Theory Of The Universe example essay topic
Aquinas' argument has a couple of flaws in it. One is pointed out by Samuel Clarke, who says a whole series of dependant beings can have no cause from outside of it, because all things that ever were are supposed to be included in the series. The series also can not have a cause from within because no one being within the series is necessary. An example of this would be the set of real numbers we use today. Taking one number away from the set would not cause the set to cease in existence. There is no beginning to the number set and no end as well.
If we view the Universe with the same concept then Aquinas' theory can be seen to have a major flaw. There is, however, a way to fix Aquinas' theory. If we take his logic into account we can say that there was a time when the universe did not exist. But, the universe exists now therefore it must have had a beginning. By definition a necessary being has no beginning and now end. Due to this definition we can say that the universe is not a necessary being.
This leaves us with one of three options: there is a necessary being, the universe has always existed, or something can come into existence out of nothing. Due to the big bang theory we can eliminate the theory of the universe always existing. Therefore, there is a necessary being or something can come into existence out of nothing. Because we know that something cannot come into existence out of nothing we determine that there must be a necessary being.
However, the necessary being is either God or the universe. Because the universe had a beginning it can not be necessary, therefore God is the necessary being and he must exist. The revised version of Aquinas' theory seems to work because we are shown that even the universe had a beginning. If the universe had a beginning, then something must have set it in motion.
There is only one idea which is greater then the universe, and that idea is God..