Several Examples Of The Geologic Column example essay topic
Geologic Column Cenozoic Era Quaternary 1 Men Tertiary 74 Mammals Mesozoic Era Cretaceous 60 Reptiles Jurassic 30 & Triassic 40 Flowering Plants Paleozoic Era Permian 25 Amphibians, Ferns, Pennsylvanian 25 & Mississippian 25 Conifers 45 First Land Plants And Fish Devonian Silurian 35 Ordovician 65 Invertebrates Cambrian 80 Pre-Cambrian Era 1 TO 2 BILLION YEARS AGO Evolutionists say that there are several examples in rock of all these different eras. But what they tend to ignore is that if fossils for the geologic record were assembled together in layers in one location, those layers would extend 130 miles into the earths crust. The earths crust is only 25-30 miles deep. What comes, as a shock to most students of geology, myself included, is that the geologic column does not exist anywhere It is just a paper column. The Grand Canyon is supposed to be one of the very best examples of the exposed geologic column. Evolutionists claim that it represents more tha a billion years of life history.
But if you were to look at the strata of the Grand Canyon, you would notice that 8 periods are missing. Grand Canyon Strata Permian Pennsylvanian Mississippian Cambrian Precambrian That is 325 billion years of missing strata. Another problem that evolutionary geologists have faced is the problem of flip-flopped strata. By that I mean that there are several places where strata from an ancient period will be found on top of the strata of a more recent time. An example for this point is an area in Wyoming near Yellowstone Park. Here there is a sixty mile long stretch of Paleozoic strata laying on top of Tertiary strata which is 250 million years younger.
According to the geologic column this would be impossible. Another blatant example of flip- flopped strata is found in the Swiss Alps on a mountain called Mythen Peak. This chart dramatically illustrates this point. Textbook Arrangement in Geologic Table the Mythen Peak Eocene Cretaceous Paleocene Cretaceous Jurassic Jurassic Triassic Triassic Eocene In Dr. Walter Laments says in his article Growing Doubts: Is Evolution Theory Valid. The actual percentage of areas showing this progressive order from the simple to the complex is surprisingly small.
Indeed formations with very complex forms of life are found resting directly on the basic granites. Furthermore, I have in my own files a list of over 500 cases that attest to a reverse order, that is simple forms of life resting on top of more advanced types. These instances are very confusing to supporters of evolution. Sir Archibald Geikie, Director General of the British Geological Survey, said about the areas where the textbook strata are so mixed up. Had these sections been planned for the purpose of deception, they could have not been more skillfully devised; and no one coming first to this ground would suspect that what appears to be a normal stratigraphical sequence is not really so How much more proof do you need to show that the geologic column was created by man on paper and is never shown to be true through actual fossil or geological evidence If the geologic time table idea of ancient earth history were true, people could expect to see these following circumstances in the geo-record. 1.
The oldest strata would not contain as many life forms as the younger strata. 2. The earliest types of life will be very simple. 3. As the strata went from the lower and oldest strata to the younger upper strata you would see a clear cut picture of evolutionary development from primitive organisms to more advanced organisms.
The truth is however is that there is no complete evidence of this. All the fossil record shows us is that all life started in the Cambrian period. If evolutionists were correct there would be a gradual progression into the life of the Cambrian period, which there is not. Even Walter Sullivan who is a supporter of evolution stated that The entire first part of evolutionary history is missing Scientist can not explain the absence of life forms in the Pre-Cambrian era. Another big problem with the geologic column is that science believes that Homo sapiens first appeared in the end of the quaternary period.
But if there were examples of humans living in periods before that time which would completely discredit the whole idea of the geologic time table. There are such examples. 1. A fossilized human skull, presumably from the Tertiary Period, was discovered. The Tertiary period is supposed to predate man by a long time. 2.
In 1829 a block of marble was discovered outside of Philadelphia. This block of marble was dated about 60 million years before modern man was supposed to appear. In this block of marble it appeared as some one had carved two letters which resembled a U and an I. Scientist claim that the age of this block of marble predated anyone who could carve such letters. 3.
A report was made of a thimble that was found encased in a lump of coal taken from 300 feet below the surface. The coal was dated from between the Tertiary and the Cretaceous period, which is supposed to be from long before the appearance of man. 4. Evolutionist believe that dinosaurs went extinct 70 million years before the appearance of man. But yet several cases have been reported of human tracks found in the same levels of strata as dinosaur foot prints. 5.
In Moab, Utah human remains were discovered in Cretaceous rock. The Cretaceous period was supposed to be 100 million years before that time. 6. There are several instances of cave drawings of dinosaur type creatures.
According to scientist this would be impossible because early humans would have never had contact with dinosaurs. I think this would be enough evidences to disprove evolution. But since there are skeptics out there I have gathered more information to prove my point. Evolutionists say that no advanced mammals lived at the same time as dinosaurs. What I mean by that, is the only mammals that were thought to live at the same time as dinosaurs were only about the size of a mouse.
Dr Hubbard has discovered, several places where large mammal footprints such as elephants in the same strata as that of dinosaurs. So as you can see, the many questions that I have brought up tend to proof that the geologic column false. There is not even a 50% chance that it is true. I encourage everyone to research what he or she is being taught as fact and make sure that it is factual. You will be surprised to learn that a lot of which is taught, as fact is just a theory that certain people want to believe as truth.