Service Business With Technology example essay topic
In 1993, Lou Gerstner was brought in to run IBM. He moved the company's focus to services, and re-established IBM as the biggest computer consulting and services company in the world. However, nearly after a decade, Big Blue was still losing money on PCs, a market it helped launch. Gerstner was succeeded by Samuel J. Palmisano in 2002. The New Blue under the Leadership of Palmisano The style of Sam Palmisano may be understated compared to his predecessor, Louis Gerstner. But the strategy moves the 52 year old has made since he became the chairman and chief executive of IBM less than two years ago have been bold, even risky.
If successful, his strategy promises to redefine not only IBM, but also what it means to be a computer company. IBM is no longer content to be merely a supplier of hardware and software, and seeks to become more a side-by-side partner with businesses - helping them improve their marketing, planning, procurement and customer service. The aim is to create a very deep connection between IBM and its customers, and at that level it is a very powerful strategy. But it's making IBM more like a service business with technology thrown in than a technology business. To pursue this strategy, Palmisano needed to add expertise in business consulting and software. In 2002 the largest purchases came when he acquired PricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting for $3.5 billion and Rational Software for $2.1 billion.
More fundamental changes have come in 2003, and some are just now falling into place. In particular, IBM has shaken up its software, services, and research divisions. With the addition of PwC Consulting, the big IBM services unit is more focused on executive-level business consulting instead of traditional technology services. If Palmisano's overhaul of IBM proves successful, the company could gain a long-term competitive advantage, as it did from big bets of the past - such as its pioneering mainframe computers in the 1960's. For IBM, the strategy also moves the centre of gravity in its relationships with corporate customers further from its traditional mainstay, the mainframe, and closer to business consulting services. Some large customers who have watched the new game plan unfold are impressed both by its scope and its early impact.
"Sam Palmisano took a real gamble with a strategy that changes how IBM does business,' said Raymond E. Go gel, chief information officer of Xcel Energy, America's fourth-largest oil and gas utility. Palmisano likes to say that his plan is bold but not really risky because IBM is just following customer demand. Companies are less enamoured of technology itself than in what technology can do for them - the practical benefits, or solutions, he says. In the summer of 2003, Palmisano asked IBM employees to share their thoughts online about what the company's future values should be. The results were distilled to three: customer relationships, innovation, and trust. The stuff might sound melodramatic, but they touch on a home truth of the technology business: corporate customers don't so much buy technology products, since the technology changes so fast, as invest in a relationship with a trusted supplier.
Palmisano's strategy is to make IBM, more than any other, that trusted company. IBM will probably never return to anything like its days of dominance in the 1960's and 70's. Yet if Palmisano succeeds, the new IBM could be one that enjoys prosperity for years. Relation of the Case to Classroom Discussions The case addresses the three most important issues of strategic management: vision, formulation of strategies and implementation.
The New Blue is a living example of how a creative vision and the right strategies can transform a lumbering giant into a profitable services titan. Reflections of our group For most companies, the whole business environment is in flux. It isn't due to one thing, but many. The Internet plays a big part in this and so do other technology changes including wireless. Other changes come from differences in the way that business is done with the outsourcing of whole business functions, the integration of supply chains and deeper focus on customer relationships.
To this we can add: economic forces, government regulations and globalization. To remain competitive in the face of such forces, businesses have to be able to implement change quickly. 'On Demand' is about implementing change quickly - at its best it would mean that a business could decide to alter the way it did business and implement it yesterday. 'On Demand' is about 'time to business transformation'. 'On demand' is an enterprise whose business processes - integrated end-to-end across the company and with key partners, suppliers and customers - can respond with speed to any customer demand, market opportunity or external threat. This is a concept that will work for organizations large and small, as long as IBM delivers products and services that contribute to delivering the vision.
It looks like Palmisano's idea is not just to market the 'on demand' business message, but to turn IBM into an example for others to follow. IBM is setting a corporate example by integrating its business. It is hoping to become the company that best understands business transformation and best enables it. 'On Demand' is a strongly differentiated stand and, if IBM can execute on its vision and deliver technology to match, it will do well..