Sir Thomas More example essay topic

Whether it is accurate in all its details or not, A Man for All Seasons is an attempt to present the historical conflict between Thomas More and Henry V. The conflict could be viewed as merely a political one but neither history nor the filmmakers have viewed More's conduct purely in that light, although Henry followed a policy which advanced his personal power while it diminished the power of the Church of Rome. Sir Thomas More was a moral intellectual who adhered to principles that transcended political expediency... There was a point beyond which he was unwilling to compromise his personal convictions. Robert Bolt borrows some of Brecht's devices in creating his remarkable play, A Man for All Seasons. "I tried then for a bold and beautiful verbal architecture, a story rather than a plot, and overtly theatrical means of switching from one locale to another. I also used the most notorious of alienation devices, an actor who addresses the audience and comments on the action.

He is intended to draw the audience into the play". Bolt's narrator / participant is a brilliant creation in a tale about "Kings and Cardinals". Playing a half dozen parts as functionaries (e. g., servant, boatman, jailer, publican, etc. ), The Common Man sets the scenes and constantly reminds us that we are watching a play.

He also, and perhaps most importantly, adds his perspective on all these proceedings, forever reinforcing that he is the quintessential man on the street. Occasionally, he jumps right out of character, time, and period to give us an historical perspective. He's tricky, loquacious, charming, amusing and opinionated, and he most often speaks in the commonsense tones of everyday life. And yet as persuasive and amusing as The Common Man is, I think his true function is to kee the focus on the one uncommon man in the entire play-Sir Thomas More.

In a play ripe with religious and political ideas, kings and princes, cardinals and statesmen, the words "common, ordinary, commonsense, normal, and expected" pop up all the time. The good and the not so good use the words "expediency, reasonableness, and political necessity" to persuade More to give up his moral stance, which opposes Henry V's remarriage and, more important, Henry V's claim to supremacy over the church. One of the greatest legal minds of his day, More understands all the arguments for compromise and pragmatism and expediency. He searches for every legal loophole to stay alive, but he will not compromise his conscience. The personal conflict between More and Henry V is not as intense as that between Becket and the second Henry, but the real intellectual and moral agony involved and the frictions provoked by family responsibilities bring the period to life. These are real people struggling with their principles and their demons.

The theological and historical questions are played out together with personal, moral and ethical dilemmas. Papal supremacy, interpretation of scripture, indissolubility of marriage interface with the stability of the realm, the danger of Spain and greed for monastic riches. All intermingle with Henry V's desire for a son, his friendship with More, and his glandular drives. More's family, divided by the consequences of his legal hairsplitting as well as split by theological tensions, is much less concerned than he for the sanctity of his conscience. They want him to stay alive.

Yet the supremacy of the individual conscience as well as the difficulty of the politician reconciling his private conscience and his public duty are the major themes. Orson Welles' Wolsey, the venal Cromwell and the ambitious Richard Rich who sells his soul "for Wales" add ingredients that combine to hold any viewer's attention. For our specific purposes the film presents a reasonably accurate picture of the issues surrounding the early years of the English Reformation, the "King's Great Matter", the feeble English hierarchy, the creeping Calvinism of Cranmer, the catholic attitudes of the king, the compliance of the Parliament. It raises but does not answer the question of why the Reformation moved quickly and with comparatively little opposition in England.

More's trial brings many of these questions together and his final statement to the court summarizes not only his theology but shows the strength of his beliefs. The ethical and human dilemmas provide a perfect stage for encouraging deeper investigation of the historical issues. The very human aspects of the personal struggles provide an opportunity to emphasize the complexity of judging the people involved in this and other such dramas of the past and the present. Many of our heroes today are characterized by their tremendous physical strength, romantic appeal, and or by valor in battle. St. Thomas More is a rather unique hero since he is not a physically robust figure, slew no "Dragons", and was certainly not a romantic figure who appealed to fair maidens throughout England. Thomas More was an English statesman and writer.

More was born in London. In 1504 he entered Parliament, but was forced to retire from public life after urging a decrease in a proposed appropriation for King Henry 7. After the death of the king in 1509, More became active again. During the next decade, More attracted the attention of King Henry 8. Henry made More one of his favorites and often sought his company for philosophical conversations.

More became Lord Chancellor in 1529; he was the first layman to hold the post. His fortunes change, however, when he refused to support Henry's request for a divorce from Catherine of Aragon. More resigned from the chancellorship in 1532 and withdrew from public notice. The king had imprisoned him in 1534. More was tried the following year; he refused to take an oath of supremacy, asserting that Parliament did not have the right to usurp papal authority in favor of the king. More was decapitated in 1535.

In 1935 he was canonized by the Roman Catholic church. More is considered a hero because of his bravery for standing up for his morality. More had to go against his friend the king in order to stand up for what is right. More's faith in God and how he died for Him gave him the right to be considered a hero. More shows us that we should believe in what is right. He shows that even with ought using weapons and being a "stud" we could be heroes by following God.

When Henry V's first wife, Catherine of Aragon, is unable to produce an heir to the throne, he uses that as a pretext for the pope to grant him a divorce, so he can marry his newest conquest, Anne Boleyn. The King is backed by everyone on this request except the highly regarded and religious Sir Thomas More. When Cardinal Wolsey, Chancellor of England, names More as his successor, it becomes important for Henry to get More's support, but More cannot be swayed. Henry demands the clergy to renounce the Pope and to name him Head of the Church of England. Oliver Cromwell frames More, forcing him to resign as Chancellor.

Eventually More is brought to trial, found guilty of treason, and beheaded.