Ultimate Goal Of Affirmative Action For Blacks example essay topic

"Affirmative action" means taking positive steps to increase the numbers of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically barred. When those steps involve preferential selection on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity affirmative action generates intense controversy. Affirmative Action works, it benefit minority. When I heard about Affirmative Action I completely agreed with it.

When I came to United States living in poorer inner cities made me appreciate Affirmative Action more. It somehow gave me hope and made me try even harder, so I will be accepted to university with the help of Affirmative Action. Minorities face discrimination everyday. For instance, when September 11 took place Muslim people faced vital discrimination. Most of them could not find job, and most of them feared of losing their job. They were terrified they could not wear their traditional clothe, like scarf.

Most of them end up taking off their scarf so they will not be recognized as Muslim in order to keep their job. Minorities' coming from a different country has to begin a new life in United States. Meanwhile the white men have everything planed out for him. Children of minorities have to work hard in order to have a better life; others like white children have everything provided for them. Minorities can not escape poverty; they can not change their life style. They can not create an educational environment for themselves.

To truly understand the importance of affirmative action, one must look at America's past discrimination to see why, at this point in history, we must become more color conscious. One must spend a day in a shoe of minorities and how they feel to face discrimination. Dinesh D'Souza began the debate with the issue of race. He explained that there are other factors that have caused societal problems such as gender, but that these issues are minor by comparison to the race issue.

The focus of his argument was of the need for colorblind policies in admissions process in all aspects of educational institutions. He furthered explained the issue of affirmative action, what it is, and how it works or doesn't work. He went on by stating that our educational future is being threatened by the fact that these institutions are using aggressive forms of racial preferences in the admissions process. "The concept of rational discrimination is that you can be a racist and not discriminate. You can discriminate and not be a racist", said D'Souza.

"If you are a cab driver of any color in Washington, D.C., for example, and you refuse to admit a black man into your cab, you are going by statistics. You are trying to protect your best interests to ensure your own safety". D'Souza explained that these discriminations should not interfere with the selection process for colleges or the job market. The fact that he wanted to get across was that people are being balanced through the admission process of these institutions depending on the applicant's race. Frank Wu is a proud supporter of Affirmative Action, and he believes people have privileges that we were born with and should recognize that we should embrace these privileges.

He describes Affirmative Action, as a fallacy of color blindness and that there are benefits to color consciousness. He explains that it is right to be undecided and that the true principles of affirmative action are of civil rights, what type of society is ideal and that the idea that these schools can come to be almost all white most be rejected. He sends the message to support Affirmative Action because of its benefits. The principles of genuine equality of racial discrimination, it is day-to-day problem. In order to understand the inequities of the Affirmative Action program, and most people take these programs beyond education, which is not the essential goal of the program.

"Colorblindness could be achieved", said Wu. "Why is it we take preferences? The answer is simple. When we look around, we make assumptions everyday. And some of these assumptions, some of these preferences, limit our ability to see people". The general equality of opportunity is a goal with no exclusion of anyone; it is to do well in education, which is believed to be a very utopian philosophy.

Both views were completely controversial but debatable issues that have been in question ever since Affirmative Action programs started to develop. One issues that are the major factor into finding a good strategic option to fix the problem of racial discrimination in education and society as a whole is to start at the very core of the problem. Second issues structures of family and how some families depending on culture and race emphasize the idea of educational endeavors for the future for their children. Families of younger children depends of Affirmative Action they believe is the only way to escape poverty and stereotypes of this country. Third issues is in Affirmative Action because in its original form it was thought as proper and purposeful, as well as legitimate, but now it has gone out of control.

It has gotten out of hand because minorities face prejudice and stereotypes of white man. White man believes minorities taking Affirmative Action too far when first started; their creating more programs out of it. Until today minorities face inequality and discrimination. Louis Pojman defines affirmative action as the effort to rectify the injustice of the past by special policies. He argues in favor of affirmative action that role models are required, the stereotypes need to be broken, that compensation is required, and that diversity is needed. Gertrude Ezorsky maintains that the ultimate goal of affirmative action for blacks is occupation integration.

She argues that the success of other minorities does not show that there in no need for affirmative action. She further argues that is not unfair to white worker given that they have gained from past racism. Charles Murray argues that it has actually worked against the interest of black by encouraging a new form of racism. The old racism openly held that blacks are permanently less competent than whites. The new racism holds that blacks are temporarily less competent than whites. He concludes that there is no such thing as good racial discrimination.

Stanly Fish argues that just as it would be a mistake to equate Zionism with Nazi racism, it would be a mistake to equate affirmative action with the racism that blacks have suffered in this country. Fish claims, is to ignore the importance of history. He argues that what looks like a level plying field to some such as SAT. I believe Gertrude Ezorsky held better arguments she omitted intentional tactics, but more true facts of reality. She explained that the rule of hiring by competence has been subject to so many exception that adding an exception for affirmative action would not constitute a significant departure form current practice. She also claims that the goal of statistical representation of minorities in employment ignores "certain reality of community".

She explained that in the past black into the most miserable work, the distinctive history of two centuries of slavery and murderous racism of the post Reconstruction century. Her argument made better sense and she avoided tactics and held somewhat my believes. Stanly Fish did not hold a strong analogy with Zionism with Nazi racism. Pojman and Murray did not hold a strong arguments they did not hold the argument theirs, they gave out example without supporting their own believes. It was more like giving out surveys and explaining others beliefs. Overall I believe Dinesh D'Souza held a better argument than Frank Wu and the collateral essays.

According to D'Souza, equality of opportunity does not lead to equality of outcomes "because of merit". Frank Wu used more Ad Hominem tactics. "Affirmative action is good because it acknowledges the guilt that we all share", Wu said. He did make some true remarks about diversity and the guilt everybody shares toward racism of the past. I hold strong position with Frank Wu because I am also favor of Affirmative Action. Affirmative action works.

There are thousands of examples of situations where people of minorities both men and women of all races who were previously excluded from jobs or educational opportunities, or were denied opportunities once admitted, have gained access through affirmative action. When these policies received executive branch and judicial support, vast numbers of minorities' women and men have gained access they would not otherwise have had. My beliefs has not changed I still believe Affirmative Action in not against us is for us. Only those who been down for one job, they blame affirmative action. Minorities face rejection and discrimination for decades. White men benefited from the past.

Affirmative Action will create more diverted society, which benefit white man and minorities. Affirmative Action is the society's most ambitious attempt to redress it is long history of racial and sexual discrimination.