Schindler's List example essay topic

Schindler's List is one of the most powerful movies of all time. It presents the indelible true story of enigmatic German businessman Oskar Schindler who becomes an unlikely saviour of more than 1100 Jews amid the barbaric Nazi reign. A German Catholic war profiteer, Schindler moved to Krakow in 1939 when Germany overran Poland. There he opens an enamelware factory that, on the advice of his Jewish accountant Itzhak Stern, was staffed by Jews from the nearby forced labour camp at Plaszow.

Schindler's factory prospered though his contacts with the Nazi war machine and its local representatives, as well as his deft skill on the black market. Then, somewhere along the way, Schindler's devotion to self-interest was supplanted by a desire to protect as many Jews as possible. This desire ultimately grew into "Schindler's List", which was directly responsible for sparing the lives of 1100 Jews - a charming and sly entrepreneur, Schindler bribed and befriended the Nazi authorities and managed to get them released from the labour camp and brought to the safety of his munitions factory in Czechoslovakia. Aspects of good and evil are portrayed in a number of different ways throughout the film, "Schindler's List". The story of Schindler's List reminds us that there is hope; that sometimes the actions of one person - one ordinary person even, for Oskar Schindler is not the stereotypical altruistic hero - can make a difference, even in the face of mass apathy and evil. Schindler was a womanizer, on the verge of being a drunk and held to dubious business practices.

To think that this self centred man would become known for a shining moment of salvation for so many is almost beyond belief. Oskar Schindler is not a humanitarian or a force for 'good' in the typical sense. He is depicted within the film as a man that simply found himself in a unique position and rose to the occasion. Evil on the other hand, is epitomized throughout the film by the actions of those involved in the Nazi regime, in particular Amon Goeth who was in charge of the forced labour camp at Plaszow. However, emotion is not only conveyed through the actions of the main characters. Colour also has a significant impact on how good and evil is portrayed within the film.

Perhaps the most moving image in Steven Spielberg's epic, Schindler's List, condenses all of the sadism of the Nazi regime into one small pictorial area. One of only four colour images in a black and white film spanning over three hours, the little girl in a red coat, making her way, aimless and alone through the madness and chaos, compels Schindler's attention during the liquidation of the Jewish ghetto. Schindler identifies with the child, the plight of the little girl touches him in a way the sheer numbers make unreal - this image transforms the faceless mass around him into one palpable human being. This figure serves as a moral reawakening for Schindler, his conscience consequently kicks into gear. The poignant yet subtle musical score also adds to the haunting atmosphere created by the film. Through Schindler's dealings with the Nazis he comes into contact with Amon Goeth, an embattled and difficult character who was in charge of the forced labour camp at Plaszow.

At one time he was evil and callous enough to randomly shoot Jewish workers from his balcony for target practice, yet he also felt the stirrings of human emotion, evidenced in his inexplicable attraction to Helen Hirsch, his Jewish housemaid. Somewhere inside he is in love with her, but his inability to see Jews as human beings makes it impossible for him to realise these emotions. During one particularly affecting scene, Goeth came within inches of kissing Helen, but instead, he ended up beating her. Goeth is a good example of the depths to which 'Schindler's List' delves into all its characters, refusing to see straight good and evil. Goeth is as depraved and stupid as a human can possibly be, yet he is still human, and through the film we see him as such.

Through the experience I have gained within my lifetime I have noticed that in general people who lead good and just lives are happier than those who do not. I have also observed that most people who follow the path of good succeed, whereas those who do not often fail. Although there are several exceptions to this inference, these exceptions are almost always in the short term. From my life experience, in the long term those who follow the path of evil pay for it, while those who do good are rewarded. Consequently, I have chosen to do good in my life rather than evil and I believe that I am a happier and more successful person because of this choice..