Spank Children example essay topic

According to people. biola. edu / faculty /paul / sparetherod. htm, they have set guidelines for disciplinary spanking. Dr. Den Trumbull advises that if a child has not behaved after verbal correction or time-out, then spanking is an effective method for the child who refuses to obey his parents. He says that a parent should not spank the child for revenge, but by love for the purpose of wanting the child to learn that he has done wrong. He believes spanking is not necessary and inappropriate before 15 months of age and after 10 years of age, and should always be planned, not a reaction. Also, spanking should never cause injury and should never be done in public to avoid humiliation. According to religious tolerance. org / spanking. htm, they believe in corporal punishment due to the principles of the Bible.

In Proverbs 23: 14, it says, "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell". They believe that the abandonment of of spanking will increase violence and criminal activity. According to geocities. com / Athens/Forum/4255/child. html, Karen Swift gives a three-step disciplining process called A-C-T, which simply means to acknowledge the child, communicate the limits, and target two choices or giving the child options. They believe that you should praise your children and also, that the Bible is the best guideline on child discipline. They say the first 5-6 years of a child's life is to teach compliance and the remaining childhood years is to teach responsibility. According to victorious. org / spank. htm, it says the abundance of crime is due to the lack of spanking in the home.

They believe it was a mistake to remove corporal punishment from the public school system. They believe that child abuse by dysfunctional parents has caused society to overreact toward all corporal punishment. Also, this website states that if you love your children, then you should discipline them. ABCNEWS. com: Poll: Mostapproveofspankingkids uses empirical evidence. The state that 60% of Americans approve of spanking children. 73% of Southerners approve of spanking children, compared to 60% elsewhere.

On the other hand, there are other people and websites that are against spanking. For example, no spank. net. sexdngrs. htm state that spanking a child in the buttocks is a sexual violation. Its says if slapping an adult's butt is considered a sexual offense then why should it be any different with a child's. According to stophitting. com, they believe that hitting children may actually increase misbehavior. They state that those who weren't spanked when they were younger turned out to be healthier. It says that people seem to misunderstand the scripture.

Those who spank their children teaches acceptance of violence. In apa. org / releases /spanking. html, they believe the more often you spank your child, the more likely they are to be aggressive or to have mental problems. Corporal punishment is not effective when the parent is not around to administer it, and it doesn't teach the child right from wrong. According to slc. sevier. org / corpus. htm, when certain materials such as canes, paddles, and belts are used to spank children, it causes physical injuries such as ruptured blood vessels and muscle damage. Ears, eyes, and brains can be permanently damaged as a result of paddling. Stophitting. com states that spanking perpetuates a cycle of child abuse, could cause bruises and broken bones, and is much more used on poor children, minorities, children with disabilities, and boys.

In my opinion, I still believe that spanking your child is very effective and is necessary. I understand why those who are against corporal punishment feel the way they feel because of certain experiences or empirical evidences. Before I read all these articles on spanking children, I never thought that it would actually cause your child to be more aggressive and that it could cause mental problems. At first, I was a 100% towards spanking your child but now I can say I am about 50/50 on both debates. I don't think there is a clear, unambiguous answer to this debate because both make a lot of sense. Those who support corporal punishment have good points and views as well as those who are against corporal punishment.

I lean towards supporting corporal punishment because it was used on me and I feel I am very healthy and perfectly normal. Those who are against corporal punishment seemed to be more persuasive only because they had more empirical evidence and conducted more researches than those who supported it. More facts were used when it came to those trying to stop corporal punishment. The website that caught my most attention was no spank. net / sexdngrs because I never thought in a million years that spanking your child to discipline them could sexually arouse the human being. I still don't believe that spanking a child is a form of sexual violation.

I think it's just another excuse for someone who is against corporal punishment to use to make their case sound better..