Supply Chain In The Military example essay topic

Considering that the military's logistical structure hasn't had a major improvement in over 60 years, the idea of streamlining and consolidating systems would be a welcome and much needed change. I currently work in the ammunition field for the U.S. Army and have done so for the past 18 years. The changes that the Marines are beginning to implement will help to free up resources and cut funds that could be used for other projects. With the attacks of 9-11, many of the military logisticians realized that we were not finished with what we had begun in 1991. They also realized that there had to be a better way to support the force. I deployed with the Army in Desert Storm and was witness to hundreds of containers arriving at the pier overseas with no idea of what was inside.

The only option was to open the containers, inventory the contents and figure out who needed it most. In the ammunition field the thought is that you can never have too much. Unfortunately this was not the case as when we prepared to leave we were forced to destroy and bury thousands of short tons of ammunition that was not used and could not be shipped back to the states. This could have been avoided if the military had a more modern means of controlling its inventories. The changes that the Marines are implementing have allowed them to achieve massive benefits: (Sapient n. d.) o A leaner support structure that will free up 1800 marines from logistics duties and make them available for other purpose so Faster deployment capability resulting from a 20 percent to 70 percent reduction in the tonnage it needs to ship A one-time reduction in inventory of 45 percent to 61 percent Inventory cost saving of $125 million to $180 million every years A 35 percent to 50 percent reduction in order-cycle time for products and services I believe that these changes are long overdue and will continue to allow the U.S. military to be the most feared military force in the history of man. In the past the military was expected to "dig in" and prepare to fight the long fight.

This was alright at the time because the military was focused on only one enemy and continued to fight that enemy until the battle was over. In today's military, we are fighting numerous battles in a variety of environments. With these changes in environments comes a change in the amount and type of equipment that is needed to support the soldier doing the fighting. When this was realized, the logisticians for the military went to the private sector and asked for help.

One of the first things that the military had to change was its attitude that logistics is the same thing as supply management. Logistics plays a very important role in the supply chain but supply chain management involves much more than simply logistics. (Hyland 2002) A team at Ohio State University developed a framework for supply chain management that consists of three supply chain elements: network structure, business processes; and management components. These same elements were applied to the military by Sapient and Penn State University. These entities identified that the Marines had over 200 separate information systems, and to make matters worse, many of these systems could not share data. For example, the system for ammunition accountability, SAAS-Mod, is a stand-alone system that is not able to "talk" with any other supply information system.

This is not only a waste of resources but also became too complex and costly to maintain. With the introduction of Oracle 11 i, the marines are able to streamline a number of processes, such as procurement, fulfillment, distribution, and inventory management. One of the main concerns for the military is to be able to manage their stocks in a real-time environment. The military does not want to have another incident of soldiers burying "excess" ammunition in the desert. The challenge with that is that the military is not able to utilize a just-in-time type system.

This is the type of inventory management system that Wal-mart and other successful chain stores use. If a shopper at Wal-Mart asks an associate about a certain product, the associate, through the use of a wireless handheld computer known as a Talon, is able to tell the individual if the item is out of stock, where it can be located and when it will be available. In contrast if a military office worker requires a printer cartridge, the best that they can do is submit a request through the chain. They may see the part in 2-3 weeks even though the cartridge maybe located in the same building. Now imagine applying that same logic to the soldier on the battlefield needing bullets.

In this case, a just-in-time system would be a too late system and now we are talking about life and death. The purpose of supply chain management is to ensure that the right group gets the right goods and services at the right place at the right time. This is especially important when it is applied to the soldiers fighting in conflicts. Ironically the way that the current military supply system is set up, the soldier rarely gets the correct equipment until it is way too late. A few examples of this would be the lack of body armor and armor for Humvees for soldiers serving in Iraq. Many soldiers were forced to purchase their own body armor from stores such as US Calvary because the military couldn't get the equipment into the inventories fast enough.

One way that the military is looking to help control inventory is to use Radio-frequency identification tags (RFID). (E walt 2002). The RFID tags are able to provide real time data as products are moved along the supply routes. The Army has begun to use RFID tags when shipping ammunition. The RFID tag is attached to a pallet of ammunition at the depot when it is manufactured. As the ammunition is shipped from the depot to the Ammunition Storage Point and in turn out to the using unit Ammunition Holding Areas, it is tracked through the use of these tags.

The result is that the Army is better able to provide the right type of ammunition to the using unit in a timelier manner. This has helped enormously to avoid the same mistakes that were made during Desert Storm in 1991. The implications of what the Marines are doing will be felt through the entire Department of Defense. Regardless of what opinions are expressed, the main concern of the DOD is to have the military work as seamlessly as possible. If the supply systems of all branches of military were able to communicate effectively, this would result in a more efficient and stronger work force.

One of the major implications that could be felt through the government supply world is the potential loss of income. As it stands right now, there are over 200 separate systems. Each of these systems requires operators and equipment. If the number of systems is cut in half to 100, how will the suddenly unemployed react?

It has been my experience in the government that a job that would normally require one person to complete, is given two or three people. This type of fraud and waste is what will be the major obstacle for the government to overcome if they truly want to improve the supply chain in the military.

Bibliography

Ewalt, D.M. & Hayes, M., (2002, Sep 30).
Supply-chain management: Pinpoint control Information Week. Manhasset, 16-19 Hyland, T. (2002, Oct.
Logistics is not supply chain management. Transportation & Distribution. Cleveland, 32-35. Sapient: Modernizing Military Logistics: USMC case study, (n. d.) Sapient corporate website. Accessed 10 August 2005 at web.