Spending Of Foreign Aid example essay topic

Foreign Aid Cultural Geography Bret BalankyThe United States of America is a wealthy nation. We are also a nation that reaches out to the poverty-stricken world, lending financial aid in ridiculous amounts to these shambled countries. The burning question of the moment is: how effect is our foreign aid, and what can we do to improve its efficiency? The answer is quite a difficult one, if it even exists at all.

Foreign aid has been lent to these broken countries for over half of a century. Billions of dollars has been poured into this defunct outlet, with nothing really to show for it. The thing one must understand about foreign aid and where and how it is spent is that all of these subsidies are given directly to the government. The thing is, this government might not have the purest intentions. More than once, the recipients of this aid have been accused of wasting foreign aid on palaces and their decadent lifestyle, in general. We know foreign aid doesn't work the way it should, yet we make no strides towards improving it at the expense of our own taxpayers.

Another reason why foreign aid is ineffective is that it leads the inhabitants of the poor, ran-down country to believe that they simply cannot do it on their own. They have to rely on our money to get anything going, which is a dangerous game. We " re not letting these countries stand on their own feet, and that isn't good for them, and it damn sure isn't good for us. What if one of these countries that we " re pouring money into becomes powerful and acquires nuclear weaponry?

If we cut funding, they might become belligerent towards the United States, and then what? We give them more money, like some kind of hostage with a knife to our throat? As Bauer wrote in his book, The Development Frontier in 1991: "Economic achievement depends on personal, cultural, social, and political factors... and the policies of rulers. It diminishes the people of the Third World to suggest that unlike the people of the West, they cannot achieve it without subsidies". Imagine pouring millions upon millions of dollars into an interventionist state with counterproductive economic policies such as high taxes, spending and borrowing, excessive regulation, protectionism, inflation, price controls, land collectivization, and outright corruption. They " re going to be able to avoid a civil rebellion through quelling the hunger of the masses with our financial aid.

How is that right? It's even been said that these governments may have damaged themselves economically to attract foreign aid from the United States, or other First World countries. This may be terrible for their economies, but it helps consolidate political power and enriches them at the same time. For a corrupt government official, there's not an easier con in the book. That's all that it is, too: a con.

I am firmly against such loose distribution of foreign aid. It is utterly ridiculous, that with all of our manpower and specialization, that we cannot have someone oversee the spending of foreign aid, creating some sort of intermediary organization to regulate its usage. It seems logical and attainable, and it should be done quickly, or we " re going to keep losing millions of dollars on corruption and misuse. Foreign aid should be discontinued indefinitely until a better way to distribute it is found.