Same Sex Marriages 3 4 example essay topic

For thousands of years, most cultures around the world have recognized marriage as a union between men and women. In the majority of modern nations, including the United States, same-sex couples cannot be legally married. Several gay couples unsuccessfully filed lawsuits in the latter half of the twentieth century against various states for not allowing them to marry. However, same-sex marriage were never considered possible in the United States until three same-sex couples challenged Hawaii's marriage law on the grounds that it discriminated against them based on their sex. Should gay people be allowed to marry? American is known as a sign of freedom all over the world.

That is because the basis of American ideal of human rights is the concept of not denying people their rights unless you can show a compelling reason. According to the U.S. federal law, "Marriage is an institution between one man and one woman". Is this just like a kind of discrimination? Marriage depends on one's gender. Who can define the marriage? The married?

The marriageable? Is this just like a kind of allowing a banker to decide who can own the money, which stored in his bank? They have their right to get marry with someone they love. Everyone has his right. Even the murderer after a long time in jail can get marry. Did gay people do something worse than a murderer?

In our society, if we did something not on purpose, or out of our control, we are innocent. Just like, if the person was certified having mental problem. He can attempt treatment instead of getting into the jail; even he has committed a serious crime. These days, there is quite a bit of scientific research the attempt to answer the question why some people are gay or lesbian and others are not. According to Anne Perkins's study of "gay" sheep and George and Molly Hunt's study of "lesbian" seagulls 3/4 have shown that some animals do form homosexual pair bonds. If their unusual deed was just because of their genes, that means they can not control to love a same-sex person.

Should we discriminate or blame on them, on their genes? Marriage and children are closely related. Gays and lesbians make excellent parents because their children are planned for and truly wanted. They choose to become parents for the same reasons heterosexuals do: to impart our love, our knowledge and our heritages to our children. According to Dr. Charlotte Patterson of the University of Virginia, writing in a 1992 issue of Child Development (considered the best journal in the field), a review of this research reveals that firstly, not a single study showed any difference in the children's level of emotional adjustment, whether raised by heterosexual or gay parents.

Secondly, children raised by lesbian or gay parents were no more or less likely to be homosexual than other children. Thirdly, boys showed no differences in tendency toward "masculine" behavior, mannerisms or interests, and girls showed no differences in "femininity". Lastly, despite the existence of social prejudice, children with lesbian or gay parents did just as well as other children socially and academically. It is love, not biology, that makes a family.

On the other hand, marriage is the bringing together of the two sexes. That is the whole point. Marriage is for procreation. Although most people marry with the intention of someday starting families, the married couples who do not have children still have the potential for becoming mothers and fathers, either biologically or through adoption.

Marriage is societal good even without children, as husbands and wives serve as role models for children in their neighborhoods. Procreation is an important aspect of society's high regard for marriage, but it is not the only reason marriage is protected. Children do not benefit when homosexuality is presented as a neutral or positive lifestyle choice. Legalizing same-sex marriages 3/4 which, by biological definition, can never have anything to do with procreation 3/4 would obscure further still the vital link between marriage and children.

It would convey the message that childbearing, and childbearing, are matters entirely distinct from marriage. The message is subtle, but devastating. Marriage is not just a matter of feelings. It is the specifically defined legal, social, economic and spiritual union of a man and a woman. The two sexes must be present for it to be marriage. If that definition is radically altered based on the "feelings" of those in other relationships, then the sky is the limit.

There is no logical reason for not letting several people marry, or for gutting other requirements, such as minimum age, blood relative status or even the limitation of the relationship to human beings. In my opinion, the traditional family 3/4 husband, wife, and natural children 3/4 is the only way societies have ever found of providing well for stability in the present and for our future. Nowadays, the rate of divorce is high. There is a lot of single parent family, which the children grow in such kind of family at greater risk of dropping out of school, alcohol and drug use, adolescent pregnancy and childbearing, mental illness, and suicide.

Allowing homosexual marriage would further dilute the uniqueness of marriage by their potential to fulfill an essential societal function. Gay marriage is a controversial topic, but in law, it is clearly defined. In September 1996, in anticipation of the Hawaii trial, Congress passed and Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The act defines marriage for federal purposes as "a legal union of one man and one woman as husband and wife", thus denying same-sex spouses any federal benefits that are automatically given to opposite-sex spouses. The act also gives states the option of not recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states. In the whole U.S., gay people want to get marry, no way..