Shopping Mall In Elm City example essay topic

Analytical Writing The construction last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City was a mistake. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage and arrests for crime and vagrancy have increased in nearby Oak City Park. Elm City should pay attention to the example of the Oak City Mall and deny the application to build a shopping mall in Elm City. Analyzing this argument brings up a lot of questions to whether this is a relevant argument or not. A lot of assumptions are made on not enough facts to support them. Itc an be said that the mall could have directly or indirectly been a part of the problems.

The problems are: Increase in crime and vagrancy, businesses closing, and a parking shortage. It is not logical to say that it is sole cause of the situation. This argument states that the building of the mall is the reason that some businesses have went out of business. To say that the mall and the closes of the businesses go hand in hand is not totally accurate. There are a number of reasons that could have led to the closing of the businesses. For one example, you could say that a change in the economy might have led to the closures.

If this occurred after the holidays, it could say that people spent most of their money during this time and it could have hurt some businesses beyond the point of repair. Also, this argument doesn't state what kinds of businesses had troubles. If it was something as in a grocery store, the mall could not be the cause because the mall doesn't interfere directly with the food industry. Also, a majority of small businesses succumb to larger ones. This area is not exempt to the possibilities that this is what could have happened. This argument does not state if mergers of smaller companies related to the statement.

The argument tries to tie together that a parking shortage was caused by the Oak City Mall. While in turn the mall would bring increased foot traffic, it would also bring along more commerce to the city, thus businesses should not have struggled as previously mentioned. A number of factors could have added to the parking shortage. With most communities now, population increases every year. Some years the population jumps dramatically. This directly relates to the parking problem.

With more population, comes more cars, which leads to more parking needed. In addition, the argument also says that crime and vagrancy has increased due to the creation of the shopping center. Regarding the statement in the previous paragraph, population growth brings problems to some locations. Crime for the most part depends on population. Crime grows as population grows and so on. Vagrancy can not really even be said to be related to the mall.

With the mall brings new jobs and opportunities, not less work and housing. The Vagrancy increase could be because law officers have cracked down on vagrancy as a whole. If no real statistic was shown before this argument was made, there in no way to say if this is even a pressing issue. To actually use this argument to make a point as it sits is difficult. To make the issues relate to the argument, you need a lot of additional facts and figures. A census should have been compared to the mall, before and after its erection.

And to also try to relate this argument to a completely different city is unrealistic. Every city differs and has its own problems and issues to deal with. An argument like this cannot honestly be taking at full worth. The topography of the two towns can be completely different. In conclusion, the report makes good assumptions to what possibly could have ina mall is built in Elm City, but these are only assumptions and no guarantees can coincide with them.