Time Of Enlightenment In The Colonies example essay topic

Jonathan Bach HIST 135-06 Test I 9/30/03 Enlightenment in Colonial Society The Enlightenment began in the mid to late 17th century; almost every source gives different dates and doesn't really specify when exactly it started. It consisted as more of a religious revolution, but it also had to do with the emergence of different specialized professions. A major point of the English Enlightenment was that it did not like the idea of a vengeful God, nor did it like the idea that man could only retain so much knowledge and a certain social standing. John Tillotson, who was the archbishop of Canterbury until 1694 would preach, "morality rather than dogma and had a way of defending the doctrine of eternal damnation that left his listeners wondering how a merciful God could possibly have ordained such a cruel punishment". Anglicans hated firm scripture, fought against different superstitions, "scoffed" at experiences that were told from word of mouth, and discarded all "fanaticism".

It didn't matter if it came from the "High Church Laudian's" or the Puritans, both of which caused major problems in England. Sir Isaac Newton's laws of motion were said to be maybe the greatest "intellectual achievements" of all time. Many people suspected that they had already surpassed the wisdom and achievements of the ancient thinkers. Sir Isaac Newton's ideas combined with philosopher John Locke ideas were what fueled it the most. The American colonies began to embrace these new enlightened ideas, and individual people had knowledge about them even before the newspapers could get the word out. John Tillotson had probably the biggest impact on Americans, and made an even bigger impression on Harvard University.

Two young men who had been tutors at Harvard University were huge advocates of Tillotson's ideas, and one of them went on to replace the old college president, Increase Mather, in 1707; and, made Tillotson's ideas a heavily studied subject, his name was John Leverett Jr. For pretty much the rest of the 18th century almost all of the Harvard educated ministers embraced Tillotson's theory; even though a lot of then still said that they were Calvinists. They didn't preach the differences between Congregationalists and Anglicans, instead they spoke of the similarities and wanted a wider range of religious toleration. In America a lot of the intellectual leaders of the colonies were drawn to the new Enlightenment. The colonies may have been founded by leaders of various different religious backgrounds, but when it was necessary to unite and fight against England, it was apparent that not one religion could prevail over the others. The most desirable course for the colonists to take was to agree to disagree.

Nothing more powerfully encouraged the movement of separation of church and state than the realization that no one church could be the only church of the new colonies. Several of the most distinguished leaders of the American Revolution, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Ben Franklin, and Thomas Paine, were very much influenced by the English; and, to a lesser extent the French Enlightenment. Jefferson and Franklin both spent time in France, absorbing the influence of the French Enlightenment. The language of natural law, inherent freedoms, and self-determination which was so deeply rooted in American tradition (what there was of a tradition) was the language of the Enlightenment; however, there was still a little of some other or "traditional" religions involved, which has been called our "civil religion". Eventually different legal professions started to emerge in many of the colonies, and with this surge of new professionals came the ideas of Enlightenment. In the 1600's most of the colonists hated lawyers, people thought of them as "men who took advantage of others and who deliberately stirred up discord".

For a small amount of time Massachusetts and Virginia made it illegal to practice law. Maryland was the only colony where law was actually practiced within the 17th century, but soon after the 17th century the practice of law began to spread all over the colonies. Benjamin Gridley who studied at Harvard University began to practice law in Boston in the 1730's, and ended up writing "enlightened essays" for different Boston newspapers. Ben Gridley really helped further society by starting an informal law school. He helped students learn the laws and took it even further by setting up mock debates where students would argue different legal issues. In just a few years New England basically required a college education to practice law.

In the 18th century Philadelphia was defiantly the place to be if you wanted to "get a taste" of the new enlightenment of medicine. William Shippen went to Princeton and Edinburgh Universities, where he obtained degrees in medicine. He returned to Philadelphia in 1762, and became the first American to publicly speak about medicine. He even started to dissect human bodies, which was something unheard of for his time. John Morgan, a student of William Shippen, was the first American to be an actual professor of medicine in a school. The College of Philadelphia was the first place to establish a medical school, which in turn helped attack people from around the world to further its cause, people such as Benjamin Rush from Scotland.

Benjamin Rush apposed slavery and alcohol and was in favor of the American Revolution. It was said that "many colonial physicians embraced radical politics". Many people, as well as myself, feel that the reason the colonies did not produce great women was the fact that women were still pretty much considered second class citizens. Women didn't go to school, or at least few went to school, and they were brought up to believe that their place in life was in the home, where they would raise the children and keep up the house.

Most men didn't even go to school, and even though this sounds bad, men were considered to be superior to women, at least for a period of time; so really, how was a woman supposed to get ahead? Men were the ones who were supposed to go out and make the money and study in school and even participate in politics. Most men didn't even do that, they ended staying at home and working in fields planting crops; but, if they were lucky they would get some education, if they learned to read, from books. It's sad, but for the most part women didn't do anything besides stay at home, make and raise babies, and keep things at home in order. The time of Enlightenment in the colonies would have been a very interesting time to be alive. I wish I could fully experience what went on in the colonies.

It really seemed like a great time, there is the start of free religious worship (it pretty didn't matter who people prayed to), and the emergence of professionals which greatly increases knowledge and capability of what people can do. I cannot even begin to imagine what was going through the colonists minds during this time, especially when William Shippen made it publicly known that he was dissecting dead human bodies. It would have been great to be apart of these revolutions of knowledge. Without the Enlightenment I don't know where America would be today, without a doubt this would have been a great time to be an American. Even though America was not the first country to be "Enlightened", England and France were before us, I think we had the most significant Enlightenment, we had the most to gain and we lived up to our potential.