Races And Genders example essay topic

When average Americans apply for jobs, they hope that the companies acknowledge Equal Opportunity. They know that the color of skin, gender, or even physical disabilities do not hinder the person's capabilities to grasp the job; he or she earns it through skills and qualifications pertaining to that career. How can America justifiably discriminate by allowing Equal Opportunity to some but not for all? Therefore, the president of the United States must not be selected based on gender or the color of the skin, but elected by the content of character and political views. Throughout history, America has cultivated a diverse group of presidents. True, all were Caucasian men, but their backgrounds, personalities, and values cover the vast fields of difference, from quiet Jefferson to idealistic Wilson to the scandalous and drunk Grant.

Also, most people can name terrible leaders (i.e. Pierce, Hoover, or Nixon) and great (Lincoln and Washington). What made them terrible or great? Race or gender obviously played no part; politics separated these people. Charisma and liberalism probably come to mind when one hears Barack Obama's name.

He speaks beautifully, supports minimum wage increase, and believes in universal health care. However, some people think America takes a mighty step forward with him because he is African American. Since race should play no part, it stands important that America has already seen Obama-twice in a century. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy also spoke eloquently and possessed far left ideas for transforming the nation: the New Deal and the New Frontier. All three work (ed) for the people, supporting them, helping them achieve the American dream of freedom and equality for all. Some people also believe Hillary Clinton's chance of being president marches women's rights a mile forward, but she cannot be elected merely because of gender.

She, too, deserves the equal opportunity others receive. The executive branch also once hosted Clinton's ideals-not with the obvious Bill Clinton-but with Harry Truman. Both spent time in the Senate on countless committees, remain (ed) nonpartisan, and advocate (d) Social Security. Both also originally supported a war (Iraq and World War Two) only to eventually decide those wars worked horribly, as complicated travesties. The point stands-we have seen her before. We have indeed seen both Obama and Clinton before.

Yes, in the Senate, but also their ideals once belonged to a past president who, for better or worse, forever changed this nation. That's the key. America cannot blindly throw at a dartboard of diversity expecting to elect a great leader, a representative of this land and its many people. Basing presidential selections on race or gender do not elect presidents-they elect races and genders. Appearance is just not important; it remains only skin deep. Importance lies in what occurs in the Oval Office, at a time when the country's debt staggers at incomprehensible numbers, twelve million Americans suffer through life jobless, and military presence in foreign nations triggers global implications; how someone looks just does not seem to matter..