Total Failure Of Web Banks example essay topic
Banking in Europe before the introduction of web banks was very basic. People were drawn to the personal attention they received from the customer service staff, the multiple access points such as ATM's and local branches, and the ability to use new technology such as the internet to check balances and transfer funds. The banking structure was very similar across borders of countries and was what people were used to since the evolution of banking. People trusted their banks and showed a great deal of brand loyalty, an important factor that was overlooked when introducing web banks in Europe.
Web Banks very quickly turned into a large failure for many companies across Europe. The initial concept of web banks was that they would provide many services to you in the comfort of your own home, often at far lower rates than traditional banks. While many traditional banks such as Vontobel Holding AG have many requirements to hold accounts with them such as a minimum balance charge and low interest rates, web banks main concept was to offer banking for free with no balance requirements, multiple loan opportunities, and the tracking of many separate accounts under one umbrella. Realization soon came that most banks were built on the personal customer service that it provided and the money that kept the bank afloat was the money earned off loan interest and account charges. This left many bankers in Europe to second guess the new web banks. 'It would have been hard for us to establish full relationships with new customers, and we couldn't really see where the revenue was going to come from.
' With no solid revenue stream and no personal attention, a cornerstone for banking success, it is any wonder that the proposed web banks even were invested in. However, after the success the United States saw with the new technology, Europe began to develop numerous companies. Many factors contributed to the total failure of web banks. In no chronological order, first the money plant went askew. ABN Amro Bank of Amsterdam and KPN Telecom, a Dutch telecommunications firm, ended their eight-month collaboration on Money Planet, a joint venture that would have offered mortgages, insurance, and savings accounts over the Internet in the Netherlands, Germany, and Belgium. ' The worsened sentiment around Internet companies played a role in the ventures folding", said Tan no Massa r, an ABN Amro spokesman.
So too did research showing that the companies' planned investment of $180 million would not have brought in enough return on the initial investment. The companies had spent a few million dollars before folding the effort. Most of the spending was on about 40 employees, who have since returned to jobs in their parent companies. 'The market for Internet financial services companies offering products from different parties under a stand-alone brand name is not convincingly viable. ' A second reason for failure is the lack of multiple access points. An example of an access point is a walk up ATM or drive thru teller.
While the convenience of banking at home on a computer saves time and hassle, the need to bank while on the go becomes almost impossible with today's internet availability. If you needed to bank while an hour away from home where you had no computer, going to the nearest ATM will do you no good. What needed to be implemented was an internet based multi-channel service where multiple access points could be utilized with your current web bank to maximize a user's availability to banking services. "There's a consensus today in the United States and Europe that successful strategy is multi-channel,' said Gwen n Beard, manager of the Paris office for Cement Communications, a global research firm. A third reason for failure of web banks is that internet fraud detracts from potential users to place trust in the new technology. With e-commerce succeeding at such a great rate, thieves also have targeted many such companies.
Web banks became a high profile target because of the large amount of money accessible. "Last month the International Chamber of Commerce's commercial crime unit uncovered $3.9 billion of fake bank guarantees on the Internet. The guarantees were published on at least 29 scam sites -- rigged so they appeared to be run by the international clearing house Euro clear Bank or the financial news provider Bloomberg News -- that tried to persuade people to invest in projects and finance schemes". Examples such as this cause internet companies to spend millions of dollars to protect their network from potential attacks from hackers.
This cost is necessary to ensure safety for clients. Money must also be spent on advertising so that prospective customers can see that there is in fact security in placing their funds with a web bank. Another example of a security problem is the following: "Last August three men were accused of plotting to pull off what would have been the first Internet bank robbery, against Egg. The previous month customers of Barclays Bank's online service found they were able to gain access to other customers' accounts as a result of a software glitch". Each story that broke of internet glitches and theft slowly began to turn the upward curve of prospect in the new technology downward. Bad press began to quickly discourage new customers and caused distress for current customers.
A final reason for web banks' failure across Europe is the lack of unity among neighboring countries. "While the internet supercedes countries boundaries, separate regulations exist prohibiting certain access of the internet". With many people traveling amongst several countries at a time, accessing the internet or being able to access you funds would be impractical. As the European Union continues to form, internet access and continuity is a constant struggle between those within the union and those outside.
There have been a number of projects set up by private banks across Europe that have been the "poster-children" for web bank failure. To introduce a few of them, the Y-O-U Project is the first example. "Vontobel Holding AG, Switzerland's second-largest independent private bank, took a hit of about $150 million on its y-o-u project. In February it terminated the year-old effort, which would have offered Web private banking services to emerging-affluent individuals. It had lost nearly $90 million on the project last year and took a charge of $60 million this year". Another example would be the Work 24 project.
The Royal Bank of Scotland this year canceled a joint venture with Scottish Power to develop Work 24, a site for small and midsize businesses. "The site, on which the companies had planned to spend $100 million, 'would have required a great deal of development work, investment, and marketing,' and both parties decided to fold the venture after working on it for a year and spending a 'small number of millions of pounds. ' " Web banks have proved to be a large failure in both the United States and Europe. While the future may pose some new challenges as well as successes, web banks are for now a rather undesirable concept to involve one's finances with. The failure was caused by things such as a lack of access points, internet fraud, and a lack of unity among neighboring countries. Their failure is just one in a long line of products that have moved from continent to continent without the proper plan to make it a workable service.
Kings on A., Jennifer. American Banker. New York, N.Y. : Sep 15, 2003. Vol. 168, Iss. 175; p. 12. Kushner-Heber, Katie.
American Banker. New York, N.Y. : Nov 18, 2003. Vol. 168, Iss. 222; p. 63. Power, Carol.
American Banker. New York, N.Y. : May 3, 2001. Vol. 166, Iss. 85; pg. 104. Tahmincioglu, Eve. New York Times (East Coast) ).
New York, N.Y. : Jan 18, 2004. pg. 3.7.