Schlosser's Book example essay topic
He paints a very graphic image of hypocrisy in the policies of the U.S. government by examining the power of the economy of the underground and the misuse of government resources in legislating morality to its public... II. Major Issues In each of the authors essays in this book, is the truth of the smut and other things of the American ideal. You could say it is a little bit Weber's Protestant Ethic meets Larry Flynt. In each scenario, whether through agricultural facility and personal liberties, in the case of marijuana criminalization; immigrants in search of a better life, in the case of stigmatized farm workers; or punishing a successful businessman because of his lack of morals, Eric Schlosser returns to the unpleasant image of America as a bundle of hypocrisies. On one level, each scenario is of an American archetype of success.
For a country that prides itself on its immigrant history, hard-work ethic, and financial success stories, it seems strange to make these folks look like the villains. This is what Eric Schlosser is getting at: that these people would be heroes if the American ideal were anything more than a myth. Forgotten in that ideal, rationalized somehow, is the fact that our national heritage also includes a strong grounding in Puritanical morality somewhat. This is perhaps one of the most dissatisfying aspects of Schlosser's book, that the exploration of our moral grounding is never explored all that deeply, even though it is criticized. However, it is indisputable that the author, Schlosser, feels that the American ideal has a dangerous and powerful hold on the public consciousness, which he demonstrates repeatedly and faithfully in the book. In his criticism of the perversion that morality can play in public judgment, Schlosser uses an interesting crusader from 19th-century New England as an example to illustrate the degree to which Puritanism has swayed the reaction to social vices here in the United States.
Anthony Comstock was a grocery clerk from New York who mobilized groups such as the YMCA in the 1870's to suppress obscene materials. To Comstock's favor, the United States Congress in 1873 passed the 'Comstock Law,' which prohibited the transmittal of 'obscene, lewd, or lascivious' items through the Postal Service. Crusading through the postal service lines for the next several decades, Comstock harshly enforced these laws with the full support of the federal government behind him. Comstock's motivation came largely from an incident as a young boy in which he was shown pornography by farm workers, obviously causing him to be disturbed by this for the rest of his life. Clearly, Schlosser presents Comstock as a caricature of intolerance that many would disregard as an episode from our past. However, Schlosser's intent is not merely to mock a man who many of us would regard as extremely prim.
Comstock is but one example in American history of those who have imposed a personal and moralistic agenda on the nation. American history is laced with such individuals, and further, the public shows a large degree of acceptance for such policies.. Conclusion Criticism of the book is tangled with the very reasons that makes it an enjoyable read. Critics on the political right would accuse him of being a left-winger with a clear agenda, like myself, in a brightly packaged book. An honest liberal would have little with which to disagree.
But, Schlosser is not artfully interweaving his opinions into the body of these essays. He reserves opinion for the end of each essay, where he clearly states his beliefs under no terms, and what he regards as a sensible plan of action. If authors such as Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Ann Coulter took such an approach, they would be publishing pamphlets instead of thick volumes. So, in this regard, Schlosser is to be commended when he states clearly, without moral judgment or overstatement, in the conclusion about the decriminalization of medical marijuana. In fact, it is worth noting that Schlosser, like many of the authors of recent liberal books, provides a serious amount of research to substantiate his claims, suggesting that either liberals need to work harder to make themselves credible or that they simply have a better work ethic.
The dissatisfaction that comes for someone on the political left reading this book is the fact that Schlosser is preaching to the choir. Although he is a distinguished journalist and serious investigator, his shocking statistics and incitements for action are likely going to be met by receptive ears, which is to say, not those in positions to actually change policy. The cover and the title of this book are immediate deterrence for any Washington politicians to read this. Further, even those who might benefit from reading this literary work are unlikely to be swayed at all. Therefore, the question becomes what was Eric Schlosser's motivation in writing this book? Is his intent to inform the national debates over each of these topics, or is he attempting to establish himself as a liberal?
Perhaps, ironically, Schlosser's book is attractive for the same reasons that its subjects are, it is a type of book you do not want to be caught reading. In the United States, especially in the patriotic surge following the 2001 terrorist attacks, it is unfashionable to question nationalistic conventions. If teenagers are drawn to marijuana because their parents forbid it and married men are lured by the pornography stands because it is immoral, is it also possible that disenchanted citizens are tempted by a book that portrays its government and policies as laced with duplicity? We may never know. Table Of Contents. Introduction and Overview II.
Major Issues In The Book. Conclusion " Reefer Madness" overview.