Students Lack Of Language Skills example essay topic

738 words
Critical Thinking Is Crucial To Global Success In reference to the article "Critical thinking crucial to global success" It is quite clear cut that the Author has a very strong opinionated belief that the educational system as far as the language field is concerned is inefficient". The method of teaching is monotonous, the teaching material is old, and the teacher has no vision. The subject, accordingly, does not provide students with the required knowledge and skills to develop themselves". In addition to the fact that he sees the system as one which is inadequate he seeks to put most of his emphasis on the ones that he perceives to be the key factors in the development of a much more productive system "the teachers."It is the teacher, not the technology, that matters most.

The essence of updating language teaching is, as a matter of fact, reconstructing the perspective of and having a new awareness of the essence of language education, especially on the part of teachers, college professors, and educational bureaucrats. Basic to innovation in language teaching is a complete understanding of language" However constructive the criticism of the writer, one cannot fail to notice that his literal manner is one that is built mainly on assumptions on the matter that lies before hand. The majority of his statements and theories have no basis in terms of a carried out study or analysis of the current school's situation. As one can clearly see in the statement in which was made where" Given that the substance remains the same, it would be simplistic to equate updating language teaching methods with simply piloting alternative methods of teaching or utilizing new technology".

That statement on its own is an idle assumption made by the writer in which he thus contradicts his own statement by stating "It is the teacher, not the technology, that matters most. Basic to innovation in language teaching is a complete understanding of language". Further assumptions on the part of the writer can be seen "Teachers tend to emulate their former teachers in the classroom. The tendency to emphasize the theory rather than practice of language has been a common phenomenon in language classes. And this practice seems to continue up to now. No wonder our school students lack language skills in particular and communication skills in general.

It is high time to de- emphasize theory in favour of communication skills". In this case the writer is seem coming to a self oriented decision on the practices which are occurring in the school. With his use of "This practise seems to continue up to now". Even though there is uncertainty on his part, yet still a conclusion is drawn on it where the practised is being blamed for the students lack of language skills. The emotional composure of the writer can clearly be seen within the article where his feelings about the state of system. His emotions and loyalty lies with the students and also with the enhancement of the country in general.

Realizing that our students have been left behind compared to their counterparts in other Asian countries, we need to update ways of teaching both national and foreign languages at all level of education, from elementary to university. Language teaching at present should be aimed at meeting global challenges. In the final analysis, though, basic to success in global competition is the mastery of critical thinking". The argument in which the writer puts forward is one that is without question is vindicated however his arguments as stated before are without sound evidence. He fails to use many of the renounced literally skills. For example in the case where he mentioned" Given that the substance remains the same, it would be simplistic to equate updating language teaching methods with simply piloting alternative methods of teaching or utilizing new technology".

Followed by the statement of" It is the teacher, not the technology that matters most. The essence of updating language teaching is, as a matter of fact". The use of a rhetorical question should have been used in this case when mentioning the possibility of utilizing technology versus the upgrade of teachers, since it sends a double message to the point, which he the author is trying to bring across.