Sir Isaac Newton example essay topic
He devoted much of his time to the principle studies of mathematics, science, and philosophy. Leibniz's contribution in mathematics was in the year 1675, when he discovered the fundamental principles of infinitesimal calculus. He arrived at this discovery independently at the same time along with the English scientist Sir Isaac Newton in 1666. However, Leibniz's system was published in 1684, three years before Newton published his. Also at this time Leibniz's method of notation, known as mathematical symbols, were adopted universally.
He also contributed in 1672 by inventing a calculating machine that was capable of multiplying, dividing, and extracting square roots. All this made him to be considered a pioneer in the development of mathematical logic. Sir Isaac Newton is the other major figure in the development of Calculus. Hew as an English mathematician and physicist, whose considered to be one of the greatest scientists in history. Newton was born on December 25, 1642 atWoolsthorpe, near Grantham in Lincolnshire. He attended Trinity College, at the University of Cambridge.
He received his bachelor's degree in 1665 and received his master's degree in 1668. However, there he ignored much of the universities established curriculum to pursue his own interests: mathematics and natural philosophy. Almost immediately, he made fundamental discoveries in both areas. Newtons discoveries was made up of several different things.
It consisted of combined infinite sums which are known as infinite series. It also consisted of the binomial theorem for f rational exponents and the algebraic expression of the inverse relation between tangents and areas into methods that we refer to today as calculus. However, the story is not that simple. Being that both men were so-called universal geniuses, they realized that in different ways they were entitled to have the credit for "inventing calculus". Both engaged in a violent dispute over priority in the invention of calculus. Unfortunately, Newton had the upper hand, considering that he was the president of the Royal Society.
He used this position to to select a committee that would investigate the unsolved question. Apparently, Newton included himself on this committee (illegally) and submitted a false report that charged Leibniz with deliberate plagiarism. He was also the one who compiled the book of evidence that the "society" was supposed to publish. In my opinion, I believe that Leibniz was entitled to the credit more than Newton was.
For one, the phrase "First come, First serve". I also think that anyone who has to go about getting things in a scandalous way doesn't deserve any recognition at all. Consequently, because of Newton's sneaky actions he got the glamour he wanted. For example, when I was doing my research I read where they had distinctively put Newton before Leibniz by using the phrase "respectively". In conclusion, I believe that over the years credit has been given to the wrong person.