Type Of Person The Reviewer example essay topic

Documented Essay Wuthering Heights, a story that would not usually be read by a person of my interests, definitely has its ways of drawing you away from the book at the same time bringing you deeply in. Pretty ironic I would say, but the perspective very much makes sense. Every story, every movie, every anything has their pros and cons, but my opinion of Wuthering Heights has a strange way of separating those factors. Referring to my first statement, when I say "a person of my interests", I mean to say that a person like me does not get too excited about love stories or any story that takes a long time to get a point across focusing too much on detail rather the reader's attention span. As a matter of fact, that's if this was even a love story.

But It must be, besides all the hate, vengeance and cruelty, because all those feelings were because of love, and if this is just some twisted love triangle, Jerry Springer has nothing on it. Though talking about the type of person I am may sound irrelevant, there is a connection with this review. How can you accept a review from someone if you don't know what type of person the reviewer is? The reviewer may be nothing like you, so you cannot take his or her opinion into consideration.

Saying this, if you are the type of person a reviewer is, read on and take their opinion into consideration and if you are not, you can do two things, either throw away the review or you can just read on anyway out of curiosity for kicks. "This is a strange book. It is not without evidences of considerable power: but, as a whole, it is wild, confused; disjointed, and improbable; and the people who make up the drama, which is tragic enough in its consequences, are savages ruder than those who live before the days of Homer". (Examiner 285). Great way to start off a review. It gives a big bang and draws me in immediately, but its a shame that I can't take this opinion into consideration.

As said, I don't know this examiner, who he / she is, nor have I read any of their reviews on other books that I've read. This is the first review that I read from them so to take their perspective maybe appealing by the way it started out, it would be blind. To compare it with the movie buff that I am, I always take a review into consideration before I see a movie. Now, I have never met the reviewers of whom I take their word for, but I definitely have heard enough to make my judgment. Their judgments were correct, right on the money, how I felt or thought about a movie was the same as the reviewer I took into consideration so I stay with the same reviewer because I know we think alike and are attracted to similar types of movies.

There are a lot of old timer reviewers who bash on movies that I love. Obviously we don't have the same interests, so why would I even listen to them. One of the big gripes I have with these reviews has to be that they drag just like the novel itself. Reading the reviews left me in question just as the book did after reading it. It's a lot like the reviews in modern day, many of them don't give a straight answer. Again, the "getting to the point" aspect of writing about something is crucial for my types.

The majority of a review is talking about the novel and going into detail. Why do they do this? When reading a review, it should state three things; quick general idea of the story, was it good or bad and why. You can plead your case without dissecting the book. "To all such "Wuthering Heights" must appear a rude and strange production". (Editor's Preface to the New Edition of Wuthering Heights (1850) 313).

Must? Where are you going with that. And if it is a rude and strange production, is it a good thing? They start out like this, and then get into detail talking about the novel. This shouldn't be the point of a review. A review should be taken seriously only when you know of the reviewer.

Personally, the best reviewers that I have are friends who see or read something that I haven't yet, and they will give me a great review because they are like me. The other point is that reviews should give a straight answer, not just talking about a story, but giving an honest opinion. Many of the reviews that I have read for Wuthering Heights had similar approaches and similar endings leaving me with a question. So was it a good thing or bad thing? Did you like it or not? That's what I want to know, and that is the reason why I would read a novel.

If I take your word for it, then I will read it and figure out what it is all about.