Robotic Evolution example essay topic

From this question Mills gives an ultimatum that asks someone to pick between two pleasures. There are the higher pleasures of being satisfied, as a beast, or the lower pleasures of being dissatisfied, as a human. There are several factors that come into view, if you choose one of these paths. But we as humans know what it is like to be human, but we will never know what it is like to be an animal. We can only assume. Animals are content with their life-as far as we know.

They do not have to think about bills, traffic, relationships, war, or school. Animals do not act concerned about what they are going to wear or how much money they have. The mentality of an animal is to survive and to reproduce. They know to reproduce offspring when the time comes every year or whenever their cycle is. The only thing on their mind is constant survival.

Animals are relentlessly looking for food and shelter. Animals enjoy pleasures like humans do-we know that from having pets. They love attention and we can see that by the emotion put out. The human experience is far more gratifying than being an animal. Being a dissatisfied person would certainly suit me.

Not that I would really know what a satisfied beast would feel like, but I know that being human has many benefits. I can experience the joy of children and family; I can experience many levels of happiness; I can experience satisfaction from listening to music or reading a book. Even if I was a sad, miserable person, I could still dream about being famous or dream about having a huge house and family. Animals as satisfied as they are, do not contemplate about such things. Being able to do things like the examples above makes life great for me. The world is a cruel place.

Go up on Commercial Street on the North side of Springfield. You will see plenty of homeless people. They probably do not get a lot of food or have great pleasures as most other people, but they live to the next day. This winter when most people are in their homes with the heat turned up to 75 degrees, a homeless person freezes outside and will wake up most likely the next day same as us.

They still experience the same essential needs and emotions. If an uneducated transient were offered a chance to go to the movies, he or she probably would go. I'm sure they would understand the plot of the movie too. Where as, even the smartest of animals would not. Being human is a great gift. Most people take it for granted.

Take sight for example. Being able to see color is so precious. Reds, blues, purples, hues, shades and tints are precious in their own way. Animals do not sit there and think to themselves, "Wow, I'm so thankful I can see my legs, color, movement, or the sky". Guess what, most humans do not either. They are too busy thinking about material things or work.

They are like little ants going from one place to the next, not caring about anything, but the task ahead. I take pleasure in looking at 3 D objects and colors. I take pleasure in being able to think on higher levels and picking apart certain situations in my life. A point I would like to make is that no one will ever be satisfied with his or her current position in life. Life is constantly throwing new ideas, feelings, and desires at us. After you " ve achieved one desire, a new desire will come to surface.

We will never be satisfied because that will stop the cycle that we live in. We can be happy with what we have, but we will never be satisfied with the current position we are in. Question 6: Robots evolving with the ethics of caring. This question brings up a lot of interesting points about life and the creation of life. We can create life in animals, cloning, and plant life. There is a certain driving force that makes all of those examples alive.

We have the power to create artificial intelligence, but will it ever be "alive" and full of feeling. So alive and full of feeling that it will surpass us as a species? First off, I would like to say that I do not think that the humans have stopped evolving. Technology is a creation of the human species. Any robotic evolution would be a human evolution also. We as people will continue to evolve as we always have since the beginning.

We will grow taller (look at the height our species started out and look at our height now) and continue to gain more intelligence about reality and the world. I do think that it will be possible for robots to care. In thinking this you have to look at a few points. Will robots all have the same ethics when if comes to caring?

How and who will decide what is the right ethics of caring? These are important questions because they will affect the ultimate outcome of the evolution process of the robots. Ethics are very important when you think about it. If I'm taking a semester long class on ethics, it must be of some importance.

So far in class I've seen that not everyone has the same views or ethics as the next person. When we start programming caring into the robots, are all the robots going to care the same way? Are we going to have to have a code of ethics that all robots follow? If we program them to feel that homosexuality, discrimination, abortion, and suicide is wrong, who's to say that is the way they should feel.

These issues have a great deal involving the characteristic of "caring". Most people, when asked about these subjects, project sense of care. When robots are equipped with the function to care, circumstances will arise that will test them. Environment can effect how a person cares. For example, person (a) could care strongly about person (b) today. Later on in the day, person (b) hurts person (a) and their feelings for person (b) leave.

Now will a robot react the same way? If another person or robot affects them in a certain way, will the outcome affect the way they care? So in conclusion I do think that robots will be functioning in the future. They may be able to care, but they will have to learn to care. It's not something you can program into them. They will have to have consciousness and be able to tell right from wrong.

This will take a very long time. During this period of time, I do not think the robots will surpass us in evolution. Why would is stop now? Why not 30 years ago. We will continue to adapt and make advancements in life.