Two Types Of Power Game Players example essay topic

Where love rules, there is no will to power; and where power predominates, there love is lacking. The one is the shadow of the other. Carl Jung People have created a great number of games. A power game even didn't have to be invented for it lies in the nature of every living being. It has penetrated in almost every sphere of our day-to-day life: politics, sport, family relations, different kinds of art, etc.

According to the psychologist Alfred Adler, a domineering type of people is characterized by self-assurance and forcefulness with an insignificant social interest, if there is any. Being active, they do not act in favour of society, hence, do not care about its prosperity and well-being. Such type of people is oriented on superiority over the outside world. The thing they focus on is the top of a career ladder. However, it doesn't mean that everyone takes part in this game. Human beings continue developing, and instincts go in the second place giving in to the desire to work for social needs instead ego ones.

Adler believed that social interest is the main criterion of psychological maturity. Such people are not so much interested in money and power as the result of their work as in a breakthrough as a result of a creativity process. They get power as naturally as they get acknowledgement and awards for contribution in this or that field. They are more passive players of this game because their goal is wider than just getting power. It involves serving for the benefit of people. Taking into account what has been mentioned, we can differentiate between the two types of power game players: .

Those who put their mind to power so that they would overcome any stumbling block without taking into consideration that it can be life and fate of a person or the whole world. They do not get embarrassed when using such methods as lie, violence, and suppression. Hitler's and Stalin's behavior when climbing to the top of power and trying to keep it are the most revealing examples. There are more mild ones... Those who developed their abilities, perfected their skills, and, hence, were rewarded by the power (this is a relative reward for it requires a lot of efforts and, even more importantly, responsibility). The power is the fact of recognition.

For example, Vyacheslav Fetisov, who had been a brilliant hockey player, a successive coach, is now a minister of sports. It is more difficult to get power on the second road because, as Robert Frost once wrote, it is "the one less travelled by" that implies inventing new things and techniques to attract attention and win acknowledgement. But the harder the way is, the sweeter the fruit men in power bear afterwards is. As any other game this one has its set rules, although it depends on the field the player involved in.

For example, if it is politics then etiquette should be observed, and a person should tell the things that people (electorate) would prefer to hear (though they may not be his or her true intentions). It goes without saying that life is a dual matter; hence, a power game can be directed both to the good and to the evil. I'm pessimistic about this question and consider most power games to lead to the latter. As soon as people get power, they forget about people around them as individuals and take them as the crowd (it's not just my speculation, it's what the acquaintance of mine confessed to me once when telling about his perception in times of having power). As I start reflecting on in, words of Thomas Jefferson float in my mind, "I hope our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us, that the less we use our power the greater it will be.".