Sports Marketing example essay topic
Corporations are a very good example of effective mass advertising simply because of their size and high profile positions. Still, despite the enormity of these organizations, if they wish to continue their success among competitors they must adhere to the same rules as their smaller counterparts or suffer a nose dive in revenues. Things like cost and return must be considered in any marketing campaign that wishes to be successful. Anheuser-Busch is a super power in the world market. Primarily a manufacturer of beer, this corporation like many others has expanded into a variety of other markets to include, but not limited to: retail, tourism, foods, and theme parks; to name a few. For this investigation I shall take an in-depth look at this company's stake in one of the world's biggest sporting matches, the Super Bowl- a significant event and relative smorgasbord of advertising that reaches millions of consumers simultaneously.
The news article "Bud-maker a major player in the sports world" appeared in an online news column written by reporter Scott Warner on MSNBC. COM February 4, 2005. This is the article I have chosen to review in this presentation. The main subject of this article is a representative of Anheuser-Bush, Tony Ponturo, whose job is to travel around the country to various sporting events and examine the market to which his employer tailors. It is largely his decision that dictates how this corporate brewer will approach the sale of its product. While, from an entertainment aspect, this article may be seen as focusing on the exploits of a man who, by many men's standards, has a job to be greatly envied, it offers a wonderful insight into the consumer market we live in and a snap-shot view of the way businesses analyze production and sales.
You don't have to be a football fan to look forward to the biggest NFL game of the year. In recent years, the commercials aired during the game have become as much of a crowd winner as the game itself. This boom in popularity has set the stage for one of the largest advertising fiascos of the year. With the eyes of millions of potential buyers glued to the T.V. set for the four hour time slot, manufacturers and retailers have poured countless resources into producing and airing ads that will satisfy the ever-higher expectations of the viewing public and entice them to spend their money on the goods they offer. Companies bid millions of dollars for a thirty second time slot during the highly publicized game and none of the mega-spenders have more stock in the event than the 'King of Beers,' Budweiser.
This year the brewery giant is running ten ads during the Super Bowl valued at more than $25 million dollars. Overall the company has spent more than $100 million dollars in advertising through the NFL alone. Anheuser-Busch expenditures on sports advertising total over $300 million dollars annually and it is Mr. Ponturo who they pay to decide how this money should be spent. The article explains how these sports franchises are more than happy to have an organization like Anheuser-Busch on board. These leagues view the beer company not just as an advertiser, but an asset to their own business. The many considerations a producer must make in determining the best approach to its market are illustrated in this commentary of Budweiser's marketing plan for the big football game.
Let's take a look at how all of this influences the economy and its relationship to our studies in microeconomics. What could possibly justify spending $2.5 million dollars for thirty seconds of air time? When we look at the term "opportunity cost", it tells us that decisions are made based on the value of the best opportunity forgone. In this case, that means spending hundreds of millions of dollars annually in sports marketing has enough return to make it worth such a large expenditure. In terms of marketing, there is something called 'residual effects. ' The huge sum paid for a single commercial slot now becomes worth it because of all the free air time it will get in the days after.
Major web sites dedicate sections to the Super Bowl commercials and millions of consumers log on to view the ads again and vote for their favorite. TV stations replay them on their news programs, people download and e-mail their favorites to friends and the cycle is repeated over and again until the residual effects have more than paid for the commercial. Budweiser's high profile banner during the World Series is another example of this phenomenon. With the replay the ad got on sports channels and news programs in the following week the advertisement was considered at no cost for the company.
Why would a sports franchise consider an advertiser to be an asset to its own business? Besides the obvious monetary benefits from advertising revenues in this case, having such a prominent figure as Budweiser in their stadiums creates positive spin-off spending for the teams. Fans who go to the concessions for a cold brew will also buy the stadiums overpriced snack items. Budweiser sponsorship on team merchandise helps to move hats, shirts, etc. into the hands of cheering fans.
Half-time shows are bolstered to new levels by funding from advertisers and, in turn, bring in more spectators and boost ticket sales". Our research tells us, and probably our gut tells us, that the consumer is a sports fan and if we can be involved in their passion, and things they " re interested in, then that's a way for us to sell our product", -Tony Ponturo This shows how specialization and exchange benefits multiple parties. In this case, Anheuser-Busch benefits from the focused market the sporting events create and the team franchises are rewarded with advertising income and secondary spending revenues". As an advertiser, you " re trying to chase the elusive consumer. Where are they going? And where are they landing?" -Tony Ponturo To see how this situation can affect the economy as a whole one must only look at the expansive list of programs established by Anheuser-Busch to benefit an array of groups in the communities to which it does business.
While largely in taste of public relations from the corporation's standing point, these programs all qualify as secondary effects from an economic view. A complete listing and links to information on these programs can be found at the company's online website. This list includes programs such as environmental awareness, game conservation, alcohol education and designated driver promotion. These are all good examples of how secondary effects influence not just the people who buy and sell beer, but many other parties through these indirect methods.
So as this article demonstrates, companies can have a powerful influence over the entire economy whether or not we, as individuals, choose to buy their products. Anyone who watches the Super Bowl this Sunday will be subjected to the marketing campaigns of multiple companies regardless of whether they do business with them or not. A quick glance at the financial statement of Anheuser-Busch will show millions of dollars in taxes paid to the government each year of which the society as a whole utilizes for various, unrelated programs. Whether directly or indirectly, we are all affected in some way by Corporate America and the influence these organizations have on our economy. With so many assets and the amount of influence these businesses have it is encouraging that a company such as Budweiser takes an active role in the improvement of the communities it services and not placing its efforts solely in the interest of profits.