Self Governing And Independent Nations example essay topic

The article also presents the six steps that help evaluate the eligibility of any particular group for gaining this right of self-determination. The features presented in the article show what particular aspects such as: Membership as a matter of belonging, not of achievement; common culture and other features shared by members of the group; character of a group that arises from the growing up within the boundaries of a group and other features as well. (What are the other features) All these features help evaluate the overall standpoint and possibilities of a particular group and also helps the group itself to find about itself: For example, given the importance c mutual recognition to members of these groups, they tend to develop con- venational means of identification, such as the use of symbolic object- participation in group ceremonies, special group manners, or special vocabulary, which help quickly to identify who is one of us and who is not. (Mar galit and Raz) (R&M call these encompass y groups) (What is R&M argument that determines it a group hts a right to self determination?) Now we need to evaluate Native Americans groups in their struggle to gain national self-determination.

Taking into account the six features we may conclude that they have this right because they are a group of people that have their own culture and historically they belong to the territory that they live right now. In order to justify this assumption we are going to look upon what is stated in the articles from the appendix A and B. According to Churchill there actually is no necessity to grant the right of national self-government for the tribes of the Native Americans living in the area of the United States. (No the conclusion) The Treatment for them is less harsh than in any other place in the world, but still they actually need to be governed by the government of the United States. In this case the overall satisfaction of (churchill's not hold this) people with their lives is projected to be better because of the skills they have in governing the state.

The constant conflict persists between the Native American tribes living in the Northern areas of the US and Canada and between the government of the mentioned states upon an issue of national self-determination. Bear in mind that there is a distinction between nations and states. There is a rough consensus among analysts of virtually all ideological persuasions that a nation consists of any body of people, independent of its size, who are bound together by a common language and set of cultural beliefs, possessed of a defined or definable land base sufficient to provide an economy; and evidencing the capacity to govern themselves. (Churchill) (page?) (do native Americans meet these criteria's?) It is also mentioned that long ago, before the European invasion, Native American tribes lived as fully self-sufficient, self-governing, and independent nations and they felt no need for changes. But changes actually took place and therefore it is necessary to start up the argumentation from the standpoint that currently exists at the moment of the issue being disputed.

Churchill states that there is an alternative way of settling conflicts between the national group leaders and this alternative approach is expressed in making treaties between the governments. Several of such treaties were already established back in 18th and 19th Centuries between the US government and Native Minorities and as well the Canadian government also had some treaties. But not all of the conditions of the treaties were held and therefore there always are disputes between the treaties participants over the conditions that never satisfy all of the sides. Here is an abstract from Churchill article that provides the example of a treaty statement: To quote Attorney General Wirt again: So long as a tribe exists and remains in possession of its lands, its title and possession are sovereign and exclusive. We treat with them as separate sovereignties, and while an Indian nation continues to exist within its acknowledged limits, we have no more right to enter upon their territory than we have to enter upon the territory of [any] foreign prince. (Churchill) (Page? ).