Two Different Ways By Plato And Madison example essay topic

Elites: Elites not masses, govern all societies, but in whose interests do they serve. Elites are inevitable in all societies According to both Madison and Plato, factions will inevitably occur within society, the way to address this is viewed in two different ways by Plato and Madison. Plato sees within society an inherent flaw of two cities, a city of the rich and a city of the poor. He rejects oligarchy, the rule of few over many, because he believes that "absolute power corrupts absolutely" and rejects democracy for the incompetence within the system because it lacks people properly schooled in the Plutonian tradition and sees the violence inherent in the system, for: existent in all forms of government exist the extreme violence and selfishness of party struggles for factions within society. Plato would remove the causes of factions, choosing to give up further liberties to protect the good of the people.

His theory is similar to the state of nature, believing that societies are formed to meet the needs of the people. Because of the inherent yearning for power within a few elites, Plato would remove these feelings of selfishness, with his own form of Communism. Plato's communism would take two main forms which meet in the abolition of the family. The first of the two forms would be to set up a new form of hierarchy: Philosopher king, who would rule by merit of vision and capacity to realize that vision in reality.

Guardians, who would serve as the military / ruling class of society, merchant class which serves as a middle class, a buffer between the poor and the rulers. This sunders in two the idea of a city of rich / city of poor. However the main thing to note is that the rulers must give up certain freedoms in order to attain their position of power. The rulers must give up the right to own property, effectively removing self-interest.

Anyone can be a ruler as long as they MERIT the position. Also, the must live in common barracks style living and eat at a common table, facilitating discussion and equality amongst them. Also they all must be schooled in the Plutonian Tradition. The second form of communism would be the abolition of a permanent monogamous sexual relationship. This removes loyalty to family / lover.

Lovemaking would be more like livestock breeding and would occur at the behest of the ruler. Plato believed that if the unity of the state is to be preserved and marriage and property stand in the way than they must be abolished. Madison sees factions as a division of wealth. He believed that a well-constructed union has the tendency to break and control the violence of faction. He believed as well, that the elites were over-bearing the beliefs of the citizens. He believed that there were two ways in which to remove the causes of factions: remove their liberty which was more heinous than simply dealing with the factions; and give to everyone the same beliefs and ideals, which as well is quite impossible.

So in the end he devised a way to control the effects of factions. By decentralizing power into a form of limited government, no one branch is greater than the other. By spreading out the people within a republic, the effects are more widely dispersed. By making those who are likely to boast the purpose of division, revolutionary leaders, give to them reasons to keep the union whole and they will not be so divided...

Extend the sphere of the country, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens; or if such a common motive exists, it will be more difficult for all who feel it to discover their own strength and to act in unison with each other. As Plato noted, in order for society to be content, the majority of society (middle class) must be doing well, or at least believe they are doing well otherwise, rebellions will ensue.