Soviet Union With Nuclear Missiles example essay topic
Thus, proving that regardless of the military advantage that the United States had over the Soviet Union, President Kennedy did not wish to initiate a nuclear war. Strong-Point / Introductory, Key Argument #1: Militaristic ally, the U.S. was in a significantly advantageous situation over Russia. If he wished to, Kennedy would have been capable of striking the Soviet Union with nuclear missiles". In 1962, the U.S. had an estimated 5 100 nuclear weapons while the Soviet Union had only approximately 300". The Soviet's Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM's) were 10 years behind what the Americans were producing". The Americans had stealth spy capabilities far greater than the Soviet so U. S spy satellites were focused on the Soviet".
X In 1962, Daniel Ells berg, part of the Rand Corporation and later publishing the Pentagon Papers on Vietnam, commented that to show the Russians the U.S. supremacy, ! SS it would be simpler to send Khrushchev the precise geographical coordinates of the Soviet ICBM bases at plesetsk, or even copies of the photographs taken by US satellites.! "o U-2 spy flights were constantly monitoring the progress of the Soviets in order to ensure accurate US Strategic Military planning". The U.S. had posted military bases surrounding the Soviet Union where until utilising Cuba, the Russian's were isolated to posting bases only in the Soviet Union. o In 1963, there were approximately one million US servicemen stationed in 203 bases in the United States and in 1 040 bases overseas. o Due to the NATO alliance and US foreign assistance programmes, there were another 3.5 million troops bordering the Soviet Union. Body, Key Argument #2: To eliminate the possibility that Kennedy may have wanted to initiate a nuclear war, and was influenced not to, Kennedy's personal advisors (his closest being finance and military) were pressuring him to initiate a nuclear war".
If Kennedy wished to have a nuclear war or merely considered it, he would be swayed by his assistants positively. o The biographer and historiographer of Assistant Defence Secretary Paul Nitze explained, ! SS Paul Nitze was leading the charge of the hawks. I didn't believe the President would consent to an! K strike on the missile bases in Cuba, but I was scared to death that Nitze, [Treasury Secretary Douglas] Dillon and General Maxwell Taylor would wear the president down.! " The Joint Chiefs of Staff were desperately urging a grand amphibious attack as well as an air strike on Cuba, having already gathered 42,000 men. o! San American invasion, still being urged by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, would almost certainly have provoked a nuclear attack upon the beachhead and the naval force [The United States of America]!
", General Lyman Lemnitzer, member of Joint Chiefs of Staff". The head of the Strategic Air Command, General Tommy Powers was amongst Kennedy's other assistants. He would publicly laugh off the effects of the radiation of a nuclear bomb (genetic mutation) while seriously applying pressure to Kennedy's decision to initiate a nuclear war. The whole idea is to kill the bastards! At the end of the war, if there are two Americans and one Russian, we win.! "Body, Key Argument #3: The Deterrence Theory can be applied to help explain why Kennedy did not wish to initiate a nuclear war".
The Deterrence Theory The Deterrence Theory is when there is an aggressive arms race to the point that both powers in question are afraid to attack each other in fear of retaliation". In the heat of the crisis, Kennedy and Khrushchev had conversed twice, privately through telegrams in hope of reaching an alternate solution maintaining peace in both the US and the Soviet Union. Both letters describe the deterring attitude Kennedy had towards war. o Kennedy's response towards conducting a full scale invasion was, ! SS We were prevented from using our 5 100 nuclear weapons because!
K whatever damage we did to you, you would have enough left to inflict unacceptable damage on the United States.! " o In Khrushchev's second letter to Kennedy (the only one which Kennedy responded to and agreed with) Khrushchev commented, ! SS What good would it have done me in the last hour of my life to know that though our great nation and the US were in complete ruin, the national honour of the Soviet Union was intact?! " " If all of the nuclear warheads being delivered to Cuba's coast were fully operational, their initial strike would be powerful enough to immobilize 85 per cent of the US Strategic Forces. Pre-Conclusion, Key Argument #4: From 1961-1962, as the conflict between the US and the Soviet Union was escalating, Kennedy had an anti-communist ideology to stand for but a lot to lose in the readily growing US Empire".
Financially, the United States was a very rich and growing country. A nuclear war would seriously halt; if not permanently damage the growth of Kennedy's empire. o A nuclear bomb would sever entire states". X Consequently, there will be unaffordable repair costs". The health statistics summary made by the United States Department of Health and Services for 1963 showed an extensively upward-sloped curve on the subject infant mortality and various disease ratios in the US. o The radiation of one nuclear bomb is enough to genetically dismember a city as big as Chicago while also causing infant mortality and genetic mutation for decades after". X The Soviet Union had 300 operational nuclear bombs.
Bibliography
Finklestein, Norman. Thirteen Days / Ninety Miles: The Cuban Missile Crisis. New York. Simon and Schuster, 1994.
HRSA Information Centre.! SS Child Health USA 2002.
Health Resources and Services Administration. 2002.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 4 Apr, 2005.
Keel. O, Robert.! SS Sociology of Deviant Behaviour.! " Rational Choice and Deterrence Theory. 1992.
Sociology 200-Robert Keel. 2 Apr, 2005.
The Cuban Missile Crisis. 1997.
ThinkQuest Team 11046.1 April 2005.
web. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2002.
2 Apr, 2005.
Walker, Martin. The Cold War: A History. Stoddart Publishing Co. Limited, Canada, 1994.
Welch, John. The Cold War Museum. 2001.
The Cold War Museum Inc. 31 March 2005.