofs Of Gods Existence example essay topic

St. Thomas Aquinas: Proofs of Gods existence. Aquinas says that Gods essence (feeling) is his existence. That there is no Actual need for proof of his existence. Before he actually developed his Proofs Aquinas tried to show that such proofs are not useless, since the Idea of Gods existence is not, a probable idea-that God exists. Because Of this fact he states that every man has a natural knowledge (that which he is born with.) of God such as: he has some ideas of happiness (since he wants / desires it.) but he might think that happiness is made up of sexual pleasure or in the possession of wealth. Aquinas is trying to prove that the true happiness can only be found in God (because he truly believed in Gods existence due to the society he was in.

). He states that a man who truly believes that there is no truth asserts that it is true that there is no truth, but this does not matter if the man knows primal truth- a source of God. This is St. Thomas argument for the need of not proof, Aquinas says that in general we must make a distinction between real and fake. Not every one understands by God. This is an argument by proof. He stated that Gods existence cannot be proven but the idea and essence of God can be.

Aquinas also says that there is no logical need of his proof. The fourth proof is from Aristotles observations in metaphysics. It starts from ideas of perfection, of goodness, truth and etc. This deals with the comparative or example: this is better than and why. He also states that God is recognized by all that believe in him. All of these things started from degrees of perfection, of goodness.

He stated that although there was a unity there was a very large Difference. between the two. That only God holds the power o acting in itself. Aquinas was asked a question: How can a human being understand Gods essence so he can work to attain it The answer was that only faith could lead humanity to an understanding of God and the essence (of mankind. ). The Existence of God and the limits of explanation. It seems to me (in this day and age) that God does not exist.

The meaning of this word is something good without any limitations. So this makes one question if God were to have existed there would be no evil in this world encountered. But evil is encountered, so, therefor, God does not exist. St Thomas Aquinas would defiantly not have agreed with my views.

He would probably have told me that there is no need for the explanation for Gods existence. Aquinas says that everything in the world that can be observed can be accounted for by other principals, on the belief that there is no such thing as God. Therefore natural events / effects are explained by natural causes, while other effects are referred to human reason and will. Therefore there is no need to argue the existence of God. Aquinas says that the existence of God is self evident and that self- evident is used in two senses; in one it is self-evident in itself, but not to us; the other is self-evident and to us. He says that a proposition is self evident when the predicate is part of the subject: For example man is an animal since animal is part if the meaning man.

If everyone knows the essence of the subject and the predicate the proposition will be self-evident to everyone just like God. So, Aquinas says that the proposition God exists to all is self evident in since the subject and the predicate are the same. He stated that God is his own existence. God meaning something that which a greater cannot be conceived, because some people have thought of God to be body.

No one can make the argument that God exists in reality since they cannot touch or feel him. First mover - The ways in the Summa Theological (Arguments trying to prove Gods existence.) Aquinas says that it is possible to prove that God exists. The first way comes from motion. Because we are sure that somethings in this world move.

Everything in this world which moves is moved by something elseS o if that by which it is moved is itself being moved by something else also; and something else again. But this process has to stop somewhere, it is not possible for it to go on forever; because, if it did there would be no first mover; and no other mover. Secondary movers do not move unless they are moved by a first mover; For example the stick does not move unless it is moved by hand. Therefore, it is necessary to find some first mover which is moved by nothing else and this all men understand to be God. Aquinas is trying to say that there cannot be a process that goes on into infinity.

Cosmological Arguments. The first type of cosmological arguments comes from the idea that there are things which we cannot see. This concludes that all things must be done through the work of God. Aquinas automatically assumes that the existence of the universe cannot be without Gods existence. CONCLUSION Through all of these arguments St. Thomas Aquinas was trying to prove the existence of God. He was a very religious man who followed Aristotles ways.

Aquinas believed that there was no reason to question Gods existence because it was obvious. Through men of his arguments he did prove this. Aquinas was a modernist and was A very important figure in Catholic Orthodoxy